Search Results (3)

Background: Despite benefits during open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), the artery-first approach (AFA) during minimally invasive PD (MIPD) has been poorly investigated. Methods: Data of consecutive patients undergoing MIPD (both laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD)) from 2020 to 2024 for pancreatic cancer (PC) were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed, comparing the surgical and oncological outcomes of LPD with right AFA and RPD with posterior AFA. The rate of ineffective AFA (IAFA), defined in the case of excessive resection time, estimated blood loss, or conversion to laparotomy, was also investigated. Results: 71 patients undergoing MIPD were selected (32 LPD and 39 RPD). Baseline patients’ characteristics only differed for a higher rate of neoadjuvant treatment in LPD and RPD groups, respectively (23.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.0036). No patients underwent conversion. R0 resection was obtained in 74.6% of patients. No difference between the groups was found regarding intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes except for a greater number of lymph nodes harvested in RPD (24 vs. 17, p = 0.023). IAFA was observed in 12.7% of patients, without difference between the groups (9.4 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.499, in LPD and RPD, respectively). Conclusions: MIPD with AFA was feasible and safe in patients affected by PC. RPD using posterior AFA had a higher number of lymph nodes retrieved when compared to LPD using right AFA. RPD has provided subjective advantages for the surgeon in terms of handling, safety, and reproducibility, although these have not translated into better outcomes. Full article

Background: It is critical for every pancreatic surgeon to determine how to protect the aberrant hepatic artery intraoperatively in order to safely implement laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD). “Artery-first” approaches to LPD are ideal procedures in selected patients with pancreatic head tumors. Here, we described our surgical procedure and experience of aberrant hepatic arterial anatomy-LPD (AHAA-LPD) in a retrospective case series. In this study, we also sought to confirm the implications of the combined SMA-first approach on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of AHAA-LPD. Methods: From January 2021 to April 2022, the authors completed a total of 106 LPDs, of which 24 patients underwent AHAA-LPD. We evaluated the courses of the hepatic artery via preoperative multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and classified several meaningful AHAAs. The clinical data of 106 patients who underwent AHAA-LPD and standard LPD were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the technical and oncological outcomes of the combined SMA-first approach, AHAA-LPD, and the concurrent standard LPD. Results: All the operations were successful. The combined SMA-first approaches were used by the authors to manage 24 resectable AHAA-LPD patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.1 ± 12.1 years; the mean operation time was 362 ± 60.43 min (325–510 min); blood loss was 256 ± 55.72 mL (210–350 mL); the postoperation ALT and AST were 235 ± 25.65 IU/L (184–276 IU/L) and 180 ± 34.43 IU/L (133–245 IU/L); the median postoperative length of stay was 17 days (13.0–26.0 days); the R0 resection rate was 100%. There were no cases of open conversion. The pathology showed free surgical margins. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 18 ± 3.5 (14–25); the number of tumor-free margins was 3.43 ± 0.78 mm (2.7–4.3 mm). There were no Clavien–Dindo III–IV classifications or C-grade pancreatic fistulas. The number of lymph node resections was greater in the AHAA-LPD group (18 vs. 15, p < 0.001). Surgical variables (OT) or postoperative complications (POPF, DGE, BL, and PH) showed no significant statistical differences in both groups. Conclusions: In performing AHAA-LPD, the combined SMA-first approach for the periadventitial dissection of the distinct aberrant hepatic artery to avoid hepatic artery injury is feasible and safe when performed by a team experienced in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. The safety and efficacy of this technique need to be confirmed in large-scale-sized, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled studies in the future. Full article

Background and Aims: Recent single-center retrospective studies have focused on laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients, and compared the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open approaches. Our study aimed to determine the outcomes of LPD in the elderly patients, by performing a systematic review and a meta-analysis of relevant studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases to identify all studies that compared laparoscopic vs. open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results: Five retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Overall, 90-day mortality rates were significantly decreased after LPD in elderly patients compared with open approaches (RR = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.32–0.96; p = 0.037, I² = 0%). The laparoscopic approach had similar mortality rate at 30-day, readmission rate in hospital, Clavien–Dindo complications, pancreatic fistula grade B/C, complete resection rate, reoperation for complications and blood loss as the open approach. Additionally, comparing with younger patients (<70 years old), no significant differences were seen in elderly cohort patients regarding mortality rate at 90 days, readmission rate to hospital, and complication rate. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, we identify that LPD in elderly is a safe procedure, with significantly lower 90-day mortality rates when compared with the open approach. Our results should be considered with caution, considering the retrospective analyses of the included studies; larger prospective studies are required. Full article