Search Results (5)

Background and Clinical Significance: Plexiform fibromyxoma (PFM) is a rare benign gastric mesenchymal neoplasm characterized by multinodular plexiform growth of bland spindle cells in a myxoid or fibromyxoid stroma. We report a case of the cellular form of PFM with limited myxoid stroma and aberrant KIT expression, resulting in diagnostic difficulty by biopsy. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old woman presented with a slowly enlarging 15 mm gastric antral submucosal tumor. A resected specimen by laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery revealed spindle cell proliferation forming plexiform nodules with a myxoid background in limited areas. Positive immunoreactivity of a subset of spindle cells for KIT suggested a diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), although DOG1 was negative. In addition, diffuse staining for CD10, smooth muscle actin, and D2-40 was confusing. MALAT1::GLI1 fusion was detected by next-generation sequencing analysis. Consequently, a diagnosis of PFM was established. Conclusions: This case expands the morphologic and immunophenotypic spectrum of PFM and indicates the possible diagnostic utility and biological significance of D2-40 expression. Although molecular confirmation of MALAT1::GLI1 fusion is definitive for the diagnosis of PFM, the findings of the present case may aid diagnosis in challenging cases that mimic GIST. Full article

Per-oral flexible endoscopy has expanded minimally invasive options for the management of gastric subepithelial tumors (G-SETs). This narrative review appraises conventional and advanced endoscopic resections alongside hybrid laparoscopic–endoscopic procedures, within a size- and layer-based clinical framework. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieve high en bloc resection rates for small, intraluminal tumors arising from mucosa or submucosa. Traction strategies and dedicated traction devices may improve submucosal exposure, shorten procedure time, and reduce adverse events. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has been developed to enucleate tumors originating from the muscularis propria while preserving mucosal integrity. However, tunnel creation and specimen retrieval become challenging for large tumors or for those located in the cardia or fundus. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) enables controlled transmural excision of G-SETs arising from deeper wall layers. Exposed EFTR, combined with secure endoscopic closure, provides high en bloc and complete (R0) resection rates. Closure options range from through-the-scope clips—for small defects—to over-the-scope clips, endoloop-clip purse-string methods, reopenable-clip over-the-line techniques and endoscopic suturing systems—for larger defects. Non-exposed EFTR and device-assisted systems reduce the risk of peritoneal contamination, although complete resection rates are more variable. Hybrid approaches, including classical laparoscopic–endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) and non-exposure variants, combine endoscopic precision with the safety and closure capabilities of laparoscopic surgery, minimizing the amount of resected gastric wall. They are particularly suited to larger, awkwardly located or ulcerated G-SETs. Emerging traction platforms, flexible robotic systems, and AI-based tools may further broaden the role of per-oral flexible endoscopy for the treatment of G-SETs. However, evidence remains preliminary, and surgery continues to play a key role for large, extraluminal or anatomically prohibitive G-SETs. Full article

An increasing number of duodenal tumors are being diagnosed over the years, leading to increased confusion regarding the choice of treatment options. Small-to-large tumors and histological types vary from adenoma to carcinoma, and treatment methods may need to be selected according to lesion characteristics. Because of its anatomic characteristics, complications are more likely to occur in the duodenum than in other gastrointestinal organs. Several reports have described the outcomes of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, cold snare polypectomy, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumors. However, even in the guidelines set out by various countries, only the treatment methods are listed, and no clear treatment strategies are provided. Although there are few reports with a sufficiently high level of evidence, considering the currently available treatment options is essential. In this report, we reviewed previous reports on each treatment strategy, discussed the current issues and prospects, and proposed the best possible treatment strategy. Full article

Background: Considering the widespread use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SET) increases. For relatively safer removal of upper GI SETs, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as an alternative to surgery. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of endoscopic resection for SETs and develop a prediction model for the need for laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) during the procedure. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 123 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for upper GI SETs between January 2012 and December 2020 at our institution. Intraoperatively, they underwent ESD or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). Results: ESD and STER were performed in 107 and 16 patients, respectively. The median age was 55 years, and the average tumor size was 1.5 cm. En bloc resection was achieved in 114 patients (92.7%). The median follow-up duration was 242 days without recurrence. Perforation occurred in 47 patients (38.2%), and 30 patients (24.4%) underwent LECS. Most perforations occurred in the fundus. Through multivariable analysis, we built a nomogram that can predict LECS requirement according to tumor location, size, patient age, and sex. The prediction model exhibited good discrimination ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. Conclusions: Endoscopic resection is a noninvasive procedure for small upper-GI SETs. Most perforations can be successfully managed endoscopically. The prediction model for LECS requirement is useful in treatment planning. Full article

Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique. Full article