Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = laterite rooms

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 6862 KiB  
Article
Energy Savings and Carbon Emission Mitigation Prospective of Building’s Glazing Variety, Window-to-Wall Ratio and Wall Thickness
by Saboor Shaik, Kirankumar Gorantla, Aritra Ghosh, Chelliah Arumugam and Venkata Ramana Maduru
Energies 2021, 14(23), 8020; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238020 - 1 Dec 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3236
Abstract
Strategic selection of glazing, its window-to-wall ratio, and wall thickness of building reduce the energy consumption in the built environment. This paper presents the experimental results of solar optical properties of five glasses: clear, tinted bronze, tinted green, bronze reflective, and polymer dispersed [...] Read more.
Strategic selection of glazing, its window-to-wall ratio, and wall thickness of building reduce the energy consumption in the built environment. This paper presents the experimental results of solar optical properties of five glasses: clear, tinted bronze, tinted green, bronze reflective, and polymer dispersed liquid crystal glasses. Laterite room models were modeled with four different thicknesses and four different glasses using Design Builder, and thermal simulation tests were carried out using Energy Plus. The energy savings and carbon emission mitigation prospective of a building’s glazing variety, window-to-wall ratio (WWR), and wall thickness were investigated. The results revealed that among the five window glasses studied, the polymer dispersed liquid crystal glazing window (PDLCGW) was found to be the most energy-efficient for low heat gain in laterite rooms. The laterite room with 0.23 m wall thickness and 40% PDLCGW WWR reduced 18.9% heat gain in comparison with the laterite room with 0.23 m wall thickness and 40% clear glass WWR. The laterite room of 0.23 m wall thickness with PDLCGW glazing of 40% WWR enhanced cooling cost savings up to USD 31.9 compared to the laterite room of 0.08 m wall thickness with 40% PDLCGW. The laterite room of 0.23 m wall thickness with PDLCGW glazing of 40% WWR also showed improved carbon mitigation of 516 kg of CO2/year compared to the 0.23 m wall thickness laterite room of 40% WWR with clear glass glazing. The results also showed that the laterite room with 0.23 m wall thickness and 100% clear glass WWR increased heat gain by 28.2% in comparison with the laterite room with 0.23 m wall thickness and 20% clear glass WWR. The results of this article are essential for the strategic design of buildings for energy saving and emission reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section G1: Smart Cities and Urban Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4958 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Lime-Treated Lateritic Soil for Reservoir Shoreline Stabilization
by Ricardo Moreira Vilhena, Márcia Maria dos Anjos Mascarenha, Renato Resende Angelim, Tomás da Rosa Simões, Renato Batista de Oliveira and Marta Pereira da Luz
Water 2020, 12(11), 3141; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113141 - 10 Nov 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2751
Abstract
Sedimentation is one of the major problems addressed by reservoir management, and requires extensive effort to control it. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency of the soil–lime stabilization technique for reservoir shores. The treatment consisted of spraying hydrated lime in slurry form [...] Read more.
Sedimentation is one of the major problems addressed by reservoir management, and requires extensive effort to control it. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency of the soil–lime stabilization technique for reservoir shores. The treatment consisted of spraying hydrated lime in slurry form over the surface of a lateritic clay sample with 1, 2, and 4% lime solution and curing times of 1, 7, 28, and 56 days with air-drying and moist-room storage. In addition, a single test with less than 1% lime solution by weight percentage was carried out. The post-cured specimens were mapped with SEM and X-ray analyses. A wave flume test was performed in samples subjected to diverse conditions of lime content, type, and curing time. The results showed that the present technique produces a Ca-rich crust by carbonation rather than stabilizing it and that the lime content and type of curing generate improvements in soil loss reduction, but the curing time does not. The technique gave relative protection against water level variation and wave impacts, but it is necessary to consider a frequent application of lime on the lateritic soil. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Local Erosion of Hydraulic Structures and Flood Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop