Search Results (7)

Background and Clinical Significance: Disorders caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) are recognized as the cause of severe thrombotic events and are not restricted to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Case Presentation: We report a 67-year-old man with thrombocytopenia and extensive portal-splenic-mesenteric vein thrombosis complicated by intestinal ischemia. Despite intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), his condition worsened toward pulmonary embolism, septic shock, and multi-organ failure. Thrombolysis with alteplase was also ineffective. Both thrombophilia testing and autoimmune panels were negative, including those for antiphospholipid syndrome. An anti-PF4 immune thrombotic disorder was hypothesized. Therefore, argatroban was initiated instead of UFH therapy and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) was administered. The platelet count increased and the patient’s clinical condition progressively improved. An anti-PF4/heparin assay on a blood sample collected before IVIG was highly positive. Platelet activation assays did not demonstrate an increased activation after the addition of heparin (the Heparin-Induced Platelet Activation [HIPA] assay was negative) though increased activation was observed with the addition of PF4 (the PF4-Induced Platelet Activation [PIPA] assay was positive), thus defining a VITT-like syndrome. Conclusions: This case report highlights the crucial function of having adequate laboratory facilities available to disentangle different anti-PF4 disorders for an accurate definition of a specific diagnosis, such as VITT-like syndrome, thereby allowing for the most appropriate therapeutic management of these complex pathological conditions. The clinical suspicion of an anti-PF4 immune disorder should be considered in cases of severe, otherwise unexplained, thrombotic events associated with thrombocytopenia. Specific tests like HIPA and PIPA are essential for definitive diagnosis. Full article

Background/Objectives: Adenoviral vector-based vaccines against COVID-19 rarely cause vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT), a severe adverse reaction caused by IgG antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4). To study VITT, patient samples are crucial but have become a scarce resource. Recombinant antibodies (rAbs) derived from VITT patient characteristic amino acid sequences of anti-PF4 IgG are an alternative to study VITT pathophysiology. Methods: Amino acid sequences of the variable region of immunoglobulin light and heavy chain of anti-PF4 IgG derived from VITT patients were obtained by mass spectrometry sequencing and rAbs were synthetized by reverse-engineering. Six different rAbs were produced: CR23003, CR23004, and CR23005 (from a patient vaccinated with Jcovden, Johnson & Johnson-Janssen (Beerse, Belgium)), CR22046, and CR22050 and CR22066 (from two different patients vaccinated with Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca (Cambridge, UK)). These rAbs were further characterized using anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin IgG ELISAs, rapid anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/polyanion chemiluminescence assays, and PF4-induced platelet activation assay (PIPA) and their capacity to induce procoagulant platelets. Results: rAbs bound to PF4 alone, but not to PF4/polyanion complexes in rapid chemiluminescence assays. Chemiluminescence assays and both anti-PF4 IgG and anti-PF4 IgG/heparin ELISA showed concentration-dependent PF4 binding of all six rAbs, however, with different reactivities among them. PIPA showed a similar, concentration-dependent platelet activation pattern. rAbs varied in their reactivity and the majority of the tested rAbs were able to induce procoagulant platelets. Conclusions: The six rAbs derived from VITT patients reflect VITT-typical binding capacities and the ability to activate platelets. Therefore, these rAbs offer an attractive new option to study VITT pathophysiology. Full article

Introduction: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare yet severe adverse complication first identified during the global vaccination effort against SARS-CoV-2 infection, predominantly observed following administration of the ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and Ad26.CoV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) adenoviral vector-based vaccines. Unlike other anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody-mediated disorders, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), VITT arises with the development of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies 4–42 days post-vaccination, typically featuring thrombocytopenia and thrombosis at unusual sites. Aim: To explore the unique properties, pathogenic mechanisms, and long-term persistence of VITT antibodies in patients, in comparison with other anti-PF4 antibody-mediated disorders. Discussion: This review highlights the complexity of VITT as it differs in antibody behavior and clinical presentation from other anti-PF4-mediated disorders, including the high incidence rate of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and the persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies, necessitating a re-evaluation of long-term patient care strategies. The nature of VITT antibodies and the underlying mechanisms triggering their production remain largely unknown. Conclusion: The rise in awareness and subsequent prompt recognition of VITT is paramount in reducing mortality. As vaccination campaigns continue, understanding the role of adenoviral vector-based vaccines in VITT antibody production is crucial, not only for its immediate clinical implications, but also for developing safer vaccines in the future. Full article

Antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4), a protein released from alpha-granules of activated platelets, may cause a number of pathophysiological conditions. The most commonly known is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which develops in a small proportion of people treated with the anticoagulant drug heparin. Notably, PF4 binds with high affinity to heparin, and in HIT, complexes of PF4/H may, in a small proportion of susceptible patients, trigger the development of anti-PF4 antibodies and subsequent platelet activation and aggregation, ultimately leading to the development of pathological thrombosis at sites of vessel occlusion. Of more modern interest, antibodies against PF4 may also arise in patients with COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) or in patients who have been vaccinated against COVID-19, especially in recipients of adenovirus-based vaccines. For this latter group of patients, the terms VITT (vaccine-induced [immune] thrombotic thrombocytopenia) and TTS (thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome) have been coined. Another category associated with this pathophysiology comprises those in whom a precipitating event is not clear; this category is referred to as ‘spontaneous HIT-like syndrome’. Despite its name, it arises as an HIT-mimicking disorder but without antecedent heparin exposure. In this narrative review, we describe the development of antibodies against PF4, and associated pathophysiology, in such conditions. Full article

Knowledge on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia keeps increasing. Recent progress on diagnosis and management as well as several discoveries concerning its pathogenesis have been made. However, many aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain partly unknown, and exact application of these new insights still need to be addressed. This article reviews the main new concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Full article

PF4 is a megakaryocyte-derived cationic chemokine that plays a part in innate immunity through its activity on the macrophages. In bacterial sepsis, PF4 binds to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on the surface of aerobic bacteria, giving rise to an antigenic complex that induces the early formation of anti-PF4 IgG-IgA-IgM. This triggers the immune response in patients receiving heparin therapy who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). These antibodies have also been identified in patients with chronic Gram-negative infections. Given the complexity of this innate immune response network, our study on 45 patients with sepsis focused on the immune response mediated by platelet PF4. We analyzed the role of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs, and the presence of specific PF4-bearing platelet microparticles (PMPs). Anti-GAGs/PF4 IgG-IgA-IgM levels were significantly higher in septic patients than in control groups (healthy controls or acute patients without sepsis, p < 0.001). PF4-bearing PMP levels were only significantly higher in septic patients (p < 0.001). The occurrence of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs and PF4+ PMPs correlated with an improvement in patients’ sepsis. In conclusion, we demonstrated that, in the course of bacterial sepsis, platelet activation leads to the formation of specific PF4-bearing PMPs. These specific microparticles bind to polyanionic sequences on the surface of aerobic bacteria, giving rise to an antigenic complex that induces the early formation of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs as an innate immune response to infection. Full article

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that in most instances recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays (i.e., functional assays) are more specific than immunoassays, since they are able to discern clinically relevant heparin-induced antibodies. All functional assays used for HIT diagnosis share the same principle, as they assess the ability of serum/plasma from suspected HIT patients to activate fresh platelets from healthy donors in the presence of several concentrations of heparin. Depending on the assay, donors’ platelets are stimulated either in whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or in a buffer medium (washed platelets, WP). In addition, the activation endpoint studied varies from one assay to another: platelet aggregation, membrane expression of markers of platelet activation, release of platelet granules. Tests with WP are more sensitive and serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered to be the current gold standard, but functional assays suffer from certain limitations regarding their sensitivity, specificity, complexity, and/or accessibility. However, the strict adherence to adequate preanalytical conditions, the use of selected platelet donors and the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run are key points that ensure their performances. Full article