Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fasting-refeeding schedule

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 2286 KB  
Article
Identification of Yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus latus) Gcga and Gcgb Genes and Effects of Fasting Strategies on Their Expression
by Jiang Zhou, Baosuo Liu, Huayang Guo, Nan Zhang, Lin Xian, Qin Zhang, Kecheng Zhu and Dianchang Zhang
Fishes 2026, 11(4), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11040205 - 28 Mar 2026
Viewed by 393
Abstract
The yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus latus) is an important aquaculture species, yet endocrine gene regulation during practical fasting and feeding schedules remains poorly understood. Here, we identified and characterized two duplicated proglucagon genes (Gcga and Gcgb) and examined tissue distribution [...] Read more.
The yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus latus) is an important aquaculture species, yet endocrine gene regulation during practical fasting and feeding schedules remains poorly understood. Here, we identified and characterized two duplicated proglucagon genes (Gcga and Gcgb) and examined tissue distribution of expression and transcriptional responses to feeding-related challenges. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses confirmed that Gcga and Gcgb cluster with teleost proglucagon paralogs and contain conserved peptide domains. Both genes were broadly expressed, with the strongest relative qRT-PCR signal detected in brain and fin, while other tissues (including intestine, gill, stomach, and liver) showed comparatively low but detectable expression. Because the liver is a central metabolic organ and displayed reproducible feeding-dependent regulation, we further quantified hepatic transcription under two paradigms. In a short-term starvation–refeeding trial, hepatic Gcga was significantly suppressed during fasting and rebounded after refeeding, whereas Gcgb showed a distinct, weaker response. In an acute peri-feeding assay, hepatic Gcga and Gcgb displayed rapid but differential regulation around meal time, and Gcgb expression differed between feeding and non-feeding groups. Together, these results support transcriptional divergence between the two proglucagon paralogs in nutritional regulation within a liver-focused metabolic-response model. Our findings provide baseline molecular information for A. latus and offer endocrine insights relevant to evaluating feeding strategies in aquaculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Biotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5041 KB  
Article
Coding and Noncoding Genes Involved in Atrophy and Compensatory Muscle Growth in Nile Tilapia
by Ali Ali, Walaa M. Shaalan, Rafet Al-Tobasei and Mohamed Salem
Cells 2022, 11(16), 2504; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162504 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3687
Abstract
Improvements in growth-related traits reduce fish time and production costs to reach market size. Feed deprivation and refeeding cycles have been introduced to maximize aquaculture profits through compensatory growth. However, the molecular compensatory growth signature is still uncertain in Nile tilapia. In this [...] Read more.
Improvements in growth-related traits reduce fish time and production costs to reach market size. Feed deprivation and refeeding cycles have been introduced to maximize aquaculture profits through compensatory growth. However, the molecular compensatory growth signature is still uncertain in Nile tilapia. In this study, fish were subjected to two weeks of fasting followed by two weeks of refeeding. The growth curve in refed tilapia was suggestive of a partial compensatory response. Transcriptome profiling of starved and refed fish was conducted to identify genes regulating muscle atrophy and compensatory growth. Pairwise comparisons revealed 5009 and 478 differentially expressed (differential) transcripts during muscle atrophy and recovery, respectively. Muscle atrophy appears to be mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy/lysosome systems. Autophagy-related 2A, F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7, F-box only protein 32, miR-137, and miR-153 showed exceptional high expression suggesting them as master regulators of muscle atrophy. On the other hand, the muscle compensatory growth response appears to be mediated by the continuous stimulation of muscle hypertrophy which exceeded normal levels found in control fish. For instance, genes promoting ribosome biogenesis or enhancing the efficiency of translational machinery were upregulated in compensatory muscle growth. Additionally, myogenic microRNAs (e.g., miR-1 and miR-206), and hypertrophy-associated microRNAs (e.g., miR-27a-3p, miR-29c, and miR-29c) were reciprocally expressed to favor hypertrophy during muscle recovery. Overall, the present study provided insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating muscle mass in fish. The study pinpoints extensive growth-related gene networks that could be used to inform breeding programs and also serve as valuable genomic resources for future mechanistic studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop