Search Results (15)

Background/Objectives: Despite progress in secondary prevention, people with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) still face a residual risk of ischemic events. Antithrombotic therapy reduces this risk and helps stabilize chronic cardiovascular disease. Studies have shown that combining low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin—an approach called dual-pathway inhibition (DPI)—can lower this risk and reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, researchers have not yet gathered enough real-world data to confirm the efficacy and safety of this strategy. The DUTCH CCS registry aims to collect real-world data on how effective and safe low-dose rivaroxaban combined with aspirin is for patients with CCS in The Netherlands. The study aims to provide insights into the outcomes, benefits, and risks of DPI in a real-world setting, beyond the scope of controlled clinical trials. Methods: The DUTCH CCS registry operates as a national, multicenter, prospective observational study. It enrolls 1000 patients with CCS who receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) and aspirin (80 mg or 100 mg once daily). The study targets individuals at high ischemic risk due to coronary artery disease (CAD) and follows a single-arm design. Researchers will measure the primary efficacy endpoint by tracking MACEs, clinically driven coronary, peripheral, or carotid revascularization, and stent thrombosis over one year. They will assess the primary safety endpoint by recording major bleeding events at one year. The team will collect data at both 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. Conclusions: As an observational study, this registry is not designed to establish causality. However, it seeks to improve our understanding of how DPI performs in real-world secondary prevention for CCS patients. The results may help update treatment guidelines and inform clinical decisions in everyday practice. Full article

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been licensed worldwide for several years for various indications. Each year, 10–15% of patients receiving oral anticoagulants will undergo an interventional procedure, and expert groups have issued several guidelines for perioperative management in such situations. According to the PAUSE study, the proposed randomized strategy of stopping DOACs without bridging therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation was associated with low rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism so that its implementation is increasingly safe. The present study was carried out in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of the standardized perioperative DOAC management strategy by measuring the residual activity of oral anticoagulants when stopping them preoperatively in daily practice in a regional hospital. Thirty-two patients were included in the present study. They were patients who suffered from atrial fibrillation or deep vein thrombosis and were receiving an oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban or apixaban at the indicated dose. These patients underwent an elective surgery or invasive procedure at the Karditsa General Hospital between May 2022 and April 2023. The results showed that in a percentage of >90% of the patients on the day of surgery they had a residual anti-Xa activity below 0.5 U/mL. This rate is considered high and confirms the safety and efficacy of the guideline-recommended protocol for perioperative discontinuation of DOACs. Full article

Atherothrombosis, the primary driver of acute cardiovascular (CV) events, is characterized by the activation of three key pathophysiological pathways: platelets, coagulation, and inflammation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the current standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome, providing significant reductions in cardiovascular (CV) events, albeit with an associated increased risk of bleeding. However, the high residual risk of recurrent events among these patients highlights the need for alternative strategies to treat and prevent atherothrombosis. To this extent, several approaches aimed at targeting atherothrombosis have been proposed. Among these, a strategy of dual-pathway inhibition simultaneously targeting platelets, using single or DAPT, and coagulation, using a low-dose anticoagulant such as rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily, has shown to reduce CV events but at the expense of increased bleeding. Targeting inflammatory pathways has the potential to be a highly effective strategy to tackle atherothrombosis without increasing bleeding risk. Several anti-inflammatory agents have been tested in patients with coronary artery disease, but to date only colchicine is approved for secondary prevention on top of standard care, including antiplatelet therapy. However, many aspects of colchicine’s mechanism of action, including its antiplatelet effects and how it synergizes with antiplatelet therapy, remain unclear. In this review, we summarize the available clinical and pre-clinical evidence on the antiplatelet effects of colchicine and its synergistic interactions with antiplatelet therapy, highlighting their potential role in addressing atherothrombosis. Full article

Background: The therapeutic effects of oral anticoagulant drugs for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) suggest that the three factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors may have distinct safety profiles, though this is not yet fully conclusive. This study investigated the current dosing of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban by monitoring drug plasma concentration (PC) and coagulation activity from the viewpoint of the safety. Methods and results: This multicenter clinical study monitored the drug PC and two coagulation biomarkers (fibrinogen and fibrin monomer complex [FMC]) at peak and trough timing in 268 outpatients taking rivaroxaban (n = 72), apixaban (n = 71), and edoxaban (n = 125) for NVAF. Doses were adjusted based on the dose-adjustment criteria of each drug. Referencing our previous study, peak drug PC remained below the cut-off level for predicting bleeding events except in eight patients (rivaroxaban, n = 3; apixaban, n = 2; edoxaban, n = 3) in whom bleeding events occurred. Among them, two (one each on rivaroxaban and edoxaban) had a peak drug PC below the cut-off level. Drug PCs widely varied from peak to trough, whereas FMC levels, reflecting thrombin activity, remained within the normal range (<6.1 µg/mL) regardless of PC variations. These results indicated that the anticoagulant effects of these drugs persisted throughout the day regardless of the drug PC levels, dosage, and dosing frequency. Regarding the change over time in peak PC, the elevation over time developed more in rivaroxaban (29/57; 50.9%, p < 0.05) than in edoxaban (32/101; 31.7%), and rivaroxaban tended to accumulate more than edoxaban. Conclusions: Although drug PC levels of once-daily FXa inhibitors widely varied from peak to trough, FMC levels were maintained within the normal range without daily variations. Rivaroxaban also tended to accumulate over time. The results indicate the low risk of thrombotic events with once-daily FXa inhibitors and its correspondence to the twice-daily regimen. Full article

Once considered relatively benign, superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs is linked to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in up to one fourth of cases. Treatment goals include alleviating local symptoms and preventing SVT from recurring or extending into DVT or PE. Fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily for 45 days is the treatment of choice for most patients with SVT. Potential alternatives include intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin or the direct oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban, however, these require further evidence. Despite these treatment options, significant gaps remain, including the role of systemic or topical anti-inflammatory agents alone or combined with anticoagulants, and the optimal duration of anticoagulation for patients at varying risk levels. Additionally, the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors other than rivaroxaban, management of upper extremity SVT, and optimal treatment for SVT near the sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junctions are not well understood. This narrative review aims to summarize current evidence on anticoagulant treatment for SVT, highlight key unmet needs in current approaches, and discuss how ongoing studies may address these gaps. Full article

Objectives: To review the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of low-dose-rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (LDR) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) taking antiplatelets. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy endpoints were cardiovascular events (CVEs), myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause, and cardiovascular death. Any, major, fatal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were safety endpoints. Numbers needed to treat (NNT), and numbers needed to harm (NNH) were also calculated. Results: Seven RCTs were included with 45,836 patients: 34,276 with CAD and 11,560 with PAD. Overall, 4247 CVEs and 3082 bleedings were registered. LDR in association with either any antiplatelet drug or aspirin (ASA) alone reduced the risk of CVEs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.78–0.94) and ischemic stroke (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.55–0.84). LDR + ASA increased the risk of major bleeding (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.38–2.11) but no excess of fatal bleeding or ICH was found. The NNT to prevent one CVE for LDR + ASA was 63 (43–103) and the NNH to cause major bleeding was 107 (77–193). Conclusions: The combination of LDR with either antiplatelet drugs or low-dose aspirin reduces CVEs and ischemic stroke in patients with CAD/PAD. There was an increased risk of major bleeding but no excess of fatal or ICH was found. LDR seems to have a favorable net clinical benefit compared to ASA treatment alone. Full article

Background: The way in which to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an unmet clinical need in cancer patients. International guidelines only provide conditional recommendations and do not specify which anticoagulant and dose should be used. In the last 2 years, we have been using low-dose rivaroxaban to prevent VTE recurrences in cancer patients. The results of this real-life experience are presented in this study. Methods: All patients had cancer and had previously completed a cycle of at least six months of full-dose anticoagulation for the treatment of a VTE index event, before receiving a prescription of low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) for secondary prevention of VTE. Effectiveness and safety of this therapeutic regimen were evaluated in terms of VTE recurrences, major bleedings (MB), and clinically relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB). Results: The analysis included 106 cancer patients. Their median age was 60 years (IQR 50–69). Metastatic cancer was present in 87 patients (82.1%). Six patients (5.7%) had brain metastases. Over a median follow-up time of 333 days (IQR 156–484), the incidence of VTE recurrences was 3.8% (95%CI 1.0–9.4), with a recurrence rate of 4.0 per 100 person-years (95%CI 1.1–10.2). We observed no MB (0.0%) and three CRNMB (2.8%) (95%CI 0.6–8.1). Conclusions: Low-dose rivaroxaban is potentially effective and safe in cancer patients that require prevention of recurrent VTE. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article

Objectives: To assess the comparative budget and health impact of lower-dose dabigatran versus reduced doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients eligible for a lower-/reduced-dose due to individual patient characteristics in the Netherlands. Methods: A budget impact model was developed in accordance with ISPOR guidelines. A 3-year-time horizon was considered, and analyses were conducted from a Dutch healthcare payer’s perspective. The model applies published data to local AF-epidemiology, allowing calculations to estimate clinical events (strokes and haemorrhages) and costs. The analyses were based on real-world outcomes from patients with AF receiving a first direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescription for low-dose dabigatran (110 mg) and a reduced dose of apixaban (2.5 mg) or rivaroxaban (15 mg). Two situations of switching treatments from one to another DOAC were modelled: switching from apixaban to dabigatran and from rivaroxaban to dabigatran. Base case results were given as savings per 100 patient-year, per total Dutch population, and events avoided. A univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the uncertainty around epidemiological and event costs input data. Scenario analyses were performed to estimate the effect of different market shares and potential price reductions due to future patent expiry for the total real-world population from the Netherlands. Results: The 3-years outcomes of switching patients eligible for a lower-/reduced-dose due to individual patient characteristics from apixaban or rivaroxaban to dabigatran resulted in cost savings estimated at €157 or €72 thousand per 100 patient-years, respectively, or €146 million per total Dutch population. Looking into the clinical events, dabigatran reflected the lowest number of mortalities, ischemic strokes, major bleeding, non-major bleeding, and haemorrhagic stroke compared to apixaban and rivaroxaban. The sensitivity analysis consistently reflected cost savings, with the ischeamic stroke events having the biggest impact. Accounting for the Dutch situation, both scenarios showed total savings ranging from €45 to €229 million over 3 years. Conclusions: Switching eligible AF-patients from reduced-dose apixaban or rivaroxaban to lower-dose dabigatran has the potential to reduce healthcare payer’s budget expenditures and provide health gains. Cost savings can potentially be further enhanced by market share adjustments and further price reductions. Full article

This narrative review of the literature, consisting of papers found in PubMed and The Cochrane Library published up to 31 July 2023, analyzed those that were deemed to be closely related to the title of this paper. It was encountered that the peril of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in people with hemophilia (PWH) after orthopedic surgery is very small, such that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not necessary in most cases. The hemophilia literature states that the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis should only be performed in PWH undergoing major orthopedic surgery (total-knee arthroplasty, total-hip arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis) who have additional venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors, such as old age, prior VTE, varicose veins, general anesthesia, cancer, factor V (Leiden) mutation, overweight, and treatment with the oral contraceptive pill (in females with von Willebrand’s illness). If we notice various risk factors for VTE in PWH who experience orthopedic surgery, theoretically, we should perform the identical type of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis advised for non-hemophilia patients: low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), such as enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneous/24 h); or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), either thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran, 150 mg oral/12 h) or activated factor X (FXa) inhibitors (rivaroxaban, 20 mg oral/24 h; apixaban, 5 mg oral/24 h), or subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg/24 h subcutaneously). However, the review of the literature on hemophiliac patients has shown that only a few authors have used pharmacological prophylaxis with LMWH (subcutaneous enoxaparin) for a short period of time (10–14 days) in some patients who had risk factors for VTE. Only one group of authors used a low dose of DOAC in the dusk after the surgical procedure and the next day, specifically in individuals at elevated risk of VTE and elevated risk of bleeding after the surgical procedure. Full article

(1) Background: High-level evidence on antithrombotic therapy after infrainguinal arterial bypass surgery in specific clinical scenarios is lacking. (2) Methods: A modified Delphi procedure was used to develop consensus statements. Experts voted on antithrombotic treatment regimens for three types of infrainguinal arterial bypass procedures: above-the-knee popliteal artery; below-the-knee popliteal artery; and distal, using vein, prosthetic, or biological grafts. The treatment regimens for these nine procedures were then voted on in three clinical scenarios: isolated PAOD, atrial fibrillation, and recent coronary intervention. (3) Results: The survey was conducted with 28 experts from 15 European countries, resulting in consensus statements on 25/27 scenarios. Experts recommended single antiplatelet therapy after above-the-knee popliteal artery bypasses regardless of the graft material used. For below-the-knee popliteal artery bypasses, experts suggested combining single antiplatelet therapy with low-dose rivaroxaban if the graft material used was autologous or biological. They did not recommend switching to triple therapy for patients on oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation or dual antiplatelet therapy in any scenario. (4) Conclusions: Great inconsistency in the antithrombotic therapy administered was found in this study. This consensus offers guidance for scenarios that are not covered in the current ESVS guidelines but must be interpreted within its limitations. Full article

The optimal antithrombotic strategy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has not yet been established. The advisability of administering low-dose direct oral anticoagulation after LAAC to patients at high risk of bleeding is uncertain. Thus, in the present study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of reduced-(15 mg) or half-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg) versus warfarin regarding real-world risks of thromboembolism, bleeding, and device-related thrombosis (DRT) after LAAC. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and HASBLED ≥ 3 who had undergone successful LAAC device implantation from October 2014 to April 2020 were screened and those who had received 10 mg or 15 mg rivaroxaban or warfarin therapy were enrolled. The patients were followed up 45 days and 6 months after LAAC to evaluate outcomes, including death, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and DRT. Of 457 patients with HASBLED ≥ 3 who had undergone LAAC, 115 had received warfarin and 342 rivaroxaban (15 mg: N = 164; 10 mg: N = 178). There were no significant differences in the incidence of thromboembolism or DRT between the warfarin and both doses of rivaroxaban groups (all p > 0.05). The incidence of major bleeding was significantly higher in the warfarin group than in either the reduced- or half-dose rivaroxaban groups (warfarin vs. rivaroxaban 15 mg: 2.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.030; warfarin vs. rivaroxaban 10 mg: 2.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.038). Either reduced- or half-dose rivaroxaban may be an effective and safe alternative to warfarin therapy in patients with LAAC and who are at high risk of bleeding, the risk of thromboembolism being similar and of major bleeding lower for both doses of rivaroxaban. Full article

Low-dose rivaroxaban has been used in Asian patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) eligible for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are few pharmacokinetic (PK) data in Thai patients to support precise dosing. This study aimed to develop a population PK model and determine the optimal rivaroxaban doses in Thai patients. A total of 240 Anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban from 60 Thai patients were analyzed. A population PK model was established using the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict drug exposures at a steady state for various dosages. Proportions of patients having rivaroxaban exposure within typical exposure ranges were determined. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) and body weight significantly affected CL/F and V/F, respectively. Regardless of body weight, a higher proportion of patients with CrCl < 50 mL/min receiving the 10-mg once-daily dose had rivaroxaban exposures within the typical exposure ranges. In contrast, a higher proportion of patients with CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min receiving the 15-mg once-daily dose had rivaroxaban exposures within the typical exposure ranges. The study’s findings suggested that low-dose rivaroxaban would be better suited for Thai patients and suggested adjusting the medication’s dose in accordance with renal function. Full article

Background: The use of rivaroxaban in clinical practice often deviates from manufacturer prescribing information. No studies have demonstrated an association between this practice and improved outcomes. Methods: We used the RIETE registry to assess the clinical characteristics of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) who received off-label rivaroxaban, and to compare their 3-month outcomes with those receiving the labeled therapy. The patients were classified into four subgroups: (1) labeled therapy; (2) delayed start; (3) low doses and (4) both conditions. Results: From May 2013 to May 2022, 2490 patients with PE received rivaroxaban: labeled therapy—1485 (58.6%); delayed start—808 (32.5%); low doses—143 (5.7%); both conditions—54 (2.2%). Patients with a delayed start were more likely to present with syncope, hypotension, raised troponin levels and more severe abnormalities on the echocardiogram than those on labeled therapy. Patients receiving low doses were most likely to have cancer, recent bleeding, anemia, thrombocytopenia or renal insufficiency. During the first 3 months, 3 patients developed PE recurrence, 4 had deep-vein thrombosis, 11 had major bleeding and 16 died. The rates of major bleeding (11 vs. 0; p < 0.001) or death (15 vs. 1; OR: 22.5; 95% CI: 2.97–170.5) were higher in patients receiving off-label rivaroxaban than in those on labeled therapy, with no differences in VTE recurrence (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.25–6.57). Conclusions: In patients with severe PE, the start of rivaroxaban administration was often delayed. In those at increased risk for bleeding, it was often prescribed at low doses. Both subgroups had a worse outcome than those on labeled rivaroxaban. Full article

Globally, the death rate of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has doubled over 30 years and is likely to further increase, making PDAC a leading cause of cancer-related death in the coming years. PDAC is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage, and modified FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine are the mainstay of systemic therapy. For elderly patients with good performance status, low-dose treatment can preserve quality of life without compromising cancer control or survival. Maintenance therapy should be considered in PDAC patients achieving disease control with systemic therapy. In particular, olaparib has demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit of 3.6 months in a subgroup of PDAC patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (ca. 10% of all PDAC). Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is often omitted in the treatment of patients with PDAC, with possibly deleterious consequences. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is highly prevalent in patients with PDAC and should be considered in the diagnostic algorithm of PDAC patients with bloating and diarrhea. Rivaroxaban has been associated with a reduced risk of thrombosis without an increase in major bleeding events, and its use should be considered in every patient with advanced PDAC undergoing systemic therapy. Full article

Dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and a thienopyridine, such as clopidogrel, is effective for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but there is still a substantial residual risk of recurrence. Although anticoagulant therapy with a vitamin K antagonist (e.g. warfarin) in conjunction with antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, the rates of bleeding were increased with these combination therapies; hence, triple therapy with warfarin is currently only recommended in patients at low risk of bleeding. In addition, there are other limitations associated with vitamin K antagonist therapy, including the need for routine coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment to maintain the treatment within the therapeutic range. Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor; in clinical practice, it is likely that rivaroxaban will be given to patients who also receive antiplatelet therapy, such as clopidogrel. This randomized, non-blinded, three-way crossover study investigated the effect of rivaroxaban on bleeding time when co­administered with clopidogrel. In addition, the influence of clopidogrel on the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban was investigated. Of 27 healthy male subjects who received a single 300 mg dose of clopidogrel, 14 were identified as clopidogrel responders and were then randomized to the following three treatments: (A) two doses of clopidogrel on two consecutive days (300 mg on day 1; 75 mg on day 2); (B) one dose of rivaroxaban (15 mg); or (C) a combination of treatments A and B (rivaroxaban given on day 2). All treatments were well tolerated. Bleeding time with co­administration of rivaroxaban and clopidogrel was significantly prolonged in four subjects, compared with either drug alone: combination treatment increased the overall least squares-means to 3.77 times baseline (90% confidence interval [CI] 2.82–4.73), compared with 1.13 times baseline (90% CI 0.17–2.09) with rivaroxaban and 1.96 times baseline (90% CI 0.10–2.91) with clopidogrel. Co-administration of clopidogrel had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and, when compared with rivaroxaban alone, had no further effects on Factor Xa activity or prothrombin time. Inhibition of ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation by clopidogrel was not affected by rivaroxaban. As expected, owing to the mode of action of each study drug, the results of this study demonstrated that co­administration of the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban and the antiplatelet clopidogrel increased the bleeding time in healthy subjects without affecting other pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of each drug. Full article