Search Results (9)

For interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets featuring complementary symmetry in evaluation relations, this paper proposes a novel, complete fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) method that optimizes both expert weights and attribute weights. First, an optimization model is constructed to determine expert weights by minimizing the cumulative difference between individual evaluations and the overall consistent evaluations derived from all experts. Second, based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the improved closeness index for evaluating each alternative is obtained. Finally, leveraging entropy theory, a concise and interpretable optimization model is established to determine the attribute weight. This weight is then incorporated into the closeness index to enable the ranking of alternatives. Integrating these features, the complete fuzzy MAGDM algorithm is formulated, effectively combining the strengths of subjective and objective weighting approaches. To conclude, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are thoroughly verified and compared through detailed examination of two real-world cases. Full article

Uncertainty exists in reality decision-making problems. Therefore, fuzzy theories, fuzzy intervals, intuitionistic fuzzy, and Z-numbers have been proposed and successfully applied to multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). However, since the information presented in the Z-numbers method is the subjective opinion of the decision-maker, the problem of overestimating or underestimating the reliability of the information may occur in both individual and group decision-making. The Extended Z-numbers (Z^E-numbers) method was proposed in 2021 to solve this problem; hence, the decision-making process no longer relies on subjective opinions only but seeks external experts related to the problem to further vote on the evaluation value given by the internal decision-maker, in order to modify the information’s reliability, and thus to obtain a more realistic result. This paper combines the Z^E-numbers method with the improved Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realite II (ELECTRE II) proposed in 2022 and proposes a new MCDM method based on Z^E-numbers, named Z^E-ELECTRE II. The green supplier selection problem was used as an illustrative example. Meanwhile, the close analysis in this paper examines two primary dimensions of variability: (1) simulation of external expert voting situations to analyze the variations in information reliability and decision-making results and to cross-compare them with other MCDM methods; (2) investigation of the impact of internal preferences, as reflected through systematic adjustments to the weights of the evaluation criteria. The results show that uncertainty of information, reliability, and the perspectives of different decision-makers and expert groups can be considered through Z^E-numbers. The proposed Z^E-ELECTRE II is applicable to group decision-making, validates the robustness of the process, and is suitable for dynamic decision-making under varying decision-maker preferences. Furthermore, using the Z^E-numbers along with the MCDM method can obtain more flexibility and more reliable results. Full article

Low-carbon tourism is an effective solution to cope with the goal conflict between developing tourist economy and responding to carbon emission reduction and ecological environment protection. Tourism scenic spots are important carriers of tourist activities and play a crucial role in low-carbon tourism. There are multiple factors affecting the low-carbon performance of a tourism scenic spot, and thus the performance evaluation and ranking of low-carbon tourism scenic spots can be framed as a hierarchical multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. This paper develops a novel method to tackle hierarchical MCDM problems, in which the importance preferences of criteria over the decision goal and sub-criteria with respect to the upper-level criterion are provided by linguistic-term-based pairwise comparisons and the assessments of alternatives over each of sub-criteria at the lowest level are furnished by positive interval values. The linguistic-term-based pairwise comparison matrices are converted into intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and an approach is developed to obtain the global importance weights of the lowest level sub-criteria. A multiplicatively normalized intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrix is established from the interval-value-based assessments of alternatives and a method is proposed to determine the intuitionistic fuzzy value based comprehensive scores of alternatives. A case study is offered to illustrate how to build a performance evaluation index system of low-carbon tourism scenic spots located at Zhejiang Province of China and show the use of the proposed intuitionistic fuzzy hierarchical MCDM method. Full article

Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information contains two key issues: acceptability measurement and priority weight determination. In this paper, we investigate the above two issues with respect to multiplicative interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation (IVIFPR). Firstly, a consistency index is defined to measure the multiplicative consistency degree of IVIFPR and an optimization model is established to improve the consistency degree of IVIFPR to an acceptable one. Next, in terms of priority weight determination, an error-analysis-based extension method is proposed to obtain priority weight vector from the acceptable IVIFPR. For GDM problems, decision makers’ weights are derived by the proposed multiplicative consistency index. Subsequently, the collective IVIFPR is obtained by using an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) weighted averaging operator. Finally, a step-by step algorithm for GDM with IVIFPRs is given, and an example of enterprise innovation partner selection is analyzed, and comparative analyses with existing approaches are performed to demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is both effective and practical in dealing with GDM problems. Full article

This paper aims to propose an innovative approach to group decision making (GDM) with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) preference relations (IVIFPRs). First, an IVIFPR is proposed based on the additive consistency of an interval-valued fuzzy preference relation (IVFPR). Then, two mathematical or adjusted programming models are established to extract two special consistent IVFPRs. In order to derive the priority weight of an IVIFPR, after taking the two special IVFPRs into consideration, a linear optimization model is constructed by minimizing the deviations between individual judgments and between the width degrees of the interval priority weights. For GDM with IVIFPRs, the decision makers’ weights are generated by combining the adjusted subjective weights with the objective weights. Subsequently, using an IVIF-weighted averaging operator, the collective IVIFPR is obtained and utilized to derive the IVIF priority weights. Finally, a practical example of a supplier selection is analyzed to demonstrate the application of the proposed method. Full article

The linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (LIVIF) set is an efficient tool to represent data in the form of interval membership degrees in a qualitative rather than a quantitative manner. The LIVIF set combines the features of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and the linguistic variables (LV) and hence provides more freedom to decision-makers. Under this environment, the main objective of this manuscript is to propose some new aggregation operators by capturing the prioritized relationship between the objects. For this, different weighted averaging and geometric aggregation operators are proposed in which preferences related to each object are expressed in terms of LIVIF numbers. Desirable properties of the proposed operators are studied. Further, a group decision-making (DM) approach is presented to solve the multi-attribute DM problems, and its efficiency has been verified with an illustrative example. Full article

With strengthening global consciousness of environmental protection, green supply chain management plays an increasingly important role in modern enterprise production operation management. A critical means to implement green supply chain management is incorporating environmental requirements into the supplier selection practices. In this paper, we put forward a novel integrated approach by using interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic sets (IVIULSs) and grey relational analysis (GRA)-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method for the evaluation and selection of green suppliers. First, various qualitative assessments of alternatives provided by decision makers are described by the IVIULSs. Then, the GRA-TOPSIS method is extended and employed to prioritize the alternative suppliers. The proposed model can handle the uncertainty and fuzziness of decision makers’ subjective evaluations more easily and get a more realistic and accurate ranking of green suppliers. Finally, an illustrative example in the agri-food industry is presented to verify the proposed green supplier selection model and demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness. Full article

During the decision-making process, evaluation information may be given in different formats based on the decision makers’ research fields or personal customs. To address the situation that alternatives are evaluated by both intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IFPRs) and intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations (IMPRs), a new priority approach based on a net flow score function is proposed. First, the two preference relations above are transformed into the corresponding interval-valued fuzzy preference relations (IVFPRs) and interval-valued multiplicative preference relations (IVMPRs), respectively. Second, the net flow score functions of individual IFPRs and IMPRs are obtained. Third, according to information theory, a mean deviation maximization model is constructed to compute the weights of decision-makers objectively. Finally, the collective net flow score of each alternative is obtained to determine the ranking result. The proposed method is certified to be simple, valid, and practical with three examples. Full article

This paper proposes a novel approach to cope with the multi-criteria group decision-making problems. We give the pairwise comparisons based on the best-worst-method (BWM), which can decrease comparison times. Additionally, our comparison results are determined with the positive and negative aspects. In order to deal with the decision matrices effectively, we consider the elimination and choice translation reality (ELECTRE III) method under the intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations environment. The ELECTRE III method is designed for a double-automatic system. Under a certain limitation, without bothering the decision-makers to reevaluate the alternatives, this system can adjust some special elements that have the most influence on the group’s satisfaction degree. Moreover, the proposed method is suitable for both the intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation and the interval valued fuzzy preference relations through the transformation formula. An illustrative example is followed to demonstrate the rationality and availability of the novel method. Full article