Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fibroelastic deficiency (FED)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1069 KiB  
Article
Mitral Valve Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation Results in Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Barlow’s Disease as Compared with Fibro-Elastic Deficiency
by Lobke L. Pype, Philippe B. Bertrand, Philippe Debonnaire, Sebastiaan Dhont, Boukje Hoekman, Bernard P. Paelinck, Dina De Bock, Hein Heidbuchel, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck and Caroline M. Van De Heyning
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(3), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11030071 - 21 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2284
Abstract
Surgical correction of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, whether this process is similar to the case in Barlow’s Disease (BD) and Fibro-elastic Deficiency (FED) is currently unknown. The aim of [...] Read more.
Surgical correction of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, whether this process is similar to the case in Barlow’s Disease (BD) and Fibro-elastic Deficiency (FED) is currently unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate post-operative LV reverse remodeling and function in patients with BD versus FED. In this study, 100 MVP patients (BD = 37 and FED = 63) with severe MR who underwent mitral valve surgery at three Belgian centers were retrospectively included. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to assess MR severity, LV volumes and function before surgery and 6 months thereafter. Baseline MR severity, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), indexed LV end-diastolic (LVEDVi) and end-systolic volumes (LVESVi) were not different between the groups. After a median follow-up of 278 days, there was a similar decrease in LVEDVi, but a trend towards a smaller decrease in LVESVi in BD compared to FED (−3.0 ± 11.2 mL/m2 vs. −5.3 ± 9.0 mL/m2; p = 0.154). This resulted in a significantly larger decrease in LVEF in BD (−8.3 ± 9.6%) versus FED (−3.9 ± 6.9%) after adjusting for baseline LVEF (p < 0.001) and type of surgical intervention (p = 0.01). These findings suggest that LV (reverse) remodeling in BD could be affected by other mechanisms beyond volume overload, potentially involving concomitant cardiomyopathy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1732 KiB  
Review
Characterization of Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease: Differences between Fibroelastic Deficiency and Barlow’s Disease
by Aniek L. van Wijngaarden, Boudewijn P. T. Kruithof, Tommaso Vinella, Daniela Q. C. M. Barge-Schaapveld and Nina Ajmone Marsan
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8020023 - 22 Feb 2021
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 9708
Abstract
Degenerative mitral valve disease causing mitral valve prolapse is the most common cause of primary mitral regurgitation, with two distinct phenotypes generally recognized with some major differences, i.e., fibroelastic deficiency (FED) and Barlow’s disease. The aim of this review was to describe the [...] Read more.
Degenerative mitral valve disease causing mitral valve prolapse is the most common cause of primary mitral regurgitation, with two distinct phenotypes generally recognized with some major differences, i.e., fibroelastic deficiency (FED) and Barlow’s disease. The aim of this review was to describe the main histological, clinical and echocardiographic features of patients with FED and Barlow’s disease, highlighting the differences in diagnosis, risk stratification and patient management, but also the still significant gaps in understanding the exact pathophysiology of these two phenotypes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitral Valve Development and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2121 KiB  
Article
Differential MicroRNA Expression Profile in Myxomatous Mitral Valve Prolapse and Fibroelastic Deficiency Valves
by Yei-Tsung Chen, Juan Wang, Abby S. Y. Wee, Quek-Wei Yong, Edgar Lik-Wui Tay, Chin Cheng Woo, Vitaly Sorokin, Arthur Mark Richards and Lieng-Hsi Ling
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(5), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050753 - 18 May 2016
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5993
Abstract
Myxomatous mitral valve prolapse (MMVP) and fibroelastic deficiency (FED) are two common variants of degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD), which is a leading cause of mitral regurgitation worldwide. While pathohistological studies have revealed differences in extracellular matrix content in MMVP and FED, the [...] Read more.
Myxomatous mitral valve prolapse (MMVP) and fibroelastic deficiency (FED) are two common variants of degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD), which is a leading cause of mitral regurgitation worldwide. While pathohistological studies have revealed differences in extracellular matrix content in MMVP and FED, the molecular mechanisms underlying these two disease entities remain to be elucidated. By using surgically removed valvular specimens from MMVP and FED patients that were categorized on the basis of echocardiographic, clinical and operative findings, a cluster of microRNAs that expressed differentially were identified. The expressions of has-miR-500, -3174, -17, -1193, -646, -1273e, -4298, -203, -505, and -939 showed significant differences between MMVP and FED after applying Bonferroni correction (p < 0.002174). The possible involvement of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of DMVD were further suggested by the presences of in silico predicted target sites on a number of genes reported to be involved in extracellular matrix homeostasis and marker genes for cellular composition of mitral valves, including decorin (DCN), aggrecan (ACAN), fibromodulin (FMOD), α actin 2 (ACTA2), extracellular matrix protein 2 (ECM2), desmin (DES), endothelial cell specific molecule 1 (ESM1), and platelet/ endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1), as well as inverse correlations of selected microRNA and mRNA expression in MMVP and FED groups. Our results provide evidence that distinct molecular mechanisms underlie MMVP and FED. Moreover, the microRNAs identified may be targets for the future development of diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNA in Various Disease States as Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop