Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = eye-fixation related potential (EFRP)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 2784 KB  
Article
Recurrent Neural Network to Predict Saccade Offset Time Points from Electrooculogram Signals for Automatic Measurement of Eye-Fixation-Related Potential
by Takuma Saga, Hiroki Watanabe and Yasushi Naruse
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 6230; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106230 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2304
Abstract
Eye-fixation-related potential (EFRP)—an event-related potential that is time-locked to the saccade offset (SO)—can be measured without synchronizing with time when external stimuli occur. Such an advantage in measurement enables the mean amplitude of the EFRP to be used to estimate the cognitive workload, [...] Read more.
Eye-fixation-related potential (EFRP)—an event-related potential that is time-locked to the saccade offset (SO)—can be measured without synchronizing with time when external stimuli occur. Such an advantage in measurement enables the mean amplitude of the EFRP to be used to estimate the cognitive workload, which is known to change the amplitude, under real-world conditions. However, to observe EFRPs reliably, the SO timing must be correctly and consistently determined in milliseconds owing to the high temporal resolution of the electroencephalogram (EEG). As the electrooculogram (EOG) is commonly measured simultaneously with the EEG and the SO timing is reflected as a steep change in the waveforms, attempts have been made to determine the SO timing from EOG signals visually (the VD method). However, the SO timing detected by the VD method may be inconsistent across trials. We propose a gated recurrent unit—a recurrent neural network model—to detect the SO timing from EOGs consistently and automatically. We used EOG data from a task that mimics visual inspections, in which participants periodically traversed their eyes from left to right, for the model training. As a result, the amplitudes of the EFRPs based on the proposed method were significantly larger than those based on the VD method and the previous automatic method. This suggests that the proposed method can prevent the decrease in EFRP amplitudes owing to the inconsistent determination of the SO timing and increase the applicability of cognitive workload estimation using the EFRP in real-world environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4071 KB  
Article
Examination of Driver Visual and Cognitive Responses to Billboard Elicited Passive Distraction Using Eye-Fixation Related Potential
by Yongxiang Wang, William Clifford, Charles Markham and Catherine Deegan
Sensors 2021, 21(4), 1471; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041471 - 20 Feb 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 6373
Abstract
Distractions external to a vehicle contribute to visual attention diversion that may cause traffic accidents. As a low-cost and efficient advertising solution, billboards are widely installed on side of the road, especially the motorway. However, the effect of billboards on driver distraction, eye [...] Read more.
Distractions external to a vehicle contribute to visual attention diversion that may cause traffic accidents. As a low-cost and efficient advertising solution, billboards are widely installed on side of the road, especially the motorway. However, the effect of billboards on driver distraction, eye gaze, and cognition has not been fully investigated. This study utilises a customised driving simulator and synchronised electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking system to investigate the cognitive processes relating to the processing of driver visual information. A distinction is made between eye gaze fixations relating to stimuli that assist driving and others that may be a source of distraction. The study compares the driver’s cognitive responses to fixations on billboards with fixations on the vehicle dashboard. The measured eye-fixation related potential (EFRP) shows that the P1 components are similar; however, the subsequent N1 and P2 components differ. In addition, an EEG motor response is observed when the driver makes an adjustment of driving speed when prompted by speed limit signs. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measurement system is a valid tool in assessing driver cognition and suggests the cognitive level of engagement to the billboard is likely to be a precursor to driver distraction. The experimental results are compared with the human information processing model found in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Sensors Technologies in Ireland 2020)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 20064 KB  
Article
Eye Fixation-Related Potentials during Visual Search on Acquaintance and Newly-Learned Faces
by Seungji Lee, Doyoung Lee, Hyunjae Gil, Ian Oakley, Yang Seok Cho and Sung-Phil Kim
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(2), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020218 - 10 Feb 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3936
Abstract
Searching familiar faces in the crowd may involve stimulus-driven attention by emotional significance, together with goal-directed attention due to task-relevant needs. The present study investigated the effect of familiarity on attentional processes by exploring eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) and eye gazes when humans [...] Read more.
Searching familiar faces in the crowd may involve stimulus-driven attention by emotional significance, together with goal-directed attention due to task-relevant needs. The present study investigated the effect of familiarity on attentional processes by exploring eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) and eye gazes when humans searched for, among other distracting faces, either an acquaintance’s face or a newly-learned face. Task performance and gaze behavior were indistinguishable for identifying either faces. However, from the EFRP analysis, after a P300 component for successful search of target faces, we found greater deflections of right parietal late positive potentials in response to newly-learned faces than acquaintance’s faces, indicating more involvement of goal-directed attention in processing newly-learned faces. In addition, we found greater occipital negativity elicited by acquaintance’s faces, reflecting emotional responses to significant stimuli. These results may suggest that finding a familiar face in the crowd would involve lower goal-directed attention and elicit more emotional responses. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 1265 KB  
Article
Estimation of Overlapped Eye Fixation Related Potentials: The General Linear Model, a More Flexible Framework than the ADJAR Algorithm
by Emmanuelle Kristensen, Bertrand Rivet and Anne Guérin-Dugué
J. Eye Mov. Res. 2017, 10(1), 1-27; https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.1.7 - 10 Jul 2017
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 1015
Abstract
The Eye Fixation Related Potential (EFRP) estimation is the average of EEG signals across epochs at ocular fixation onset. Its main limitation is the overlapping issue. Inter Fixation Intervals (IFI) - typically around 300 ms in the case of unrestricted eye movement- depend [...] Read more.
The Eye Fixation Related Potential (EFRP) estimation is the average of EEG signals across epochs at ocular fixation onset. Its main limitation is the overlapping issue. Inter Fixation Intervals (IFI) - typically around 300 ms in the case of unrestricted eye movement- depend on participants’ oculomotor patterns, and can be shorter than the latency of the components of the evoked potential. If the duration of an epoch is longer than the IFI value, more than one fixation can occur, and some overlapping between adjacent neural responses ensues. The classical average does not take into account either the presence of several fixations during an epoch or overlapping. The Adjacent Response algorithm (ADJAR), which is popular for event-related potential estimation, was compared to the General Linear Model (GLM) on a real dataset from a conjoint EEG and eye-tracking experiment to address the overlapping issue. The results showed that the ADJAR algorithm was based on assumptions that were too restrictive for EFRP estimation. The General Linear Model appeared to be more robust and efficient. Different configurations of this model were compared to estimate the potential elicited at image onset, as well as EFRP at the beginning of exploration. These configurations took into account the overlap between the event-related potential at stimulus presentation and the following EFRP, and the distinction between the potential elicited by the first fixation onset and subsequent ones. The choice of the General Linear Model configuration was a tradeoff between assumptions about expected behavior and the quality of the EFRP estimation: the number of different potentials estimated by a given model must be controlled to avoid erroneous estimations with large variances. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop