Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = high ambiguity driven protein–protein docking

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 7360 KB  
Article
Class 1 Sugar Beet Phytoglobin Shows Strong Affinity to Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and DNA In Vitro
by Leonard Groth, Miho Oda and Leif Bülow
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(19), 9404; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199404 - 26 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 563
Abstract
Class 1 phytoglobins (Pgbs) are known for their multifunctional roles in plant stress responses, with recent studies suggesting broader interactions involving metabolic and transcriptional regulation. Interestingly, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) moonlights in many roles in colocalized spaces during cellular stress that are strikingly suitable [...] Read more.
Class 1 phytoglobins (Pgbs) are known for their multifunctional roles in plant stress responses, with recent studies suggesting broader interactions involving metabolic and transcriptional regulation. Interestingly, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) moonlights in many roles in colocalized spaces during cellular stress that are strikingly suitable for supporting Pgb function. This study investigates the molecular interactions of class 1 Pgb from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), BvPgb 1.2, and an alanine-substituted mutant (C86A), focusing on their ability to bind GAPDH and DNA. Using dual-emission isothermal spectral shift (SpS) analysis, we report strong binding interactions with GAPDH, with dissociation constants (KD) of 260 ± 50 nM for the recombinant wild-type protein (rWT) and a significantly stronger affinity for C86A (120 ± 40 nM), suggesting that the cysteine residue limits the interaction. Remarkably strong DNA-binding affinities were also observed for both variants, displaying biphasic binding. This behavior is characteristic of hexacoordinated globins and reflects the presence of two distinct species: a fast-reacting open pentacoordinated form and a slow-reacting closed hexacoordinated form with high apparent affinity. Here, the KD in the open configuration was 120 ± 50 nm and 50 ± 20 nM for rWT and C86A, respectively. In the closed configuration, however, the cysteine appears to support the interaction, as the KD was measured at 100 ± 10 pM and 230 ± 60 pM for rWT and C86A, respectively. Protein–protein docking studies reinforced these findings, revealing electrostatically driven interactions between BvPgb 1.2 and GAPDH, characterized by a substantial buried surface area indicative of a stable, biologically relevant complex. Protein–DNA docking similarly confirmed energetically favorable binding near the heme pocket without obstructing ligand accessibility. Together, these findings indicate a potential regulatory role for BvPgb 1.2 through its interaction with GAPDH and DNA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 9886 KB  
Article
An In Silico Design of Peptides Targeting the S1/S2 Cleavage Site of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
by Chian Ho, Wan Fahmi Wan Mohamad Nazarie and Ping-Chin Lee
Viruses 2023, 15(9), 1930; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15091930 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2430
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, invades host cells via its spike protein, which includes critical binding regions, such as the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the S1/S2 cleavage site, the S2 cleavage site, and heptad-repeat (HR) sections. Peptides targeting the RBD and HR1 inhibit [...] Read more.
SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, invades host cells via its spike protein, which includes critical binding regions, such as the receptor-binding domain (RBD), the S1/S2 cleavage site, the S2 cleavage site, and heptad-repeat (HR) sections. Peptides targeting the RBD and HR1 inhibit binding to host ACE2 receptors and the formation of the fusion core. Other peptides target proteases, such as TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L, to prevent the cleavage of the S protein. However, research has largely ignored peptides targeting the S1/S2 cleavage site. In this study, bioinformatics was used to investigate the binding of the S1/S2 cleavage site to host proteases, including furin, trypsin, TMPRSS2, matriptase, cathepsin B, and cathepsin L. Peptides targeting the S1/S2 site were designed by identifying binding residues. Peptides were docked to the S1/S2 site using HADDOCK (High-Ambiguity-Driven protein–protein DOCKing). Nine peptides with the lowest HADDOCK scores and strong binding affinities were selected, which was followed by molecular dynamics simulations (MDSs) for further investigation. Among these peptides, BR582 and BR599 stand out. They exhibited relatively high interaction energies with the S protein at −1004.769 ± 21.2 kJ/mol and −1040.334 ± 24.1 kJ/mol, respectively. It is noteworthy that the binding of these peptides to the S protein remained stable during the MDSs. In conclusion, this research highlights the potential of peptides targeting the S1/S2 cleavage site as a means to prevent SARS-CoV-2 from entering cells, and contributes to the development of therapeutic interventions against COVID-19. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 1442 KB  
Article
Deconvolution of the MBP-Bri2 Interaction by a Yeast Two Hybrid System and Synergy of the AlphaFold2 and High Ambiguity Driven Protein-Protein Docking
by Evgeniya V. Smirnova, Tatiana V. Rakitina, George A. Saratov, Anna A. Kudriaeva and Alexey A. Belogurov
Crystals 2022, 12(2), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020197 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4354
Abstract
Myelin basic protein (MBP) is one of the key proteins in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, very few intracellular MBP partners have been identified up to now. In order to find proteins interacting with MBP in the brain, an expression library [...] Read more.
Myelin basic protein (MBP) is one of the key proteins in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, very few intracellular MBP partners have been identified up to now. In order to find proteins interacting with MBP in the brain, an expression library from the human brain was screened using a yeast two-hybrid system. Here we showed that MBP interacts with the C-terminal 24-residue peptide of Integral transmembrane protein II associated with familial British and Danish dementia (ITM2B/Bri2 or Bri2). This peptide (Bri23R) was one residue longer than the known Bri23 peptide, which is cleaved from the C-terminus of Bri2 during its maturation in the Golgi and has physiological activity as a modulator of amyloid precursor protein processing. Since the spatial structures for both MBP and Bri2 were not known, we used computational methods of structural biology including an artificial intelligence system AlphaFold2 and high ambiguity driven protein-protein docking (HADDOCK 2.1) to gain a mechanistic explanation of the found protein-protein interaction and elucidate a possible structure of the complex of MBP with Bri23R peptide. As expected, MBP was mostly unstructured, although it has well-defined α-helical regions, while Bri23R forms a stable β-hairpin. Simulation of the interaction between MBP and Bri23R in two different environments, as parts of the two-hybrid system fusion proteins and in the form of single polypeptides, showed that MBP twists around Bri23R. The observed interaction results in the adjustment of the size of the internal space between MBP α-helices to the size of the β-hairpin of Bri23R. Since Bri23 is known to inhibit aggregation of amyloid oligomers, and the association of MBP to the inner leaflet of the membrane bilayer shares features with amyloid fibril formation, Bri23 may serve as a peptide chaperon for MBP, thus participating in myelin membrane assembly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Crystallography: Achievements and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3526 KB  
Article
NMR Fragment-Based Screening against Tandem RNA Recognition Motifs of TDP-43
by Gilbert Nshogoza, Yaqian Liu, Jia Gao, Mingqing Liu, Sayed Ala Moududee, Rongsheng Ma, Fudong Li, Jiahai Zhang, Jihui Wu, Yunyu Shi and Ke Ruan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(13), 3230; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133230 - 30 Jun 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5942
Abstract
The TDP-43 is originally a nuclear protein but translocates to the cytoplasm in the pathological condition. TDP-43, as an RNA-binding protein, consists of two RNA Recognition Motifs (RRM1 and RRM2). RRMs are known to involve both protein-nucleotide and protein-protein interactions and mediate the [...] Read more.
The TDP-43 is originally a nuclear protein but translocates to the cytoplasm in the pathological condition. TDP-43, as an RNA-binding protein, consists of two RNA Recognition Motifs (RRM1 and RRM2). RRMs are known to involve both protein-nucleotide and protein-protein interactions and mediate the formation of stress granules. Thus, they assist the entire TDP-43 protein with participating in neurodegenerative and cancer diseases. Consequently, they are potential therapeutic targets. Protein-observed and ligand-observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy were used to uncover the small molecule inhibitors against the tandem RRM of TDP-43. We identified three hits weakly binding the tandem RRMs using the ligand-observed NMR fragment-based screening. The binding topology of these hits is then depicted by chemical shift perturbations (CSP) of the 15N-labeled tandem RRM and RRM2, respectively, and modeled by the CSP-guided High Ambiguity Driven biomolecular DOCKing (HADDOCK). These hits mainly bind to the RRM2 domain, which suggests the druggability of the RRM2 domain of TDP-43. These hits also facilitate further studies regarding the hit-to-lead evolution against the TDP-43 RRM domain. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop