Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = haemoperfusion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1999 KiB  
Article
Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience
by Mohamed El Gabry, Sven Arends, Sharaf-Eldin Shehada, Harald Lahner, Markus Kamler, Daniel Wendt and Konstantina Spetsotaki
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(10), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100413 - 1 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2382
Abstract
Background: Hedinger syndrome (HS) or carcinoid heart disease (CD) is a rare and challenging manifestation of malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) involving the heart. We aimed to report our experience with surgical strategies and midterm results in HS patients. Methods: Eleven patients (58 ± [...] Read more.
Background: Hedinger syndrome (HS) or carcinoid heart disease (CD) is a rare and challenging manifestation of malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) involving the heart. We aimed to report our experience with surgical strategies and midterm results in HS patients. Methods: Eleven patients (58 ± 11 (range 41 to 79 years); 5 females) with HS who underwent cardiac surgery in our department between 07/2005 and 05/2023 were analysed. Results: All patients showed a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV and in all the tricuspid valve (TV) was involved. Four patients received a TV replacement, and three TV reconstruction. Recently, to preserve the geometry and function of the compromised right ventricle (RV), we have applied the TV “bio-prosthesis in native-valve” implantation technique with the preservation of the valve apparatus (tricuspid valve implantation: TVI) in four cases. Concomitant procedures included pulmonary valve replacement in four, pulmonary implantation in one, and aortic valve replacement in three cases. To treat RV failure, we adapted a combined TandemHeart®-CytoSorb® haemoperfusion strategy in Patient #10 and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support avoidance, after experiencing an ECMO-induced carcinoid-storm-related death in Patient #8. Mortality at 30 days was 18% (2/11). The median follow up was 2 ± 2.1 years (range 1 month to 6 years) with an overall mortality during the follow-up period of 72.7% (8/11). Conclusions: HS surgery, despite being a high-risk procedure, can efficiently prolong survival, and represents a safe and feasible procedure. However, patient selection seems to be crucial. Further follow up and larger cohorts are needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 508 KiB  
Review
Dialysis Membranes for Acute Kidney Injury
by Yanuardi Raharjo, Muhammad Nidzhom Zainol Abidin, Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, Mochamad Zakki Fahmi, Saiful, Muthia Elma, Djoko Santoso, Hamizah Haula’ and Ahlan Riwahyu Habibi
Membranes 2022, 12(3), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030325 - 15 Mar 2022
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 8612
Abstract
Mortality and morbidity rates among critically ill septic patients having acute kidney injury (AKI) are very high, considering the total number of deaths after their admission. Inappropriate selection of the type of continuous renal replacement therapy and inadequate therapy become the immediate causes [...] Read more.
Mortality and morbidity rates among critically ill septic patients having acute kidney injury (AKI) are very high, considering the total number of deaths after their admission. Inappropriate selection of the type of continuous renal replacement therapy and inadequate therapy become the immediate causes of these issues. Dialysis is a commonly used treatment intended to prolong the life of AKI patients. Dialysis membranes, which are the core of dialysis treatment, must be properly selected to ensure fair treatment to the patients. The accumulation of certain types of molecules must be dealt with using the right membrane. Whether it is low-flux, high-flux, or adsorptive type, the dialysis membrane should be chosen depending on the condition of the patients. The selection of dialysis membranes should also be based on their effect on the treatment outcomes and well-being. All these options are needed to serve the patients of different clinical settings. The use of dialysis membranes is not restricted to conventional haemodialysis, but rather they can be employed in haemoperfusion, haemofiltration, haemodiafiltration, or a combination of any two of them. This review focuses in-depth on different types of dialysis membranes, their characteristics, and approaches in addressing the issues encountered in patients having AKI with sepsis and/or multiorgan failure in intensive care units. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mixed Matrix Membranes for Molecular Separations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop