Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = keyword-conditioned image segmentation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1528 KB  
Article
Keyword-Conditioned Image Segmentation via the Cross-Attentive Alignment of Language and Vision Sensor Data
by Hye Rim Kim and Byoung Chul Ko
Sensors 2025, 25(20), 6353; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25206353 - 14 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1266
Abstract
Advancements in multimodal large language models have opened up new possibilities for reasoning-based image segmentation by jointly processing visual and linguistic information. However, existing approaches often suffer from a semantic discrepancy between language interpretation and visual segmentation as a result of the lack [...] Read more.
Advancements in multimodal large language models have opened up new possibilities for reasoning-based image segmentation by jointly processing visual and linguistic information. However, existing approaches often suffer from a semantic discrepancy between language interpretation and visual segmentation as a result of the lack of a structural connection between query understanding and segmentation execution. To address this issue, we propose a keyword-conditioned image segmentation model (KeySeg) as a novel architecture that explicitly encodes and integrates inferred query conditions into the segmentation process. KeySeg embeds the core concepts extracted from multimodal inputs into a dedicated [KEY] token, which is then fused with a [SEG] token through a cross-attention-based fusion module. This design enables the model to reflect query conditions explicitly and precisely in the segmentation criteria. Additionally, we introduce a keyword alignment loss that guides the [KEY] token to align closely with the semantic core of the input query, thereby enhancing the accuracy of condition interpretation. By separating the roles of condition reasoning and segmentation instruction, and making their interactions explicit, KeySeg achieves both expressive capacity and interpretative stability, even under complex language conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vision Sensors for Object Detection and Tracking)
Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 814 KB  
Systematic Review
Generative Adversarial Networks in Histological Image Segmentation: A Systematic Literature Review
by Yanna Leidy Ketley Fernandes Cruz, Antonio Fhillipi Maciel Silva, Ewaldo Eder Carvalho Santana and Daniel G. Costa
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 7802; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15147802 - 11 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2933
Abstract
Histological image analysis plays a crucial role in understanding and diagnosing various diseases, but manually segmenting these images is often complex, time-consuming, and heavily reliant on expert knowledge. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as promising tools to assist in this task, enhancing [...] Read more.
Histological image analysis plays a crucial role in understanding and diagnosing various diseases, but manually segmenting these images is often complex, time-consuming, and heavily reliant on expert knowledge. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as promising tools to assist in this task, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of segmentation in histological images. This systematic literature review aims to explore how GANs have been utilized for segmentation in this field, highlighting the latest trends, key challenges, and opportunities for future research. The review was conducted across multiple digital libraries, including IEEE, Springer, Scopus, MDPI, and PubMed, with combinations of the keywords “generative adversarial network” or “GAN”, “segmentation” or “image segmentation” or “semantic segmentation”, and “histology” or “histological” or “histopathology” or “histopathological”. We reviewed 41 GAN-based histological image segmentation articles published between December 2014 and February 2025. We summarized and analyzed these papers based on the segmentation regions, datasets, GAN tasks, segmentation tasks, and commonly used metrics. Additionally, we discussed advantages, challenges, and future research directions. The analyzed studies demonstrated the versatility of GANs in handling challenges like stain variability, multi-task segmentation, and data scarcity—all crucial challenges in the analysis of histopathological images. Nevertheless, the field still faces important challenges, such as the need for standardized datasets, robust evaluation metrics, and better generalization across diverse tissues and conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computing and Artificial Intelligence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop