Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = genocide tracking

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 7848 KB  
Review
Remote Sensing for International Peace and Security: Its Role and Implications
by Ram Avtar, Asma Kouser, Ashwani Kumar, Deepak Singh, Prakhar Misra, Ankita Gupta, Ali P. Yunus, Pankaj Kumar, Brian Alan Johnson, Rajarshi Dasgupta, Netrananda Sahu and Andi Besse Rimba
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(3), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030439 - 27 Jan 2021
Cited by 56 | Viewed by 19412
Abstract
Remote sensing technology has seen a massive rise in popularity over the last two decades, becoming an integral part of our lives. Space-based satellite technologies facilitated access to the inaccessible terrains, helped humanitarian teams, support complex emergencies, and contributed to monitoring and verifying [...] Read more.
Remote sensing technology has seen a massive rise in popularity over the last two decades, becoming an integral part of our lives. Space-based satellite technologies facilitated access to the inaccessible terrains, helped humanitarian teams, support complex emergencies, and contributed to monitoring and verifying conflict zones. The scoping phase of this review investigated the utility of the role of remote sensing application to complement international peace and security activities owing to their ability to provide objective near real-time insights at the ground level. The first part of this review looks into the major research concepts and implementation of remote sensing-based techniques for international peace and security applications and presented a meta-analysis on how advanced sensor capabilities can support various aspects of peace and security. With key examples, we demonstrated how this technology assemblage enacts multiple versions of peace and security: for refugee relief operations, in armed conflicts monitoring, tracking acts of genocide, providing evidence in courts of law, and assessing contravention in human rights. The second part of this review anticipates future challenges that can hinder the applicative capabilities of remote sensing in peace and security. Varying types of sensors pose discrepancies in image classifications and issues like cost, resolution, and difficulty of ground-truth in conflict areas. With emerging technologies and sufficient secondary resources available, remote sensing plays a vital operational tool in conflict-affected areas by supporting an extensive diversity in public policy actions for peacekeeping processes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 723 KB  
Article
Eye-Tracking and Learning Experience: Gaze Trajectories to Better Understand the Behavior of Memorial Visitors
by Salma Mesmoudi, Stanislas Hommet and Denis Peschanski
J. Eye Mov. Res. 2020, 13(2), 1-15; https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.3 - 16 May 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 617
Abstract
Eye-tracking technology is increasingly introduced in museums to assess their role in learning and knowledge transfer. However, their use provide limited quantitative and/or qualitative measures such as viewing time and/or gaze trajectory on an isolated object or image (Region of Interest “ROI”). The [...] Read more.
Eye-tracking technology is increasingly introduced in museums to assess their role in learning and knowledge transfer. However, their use provide limited quantitative and/or qualitative measures such as viewing time and/or gaze trajectory on an isolated object or image (Region of Interest “ROI”). The aim of this work is to evaluate the potential of the mobile eye-tracking to quantify the students’ experience and behaviors through their visit of the “Genocide and mass violence” area of the Caen memorial. In this study, we collected eye-tracking data from 17 students during their visit to the memorial. In addition, all visitors filled out a questionnaire before the visit, and a focus group was conducted before and after the visit. The first results of this study allowed us to analyze the viewing time spent by each visitor in front of 19-selected ROIs, and some of their specific sub-parts. The other important result was the reconstruction of the gaze trajectory through these ROIs. Our global trajectory approach allowed to complete the information obtained from an isolated ROI, and to identify some behaviors such as avoidance. Clustering analysis revealed some typical trajectories performed by specific sub-groups. The eye-tracking results were consolidated by the participants’ answers during the focus group. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop