Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = in-seam boreholes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 3935 KiB  
Article
Optimization and Engineering Application of In-Seam Borehole Predrainage Technology for Coalbed Methane Based on Response Surface Methodology
by Yanhui Li, Qian Liu, Chuanjie Zhu and Yue’e Wu
Processes 2025, 13(5), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051601 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 425
Abstract
To advance the optimization of engineering parameters in in-seam borehole predrainage technology, this study developed a comprehensive analytical framework integrating theoretical modeling, numerical simulation, and field validation. Taking Pingdingshan Tian’an Coal Mine No. 1 as a practical case study, we established a gas-bearing [...] Read more.
To advance the optimization of engineering parameters in in-seam borehole predrainage technology, this study developed a comprehensive analytical framework integrating theoretical modeling, numerical simulation, and field validation. Taking Pingdingshan Tian’an Coal Mine No. 1 as a practical case study, we established a gas-bearing coal seam drainage model based on fluid–solid coupling theory. A multifactor optimization scheme was implemented using response surface methodology (RSM) complemented by an evaluation system focusing on the gas extraction efficiency coefficient (K). Numerical simulations through COMSOL Multiphysics 6.0 enabled detailed investigation of single-factor influences and multifactor coupling effects, ultimately identifying field-verified optimal parameters. Key discoveries include the following: (1) Spatiotemporal evolution patterns of gas drainage compliance zones showing stabilized interborehole pressure gradients and enhanced regional connectivity after 300-day extraction; (2) a parameter sensitivity hierarchy for K-value defined as drainage duration (primary) > borehole spacing > borehole diameter > extraction negative pressure; (3) an optimized configuration (4.5 m spacing, 113 mm diameter, 18 kPa pressure) achieving a 54.2% pressure reduction with a 0.98 efficiency coefficient. Field data demonstrated only 2.1% average deviation from model predictions, validating the methodology’s effectiveness for gas control parameter optimization in coal mining operations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2890 KiB  
Article
Response Surface Analysis on Multiple Parameter Effects on Borehole Gas Extraction Efficiency
by Xiaoyu Cheng, Cheng Cheng, Lu Xiao and Xingying Ma
Processes 2024, 12(8), 1587; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081587 - 29 Jul 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1272
Abstract
To explore the impact of different factors on the effectiveness of borehole gas extraction, in situ stress tests were conducted in a test mining area. A theoretical model of gas migration within the coal matrix–fracture system was established. Based on field data, a [...] Read more.
To explore the impact of different factors on the effectiveness of borehole gas extraction, in situ stress tests were conducted in a test mining area. A theoretical model of gas migration within the coal matrix–fracture system was established. Based on field data, a numerical model was constructed to study the variation patterns of the effective extraction radius under different extraction conditions. Using the response surface methodology, the interactions of different factors and their impact on the effective extraction radius were analyzed, resulting in a response surface model for each factor and the effective extraction radius. The results indicate that the initial permeability of the coal seam has the greatest impact on the extraction radius, with a maximum range of 2.027 m. The influence of extraction time, extraction negative pressure, and borehole diameter decreases sequentially. The borehole diameter has the least impact, with a range of 0.608 m. The response surface model has good significance, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9957, and it can explain over 99.57% of the response values. The response surface between the initial permeability of the coal seam and extraction time shows the greatest degree of distortion, indicating a significant interaction effect on the extraction radius. In contrast, the response surface between extraction time and extraction negative pressure shows the least degree of distortion, indicating that their interaction effect is the least significant. These findings can provide a theoretical reference for improving borehole design and enhancing gas extraction efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Safety Monitoring and Prevention Process in Coal Mines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1838 KiB  
Article
Improvement of Intensive In-Seam Gas Drainage Technology at Kirova Mine in Kuznetsk Coal Basin
by Sergey Slastunov, Konstantin Kolikov, Andrian Batugin, Anatoly Sadov and Adam Khautiev
Energies 2022, 15(3), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031047 - 30 Jan 2022
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3459
Abstract
One of the ways to resolve the “green energy-economic development” dilemma, in which the coal industry is situated, is by the improvement of technologies and the integrated use of extracted resources, including methane gas as a clean energy source. Using the example of [...] Read more.
One of the ways to resolve the “green energy-economic development” dilemma, in which the coal industry is situated, is by the improvement of technologies and the integrated use of extracted resources, including methane gas as a clean energy source. Using the example of the Kirova mine, located in Kuznetsk coal basin—one of the ecologically unfavorable coal mining regions of Russia—this article discusses an integrated technology for the extraction of coalbed methane (ECBM), which makes it possible to reduce greenhouse gas (methane) emissions and improve the safety and intensity of coal mining. The Kirova mine, with its 3 Mt production in 2019, is one of the coal mining leaders in Russia. The available mining equipment has the potential to significantly increase the output; however, gas is a limiting factor to this. The customary approaches to coal seam degassing have already been petered out. The miners and mine science are facing a challenge to validate and test an alternative technology to ensure effective in-seam gas drainage prior to vigorous mining. This article gives an account of the improvement track record of the in-seam gas drainage technology used to pre-treat coal seams for intensive and safe extraction. This technology suggests, at the first stage, hydraulic loosening of the target coal seam through wells drilled from the surface (SSHL), then hydraulic fracturing (HF) of the coal seam through the boreholes drilled from underground development headings, followed by methane extraction from the high-permeability coal-gas reservoir created through standard in-seam gas drainage underground wells. Results are presented in this paper of field testing of the improved SSHL technique. Findings are presented on the effective parameters of the HF technology. Methodological recommendations are offered for selecting viable in-seam gas drainage technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section H3: Fossil)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3071 KiB  
Article
Gas Migration Patterns with Different Borehole Sizes in Underground Coal Seams: Numerical Simulations and Field Observations
by Haibo Liu, Zhihang Shu, Yinbin Shi, Xuebing Wang, Xucheng Xiao and Jia Lin
Minerals 2021, 11(11), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11111254 - 11 Nov 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2400
Abstract
Gas flow in a coal seam is a complex process due to the complicated coal structure and the sorption characteristics of coal to adsorbable gas (such as carbon dioxide and methane). It is essential to understand the gas migration patterns for different fields [...] Read more.
Gas flow in a coal seam is a complex process due to the complicated coal structure and the sorption characteristics of coal to adsorbable gas (such as carbon dioxide and methane). It is essential to understand the gas migration patterns for different fields of engineering, such as CBM exploitation, underground coal mine gas drainage, and CO2 geo-sequestration. Many factors influence gas migration patterns. From the surface production wells, the in-seam patterns of gas content cannot be quantified, and it is difficult to predict the total gas production time. In order to understand the gas flow patterns during gas recovery and the gas content variations with respect to production time, a solid-fluid coupled gas migration model is proposed to illustrate the gas flow in a coal seam. Field data was collected and simulation parameters were obtained. Based on this model, different scenarios with different borehole sizes were simulated for both directional boreholes and normal parallel boreholes in coal seams. Specifically, the borehole sizes for the directional boreholes were 10 m, 15 m, and 20 m. The borehole sizes for the normal parallel boreholes were 2 m, 4 m, and 6 m. Under different gas drainage leading times, the total gas recovery and residual gas contents were quantified. In Longwall Panel 909 of the Wuhushan coal mine, one gas drainage borehole and five 4 m monitoring boreholes were drilled. After six months of monitoring, the residual gas content was obtained and compared with the simulation results. Of the total gas, 61.36% was drained out from the first 4 m borehole. In this field study, the effective drainage diameter of the drainage borehole was less than 8 m after six months of drainage. The gas drainage performance was tightly affected by the borehole size and the gas drainage time. It was determined that the field observations were in line with the simulation results. The findings of this study can provide field data for similar conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minerals Impact on CO2 Geo-sequestration in Deep Reservoirs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop