Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (FILDs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1974 KiB  
Article
Exercise-Induced Oxygen Desaturation and Outcomes After Nintedanib Therapy for Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients Without Dyspnea
by Masaki Okamoto, Toyoshi Yanagihara, Kiminori Fujimoto, Tomonori Chikasue, Kazuhiro Tabata, Yoshiaki Zaizen, Masaki Tominaga, Akiko Sumi, Yuuya Nishii, Norikazu Matsuo, Takashi Nouno, Shuji Matsuura, Atsushi Kawaguchi and Tomoaki Hoshino
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7865; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247865 - 23 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1217
Abstract
Background: The degree of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation and outcomes following antifibrotic drug therapy in asymptomatic patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) remain unclear. Methods: We compared clinical data, incidence of annual FILD progression, overall survival, and tolerability after initiating nintedanib between 58 [...] Read more.
Background: The degree of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation and outcomes following antifibrotic drug therapy in asymptomatic patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) remain unclear. Methods: We compared clinical data, incidence of annual FILD progression, overall survival, and tolerability after initiating nintedanib between 58 patients with dyspnea and 18 patients without. Annual FILD progression was defined as >10% decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC), >15% decrease in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), developing acute exacerbations, or FILD-related death within 1 year of starting nintedanib. Outcomes between the two groups were adjusted for covariates, including age, gender, FVC, DLCO, and diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, all known prognostic factors for FILD. Results: In 6-min walk test, incidence of decrease to <90% of SpO2 was significantly lower in non-dyspnea group than in dyspnea group (24% vs. 55%, p = 0.028), but incidence of >4% decreases showed no significant difference (71% vs. 89%, p = 0.11) The incidence of annual progression was significantly lower in non-dyspnea than in dyspnea group (17% vs. 53%, adjusted p = 0.026). The relative change in DLCO was significantly slower in non-dyspnea group (adjusted p = 0.036), but FVC was not (adjusted p = 0.067). Overall survival was longer in non-dyspnea group (adjusted p = 0.0089). The discontinuation rate and therapeutic period of nintedanib were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients with FILD have severe exercise-induced oxygen desaturation and better outcomes after nintedanib therapy than symptomatic patients. Antifibrotic drug therapy should not be avoided solely because of a lack of symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Interstitial Lung Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3014 KiB  
Article
Neutrophils and Lymphocytes: Yin and Yang of Lung Fibrosis and Patient Outcome in Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases
by Erika M. Novoa-Bolivar, José A. Ros, Sonia Pérez-Fernández, José A. Campillo, Ruth López-Hernández, Rosana González-López, Almudena Otalora-Alcaraz, Cristina Ortuño-Hernández, Lourdes Gimeno, Inmaculada Ruiz-Lorente, Diana Ceballos-Francisco, Manuel Muro, Pablo Martínez-Camblor and Alfredo Minguela
Biomedicines 2024, 12(11), 2439; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112439 - 24 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1464
Abstract
Objective: Antifibrotics can improve the outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), but predictive biomarkers at diagnosis are needed to guide the use of immunomodulating and antifibrotic therapies. Methods: Flow cytometry quantification of [...] Read more.
Objective: Antifibrotics can improve the outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), but predictive biomarkers at diagnosis are needed to guide the use of immunomodulating and antifibrotic therapies. Methods: Flow cytometry quantification of lymphocytes and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of 145 IPFs, 561 non-IPF-ILDs (125 F-ILDs), and 112 BAL controls were retrospectively correlated with the incidence of fibrosis and third-quartile overall survival (Q3–OS). Results: The incidence of IPF was directly proportional (9.6%, 22.2%, and 42.6%, p < 0.001) to BAL neutrophil counts (<5%, 5–15%, and >15%), but inversely proportional (34.1%, 18.6%, and 8.8%, p < 0.001) to BAL lymphocyte counts (<7%, 7–20%, and >20%). Elevated neutrophils (>5%) with low lymphocytes (<7%) were associated with an increasingly higher incidence of IPF (10.0–56.3%, p < 0.001) in patients aged 40 to 80, compared to the rest of patients (13.0–17.1%). Lymphocytes >20% compared to lymphocytes <7% strongly protected patients with neutrophils >15% (59.7% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) from IPF. In contrast, the incidence of F-ILD was not clearly related to BAL lymphocyte/neutrophil counts. Although, IPF and F-ILD showed a shorter Q3–OS (1.8 ± 0.3 and 4.6 ± 0.8 years; p < 0.001) than non-fibrotic-ILDs (11.1 ± 1.3 years), lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were associated with a longer and shorter Q3–OS of non-fibrotic-ILDs (p < 0.03) and F-ILDs (p < 0.04), respectively, but not with a Q3–OS of IPF patients (p < 0.708). Corticosteroids in patients with fibrosis showed a shorter Q3–OS than other immunomodulators (2.4 ± 0.3 vs. 4.0 ± 1.8 years, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Accurate counting of BAL lymphocytes and neutrophils by flow cytometry in ILD patients at diagnosis could help guide immunomodulatory and antifibrotic therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1553 KiB  
Review
Cell-Based Therapy for Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases, Current Status, and Potential Applications of iPSC-Derived Cells
by Yusuke Nakamura, Seiji Niho and Yasuo Shimizu
Cells 2024, 13(11), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13110893 - 22 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3513
Abstract
Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (FILDs), e.g., due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), are chronic progressive diseases with a poor prognosis. The management of these diseases is challenging and focuses mainly on the suppression of progression with anti-fibrotic drugs. Therefore, novel FILD treatments are [...] Read more.
Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (FILDs), e.g., due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), are chronic progressive diseases with a poor prognosis. The management of these diseases is challenging and focuses mainly on the suppression of progression with anti-fibrotic drugs. Therefore, novel FILD treatments are needed. In recent years, cell-based therapy with various stem cells has been investigated for FILD, and the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been widely reported and clinical studies are also ongoing. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have also been reported to have an anti-fibrotic effect in FILD; however, these have not been as well studied as MSCs in terms of the mechanisms and side effects. While MSCs show a potent anti-fibrotic effect, the possibility of quality differences between donors and a stable supply in the case of donor shortage or reduced proliferative capacity after cell passaging needs to be considered. The application of iPSC-derived cells has the potential to overcome these problems and may lead to consistent quality of the cell product and stable product supply. This review provides an overview of iPSCs and FILD, followed by the current status of cell-based therapy for FILD, and then discusses the possibilities and perspectives of FILD therapy with iPSC-derived cells. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2352 KiB  
Article
Clinical Characteristics and Disease Course of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Patients in a Real-World Setting
by Maritta Kilpeläinen, Tuuli Hirvonen, Katariina Perkonoja and Samuli Hirsjärvi
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020281 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3415
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This single-center retrospective study was conducted to describe clinical characteristics and the disease course of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with fibrosing ILD (IPF, non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD), and [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This single-center retrospective study was conducted to describe clinical characteristics and the disease course of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with fibrosing ILD (IPF, non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD), and non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF)) treated between 2014 and 2017. Patients were followed annually from the first visit until the end of the study period in 2019. Data were collected from the Turku University Hospital data lake and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 591 patients formed the patient cohort: 110 had IPF, 194 F-ILD, 142 PPF, and the remaining 145 patients were uncertain, F-ILD-U, whose disease progression nature could not be confirmed by FVC measurements. There were more males in each patient group and median age of the groups was similar, although there were younger patients in the PPF, F-ILD, and F-ILD-U groups. PPF patients had more UIP pattern than F-ILD patients. Exposure-related ILDs were clearly the most found ILD diagnoses for both PPF and F-ILD, followed by unclassifiable IIP. Baseline FVC % predicted reduction in every group was moderate. Half of the patients in each group had comorbidities, and the most common were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic lower respiratory diseases; F-ILD-U patients had malignant diseases as well. IPF patients had less medications than the other groups. Glucocorticoids were the most used medication in all patient groups. More PPF and F-ILD patients remained in the follow-up than IPF and F-ILD-U patients. Similarly, mortality of F-ILD-U was the highest, followed by IPF. Evolvement of lung function, oxygen use, and number of acute hospitalizations were similar for IPF and PPF patients whereas the corresponding results were always better for F-ILD patients. Conclusions: The disease course of IPF and PPF was similar, and PPF patient amount exceeded the amount of IPF patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovering the World of Rare Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
Early Intervention of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Is a Favorable Factor for Short-Term Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life
by Satoshi Matsuo, Masaki Okamoto, Tomoyuki Ikeuchi, Yoshiaki Zaizen, Atsushi Inomoto, Remi Haraguchi, Shunichiro Mori, Retsu Sasaki, Takashi Nouno, Tomohiro Tanaka, Tomoaki Hoshino and Toru Tsuda
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(14), 3153; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143153 - 16 Jul 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4150
Abstract
Patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) have poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We analyzed predictors of short-term improvement of HRQOL after starting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in moderate to severe FILD patients. This study involved 28 consecutive patients with FILD (20 males, [...] Read more.
Patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) have poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We analyzed predictors of short-term improvement of HRQOL after starting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in moderate to severe FILD patients. This study involved 28 consecutive patients with FILD (20 males, median age of 77.5 years), who participated in PR program of our hospital for >6 weeks. The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were evaluated before and after PR, and the predictors of efficacy of PR were analyzed. The duration from diagnosis of FILD to start of PR showed a positive correlation with the increase in the SGRQ score, and the baseline SGRQ score showed a negative correlation with increase in the 6MWD. The FILD subtype, modified Medical Research Council score, and treatment history were not associated with the endpoints. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, starting PR within 514 days after diagnosis of FILD was a significant favorable predictor of improvement in the SGRQ total score more than a minimal clinically important difference of 4. In this study, early intervention of PR and lower SGRQ score were associated with the favorable response to PR. PR for FILD should be initiated early before the disease becomes severe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research in Pulmonary Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 326 KiB  
Review
Progression in the Management of Non-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial Lung Diseases, Where Are We Now and Where We Would Like to Be
by Tinne Goos, Laurens J. De Sadeleer, Jonas Yserbyt, Geert M. Verleden, Marie Vermant, Stijn E. Verleden and Wim A. Wuyts
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(6), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061330 - 23 Mar 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4521
Abstract
A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function, progressive fibrosis on chest computed tomography and increased mortality. The clinical course in these patients mimics the relentless progressiveness [...] Read more.
A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function, progressive fibrosis on chest computed tomography and increased mortality. The clinical course in these patients mimics the relentless progressiveness of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Common pathophysiological mechanisms such as a shared genetic susceptibility and a common downstream pathway—self-sustaining fibroproliferation—support the concept of a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which is applicable to a broad range of non-IPF ILDs. While antifibrotic drugs became the standard of care in IPF, immunosuppressive agents are still the mainstay of treatment in non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD). However, recently, randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic treatment in systemic sclerosis-associated F-ILD and a broad range of F-ILDs with a progressive phenotype. This review summarizes the current pharmacological management and highlights the unmet needs in patients with non-IPF ILD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Perspective in Pulmonary Fibrosis)
10 pages, 266 KiB  
Perspective
Towards the Essence of Progressiveness: Bringing Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD) to the Next Stage
by Laurens J. De Sadeleer, Tinne Goos, Jonas Yserbyt and Wim A. Wuyts
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061722 - 3 Jun 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3567
Abstract
Although only recently introduced in the ILD community, the concept of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) has rapidly acquired an important place in the management of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD (nonIPF fILD) patients. It confirms a clinical gut feeling that an [...] Read more.
Although only recently introduced in the ILD community, the concept of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) has rapidly acquired an important place in the management of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD (nonIPF fILD) patients. It confirms a clinical gut feeling that an important subgroup of nonIPF fILD portends a dismal prognosis despite therapeutically addressing the alleged triggering event. Due to several recently published landmark papers showing a treatment benefit with currently available antifibrotic drugs in PF-ILD patients, endorsing a PF-ILD phenotype has vital therapeutic consequences. Importantly, defining progressiveness is based on former progression, which has proven to be a rather moderate predictor of future progression. As fibrosis extent >20% and the presence of honeycombing have superior predictive properties regarding future progression, we advocate immediate initiation of antifibrotic treatment in the presence of these risk factors. In this perspective, we describe the historical context wherein PF-ILD has emerged, determine the currently employed PF-ILD criteria and their inherent limitations and propose new directions to mature its definition. Finally, while ascertaining progression in a nonIPF fILD patient clearly demonstrates the need for (additional) therapy, in the future, therapeutic decisions should be taken after assessing which pathway is ultimately driving the progression. Although not readily available, pathophysiological insight and diagnostic means are emergent to go full steam ahead in this novel direction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Perspective in Pulmonary Fibrosis)
Back to TopTop