Search Results (5)

Background: Early language development, a key predictor of later academic achievement, arises out of social interactions and communication. High-quality social and emotional interactions in early child care and education (ECCE) programs may therefore promote language-rich environments for young children. While culturally and linguistically minoritized communities face systemic barriers that limit equitable access to high-quality ECCE including social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, access to evidence-based SEL programs remains inequitable, disproportionately benefiting White, English-speaking, and higher-income ECCE providers. The current study aims to examine how I-T CHILD, a program designed to foster a climate that supports mental health and SEL in ECCE, improves the quality of the language environment using LENA technology. Methods: Implemented at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, 38 family child care providers located in an urban setting (63.2% Hispanic/Latine; 40% living in poverty) were randomly assigned to the 12-week I-T CHILD program or to the waitlist-control group. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling procedures. Results: Infants and toddlers cared for by I-T CHILD providers produced significantly more vocalizations (p = 0.002; ES = 1.50) and were exposed to significantly less media and electronic sounds (p = 0.032; ES = −0.97) than infants and toddlers in the waitlist-control condition. Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the importance of the mental health climate in ECCE and its circular effect on early language development. We offer key insights into how mental health climate interventions in ECCE settings can enhance language interactions, center the child, and foster foundational skills linked to long-term academic success for historically underserved populations. Full article

Background/Objectives: Early care and education programs promote children’s social–emotional development, predicting later school success. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened an existing youth mental health crisis and increased teacher stress. Therefore, we applied an infant and early childhood mental health consultation model, Jump Start Plus COVID Support (JS+CS), aiming to decrease behavioral problems in children post-pandemic. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial compared JS+CS to an active control, Healthy Caregivers–Healthy Children (HC2), at 30 ECE centers in low-income areas in South Florida. Participants were not blinded to group assignment. Teachers reported on children’s social–emotional development at baseline and post-intervention using the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. We assessed whether teacher stress, classroom practices, and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between JS+CS and child outcomes. We also explored whether baseline behavior problems moderated JS+CS effects on child protective factors, relative to HC2. Results: Direct group-by-time differences between JS+CS and HC2 were limited. However, JS+CS demonstrated significant within-group improvements in teacher-reported child protective factors, behavior support practices, and classroom safety practices. Classroom safety practices consistently mediated positive changes in child behaviors, including the DECA total protective factor score and subdomains of initiative and self-regulation. Additionally, teacher perceptions of behavior support mediated gains in child attachment. Conclusions: JS+CS shows promise in building protective systems around children through intentional support for teachers, underscoring the value of whole-child, whole-environment approaches in early intervention. Full article

Early intervention services are a critical support for young children experiencing developmental delays and disabilities. Due to myriad negative social and economic conditions, some infants and young children, namely Black, Indigenous, and other children of color, as well as those experiencing poverty, are at greater risk of experiencing a developmental delay or disability and experiencing issues of access to needed services and supports within and beyond early intervention programs. Due to these systemic issues, these infants and young children are more likely to have caregivers experiencing mental health concerns and issues of access to services and supports. Early childhood serving programs are faced with meeting the behavioral health needs of families experiencing cumulative vulnerabilities. Some early intervention (EI) programs are partnering with infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) providers to meet mental health needs. IECMH consultation (IECMHC) is a multi-level support that aims to build the capacity of early childhood programs to meet the needs of young children, families, caregivers, and staff. IECMHC has an intentional focus on promoting and ensuring equity, specifically more equitable systems. It focuses on addressing inequities impacting young children and their caregivers, thus strengthening these essential collaborations. This paper highlights research demonstrating the importance and collective power of IECMHC in early intervention programs to advance behavioral health and equity. Full article

Background/Objectives: High-quality inclusive education is important for promoting the positive development of children with disabilities in early childhood care and education (ECCE) settings. However, ECCE teachers may not have the knowledge and skills to manage challenging behaviors in young children, especially those with disabilities. Infant and Early childhood mental health consultation (IECMHC) is one mechanism to support the professional development of teachers. This study explored the impact of an evidence-based IECMHC program, Jump Start Plus COVID Support (JS+CS), on outcomes for teachers in classrooms including children with disabilities. Methods: Utilizing a RE-AIM framework, we examined the extent that JS+CS impacted teacher outcomes related to classroom practice and teacher attitudes after the initial intervention period. In addition, we examined the extent that the classroom children with disability ratio moderated the impact of the intervention on teacher outcomes. Using a cluster randomized controlled trial in a sample of 138 racially and ethnically diverse teachers in 31 ECCE centers, we examined the reach, effectiveness, adoption, and implementation of JS+CS. Results: The results indicate that the JS+CS program shows promise as an intervention to support ECCE teachers working in classrooms with children with disabilities, particularly in improving teacher safety practices, behavior management skills, and resiliency coping. In addition, the program was adopted equally in classrooms that served children with and without disabilities. Conclusions: This is a unique contribution to the literature given that no previous IECMHC programs have examined adoption in classrooms serving children with disabilities. Further investigation is needed to determine the specific factors that impact program implementation considering that this study was conducted during various phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article

Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health (IECMH) is a multidisciplinary field of inquiry, practice, and policy concerned with enhancing the social-emotional competence of infants and young children. Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) is a system of services that supports infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. ECI providers promote a child’s development in all domains, including social-emotional. The purpose of this paper is to describe how two systems, Early Childhood Intervention and Infant Early Childhood Mental Health, collaborate when serving children who have developmental delays or disabilities and their families and other caregivers. We will discuss two models used to promote social-emotional development, the Pyramid Model and IECMH Consultation, and provide three examples that demonstrate how ECI and IECMH intersect at both the family, classroom, and system levels. Full article