Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 3391 KiB  
Systematic Review
Endoscopic Clipping Versus Suturing for Mucosotomy Closure in E-POEM and G-POEM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Yash R. Shah, Ernesto Calderon-Martinez, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Saurabh Chandan, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Mihir Shah, Hassam Ali, Amir H. Sohail, Sumant Inamdar and Rashmi Advani
Gastrointest. Disord. 2025, 7(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7010025 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 742
Abstract
Background and Aims: Endoscopic clipping is the standard method for mucosotomy closure in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM). Concerns remain regarding potential leaks and long-term complications. This meta-analysis compares the technical success rates and outcomes of endoscopic [...] Read more.
Background and Aims: Endoscopic clipping is the standard method for mucosotomy closure in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM). Concerns remain regarding potential leaks and long-term complications. This meta-analysis compares the technical success rates and outcomes of endoscopic clipping and suturing for mucosotomy closure in E-POEM/G-POEM. Methods: A systematic search of databases for studies comparing endoscopic clipping and suturing in E-POEM/G-POEM was conducted. The primary outcomes were technical success rates, and the secondary outcomes were cost, procedure time, and complications. Meta-analyses and sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: Three studies with a total of 91 patients were included. The technical success rates were similar between suturing and clipping, with a success rate of 100% (48/48) for suturing and 94.4% (41/43) for clipping (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.89–1.19, p = 0.50). There was no significant difference in procedure time between the two methods (SMD −0.73; CI: −1.70 to 0.23; p = 0.13). The cost of suturing was higher on average (mean: $1751, range: $873–$2353) compared to clipping (mean: $898, range: $703–$1083), but the difference was not statistically significant (SMD 1.85, CI −5.05 to 1.35, p = 0.25) with high heterogeneity. Complications for clipping and suturing were also comparable. Conclusions: Both endoscopic clipping and suturing achieve successful mucosotomy closure in E-POEM/G-POEM without any significant difference in the cost and the time between the two closure methods. Further investigation with larger, randomized, controlled trials are necessary to determine their roles in routine practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2365 KiB  
Article
Seven-Year Experience of Intramural Surgery in the Middle East: A Safety and Feasibility Analysis
by Gabriela Restrepo-Rodas, Juan S. Barajas-Gamboa, Jerry T. Dang, Maja I. Piechowska-Jóźwiak, Mohammed Khan, Gabriel Diaz Del Gobbo, Mohammed Abdallah, Cristobal Moreno, Carlos Abril, Juan Pablo Pantoja, Alfredo D. Guerron, Ricard Corcelles, Matthew Kroh and John Rodriguez
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3989; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133989 - 8 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1511
Abstract
Background: Intramural surgery techniques, particularly esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM), gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s (Z-POEM), have emerged as forefront minimally invasive endoscopic procedures. While several studies have reported on the outcomes in North America and Asia, [...] Read more.
Background: Intramural surgery techniques, particularly esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM), gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s (Z-POEM), have emerged as forefront minimally invasive endoscopic procedures. While several studies have reported on the outcomes in North America and Asia, evidence in the Middle East and North Africa remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intramural surgery techniques within this region. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with approval from the institutional review board. All patients who underwent esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy, gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy, and peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s from January 2016 to August 2023 were included. Results: In total, 119 patients underwent intramural surgery procedures during this period. The esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy group had 81 (68%) patients, the gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy had 34 (28.6%) patients, and the peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker’s had 4 (3.4%) patients. The full cohort was 48.7% female, with a mean overall age of 40.5 years. The mean overall body mass index was 27.5 kg/m2. The chief complaint was dysphagia (n = 80, 67.2%). All cases were successfully completed endoscopically. During the first 30 days, the most common complications were nausea/vomiting requiring admission (n = 4, 4.76%) and pneumomediastinum (n = 2, 2.38%). At a follow-up of 19 months, there were four mortalities; the causes of death were cardiac arrest (three cases) and end-stage prostate cancer (one case). Conclusions: Intramural surgery techniques are safe and technically feasible with low complication rates. Our study suggests that clinical success in the Middle East and Northern Africa population is comparable to larger international series. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1068 KiB  
Review
Imaging in Gastroparesis: Exploring Innovative Diagnostic Approaches, Symptoms, and Treatment
by Francesco Vito Mandarino, Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni, Alberto Barchi, Francesco Azzolini, Emanuele Sinagra, Gino Pepe, Arturo Chiti and Silvio Danese
Life 2023, 13(8), 1743; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081743 - 14 Aug 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 8402
Abstract
Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic disease characterized by upper gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily nausea and vomiting, and delayed gastric emptying (GE), in the absence of mechanical GI obstruction. The underlying pathophysiology of GP remains unclear, but factors contributing to the condition include vagal nerve [...] Read more.
Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic disease characterized by upper gastrointestinal symptoms, primarily nausea and vomiting, and delayed gastric emptying (GE), in the absence of mechanical GI obstruction. The underlying pathophysiology of GP remains unclear, but factors contributing to the condition include vagal nerve dysfunction, impaired gastric fundic accommodation, antral hypomotility, gastric dysrhythmias, and pyloric dysfunction. Currently, gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is considered the gold standard for GP diagnosis. However, the overall delay in GE weakly correlates with GP symptoms and their severity. Recent research efforts have focused on developing treatments that address the presumed underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of GP, such as pyloric hypertonicity, with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) one of these procedures. New promising diagnostic tools for gastroparesis include wireless motility capsule (WMC), the 13 carbon-GE breath test, high-resolution electrogastrography, and the Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP). Some of these tools assess alterations beyond GE, such as muscular electrical activity and pyloric tone. These modalities have the potential to characterize the pathophysiology of gastroparesis, identifying patients who may benefit from targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on diagnostic pathways in GP, with a focus on the association between diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging of Gastrointestinal Diseases: Issues and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1408 KiB  
Review
Updates in the Field of Submucosal Endoscopy
by Tadateru Maehata, Yoshinori Sato, Yusuke Nakamoto, Masaki Kato, Akiyo Kawashima, Hirofumi Kiyokawa, Hiroshi Yasuda, Hiroyuki Yamamoto and Keisuke Tateishi
Life 2023, 13(1), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010104 - 30 Dec 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2771
Abstract
Submucosal endoscopy (third-space endoscopy) can be defined as an endoscopic procedure performed in the submucosal space. This procedure is novel and has been utilized for delivery to the submucosal space in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases, such as a tumor, achalasia, gastroparesis, and [...] Read more.
Submucosal endoscopy (third-space endoscopy) can be defined as an endoscopic procedure performed in the submucosal space. This procedure is novel and has been utilized for delivery to the submucosal space in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases, such as a tumor, achalasia, gastroparesis, and subepithelial tumors. The main submucosal endoscopy includes peroral endoscopic myotomy, gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy, Zenker peroral endoscopic myotomy, submucosal tunneling for endoscopic resection, and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection. Submucosal endoscopy has been used as a viable alternative to surgical techniques because it is minimally invasive in the treatment and diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases and disorders. However, there is limited evidence to prove this. This article reviews the current applications and evidence regarding submucosal endoscopy while exploring the possible future clinical applications in this field. As our understanding of these procedures improves, the future of submucosal endoscopy could be promising in the fields of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Endoscopic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop