Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = global yield gap atlas (GYGA)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3709 KiB  
Article
A Common Climate–Yield Relationship for Wheat and Barley in Japan and the United Kingdom
by Shoko Ishikawa, Takahiro Nakashima, Martin C. Hare and Peter S. Kettlewell
Climate 2024, 12(8), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080125 - 20 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1995
Abstract
Wheat and barley yields in Japan are considerably lower than those in the UK, even where similar Climate Zones (CZs) of relatively cold and humid nature are shared. In order to understand this difference, it is first necessary to find out if any [...] Read more.
Wheat and barley yields in Japan are considerably lower than those in the UK, even where similar Climate Zones (CZs) of relatively cold and humid nature are shared. In order to understand this difference, it is first necessary to find out if any common climate–yield relationship exists between the two countries. The Climate Zonation Scheme (CZS) developed in the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA) was used to analyse actual yield (Ya) with three climatic factors of the GYGA-CZS, i.e., growing degree days (GDD), aridity index (AI) and temperature seasonality (TS). A significant relationship was found between AI scores and Ya values across the two countries. Ya values decreased with an increase in AI scores; in other words, lower yields are associated with higher AI scores. In addition, the degree of yield reduction with the rise in AI scores was greater in Japan than in the UK. The present study also proposed a novel method to link CZs of the GYGA-CZS to regional classification units, especially for countries where statistical crop yield data are available only at a coarse scale. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4786 KiB  
Article
Demonstrating the Use of the Yield-Gap Concept on Crop Model Calibration in Data-Poor Regions: An Application to CERES-Wheat Crop Model in Greece
by Melpomeni Nikou and Theodoros Mavromatis
Land 2023, 12(7), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071372 - 8 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2110
Abstract
Yield estimations at global or regional spatial scales have been compromised due to poor crop model calibration. A methodology for estimating the genetic parameters related to grain growth and yield for the CERES-Wheat crop model is proposed based on yield gap concept, the [...] Read more.
Yield estimations at global or regional spatial scales have been compromised due to poor crop model calibration. A methodology for estimating the genetic parameters related to grain growth and yield for the CERES-Wheat crop model is proposed based on yield gap concept, the GLUE coefficient estimator, and the global yield gap atlas (GYGA). Yield trials with three durum wheat cultivars in an experimental farm in northern Greece from 2004 to 2010 were used. The calibration strategy conducted with CERES-Wheat (embedded in DSSAT v.4.7.5) on potential mode taking into account the year-to-year variability of relative yield gap Yrg (YgC_adj) was: (i) more effective than using the average site value of Yrg (YgC_unadj) only (the relative RMSE ranged from 10 to 13% for the YgC_adj vs. 48 to 57% for YgC_unadj) and (ii) superior (slightly inferior) to the strategy conducted with DSSAT v.4.7.5 (DSSAT v.3.5—relative RMSE of 5 to 8% were found) on rainfed mode. Earlier anthesis, maturity, and decreased potential yield (from 2.2 to 3.9% for 2021–2050, and from 5.0 to 7.1% for 2071–2100), due to increased temperature and solar radiation, were found using an ensemble of 11 EURO-CORDEX regional climate model simulations. In conclusion, the proposed strategy provides a scientifically robust guideline for crop model calibration that minimizes input requirements due to operating the crop model on potential mode. Further testing of this methodology is required with different plants, crop models, and environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop