Search Results (10)

This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of etrasimod. Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily selective modulator of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1PR), developed for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis and currently being explored for its potential in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. It selectively targets the S1PR subtypes S1PR₁, S1PR₄, and S1PR₅, with limited activity on S1PR₃ and no activity on S1PR₂. Clinical trials have demonstrated that etrasimod significantly reduces symptoms and induces endoscopic improvement in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis who are refractory or intolerant to at least one conventional therapy, biologic agent, or Janus kinase inhibitor, while maintaining a favourable safety profile. At the end of 2023, etrasimod was approved in the United States and Europe, and it is currently under review for ulcerative colitis in several other regions. Etrasimod offers a novel therapeutic option with unique characteristics that may help address the persistent unmet needs of real-world patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Full article

Sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are the latest drug class to have received approval for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and have brought a new mechanism of action to this landscape. They target immune cell trafficking, specifically the egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes to the bloodstream, and have proven to be an efficacious and safe anti-inflammatory mechanism. This narrative review aims to distil the key trial data on the efficacy and safety of ozanimod and etrasimod, the two S1PR modulators currently licensed for use in UC. We discuss the higher response rates in the advanced therapy naive versus exposed subgroups. We summarise their safety profiles, taking into consideration open label extension data. Finally, we consider where this class of drugs may be best placed in the treatment landscape and also provide a practical guide for their use in clinical practice. Full article

Pediatric gastroenterology is entering a pivotal phase marked by significant challenges and emerging opportunities in treating conditions like celiac disease (CeD), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) pose significant clinical hurdles, but new therapeutic avenues are emerging. Advances in precision medicine, particularly proteomics, are reshaping care by tailoring treatments to individual patient characteristics. For CeD, therapies like gluten-degrading enzymes (latiglutenase, Kuma030) and zonulin inhibitors (larazotide acetate) show promise, though clinical outcomes are inconsistent. Immunotherapy and microbiota modulation, including probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are also under exploration, with potential benefits in symptom management. Transglutaminase 2 inhibitors like ZED-1227 could help prevent gluten-induced damage. Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune pathways, such as AMG 714 and larazotide acetate, require further validation in pediatric populations. In EoE, biologics like dupilumab, cendakimab, dectrekumab (IL-13 inhibitors), and mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (IL-5/IL-5R inhibitors) show varying efficacy, while thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) inhibitors like tezepelumab are also being investigated. These therapies require more pediatric-specific research to optimize their use. For IBD, biologics like vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab, as well as small molecules like tofacitinib, etrasimod, and upadacitinib, are emerging treatments. New medications for individuals with refractory or steroid-dependent AIH have been explored. Personalized therapy, integrating precision medicine, therapeutic drug monitoring, and lifestyle changes, is increasingly guiding pediatric IBD management. This narrative review explores recent breakthroughs in treating CeD, EoE, IBD, and AIH, with a focus on pediatric studies when available, and discusses the growing role of proteomics in advancing personalized gastroenterological care. Full article

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management stands at the cusp of a transformative era, with recent breakthroughs heralding a paradigm shift in treatment strategies. Traditionally, IBD therapeutics revolved around immunosuppressants, but the landscape has evolved significantly. Recent approvals of etrasimod, upadacitinib, mirikizumab, and risankizumab have introduced novel mechanisms of action, offering renewed hope for IBD patients. These medications represent a departure from the status quo, breaking years of therapeutic stagnation. Precision medicine, involving Artificial Intelligence, is a pivotal aspect of this evolution, tailoring treatments based on genetic profiles, disease characteristics, and individual responses. This approach optimizes treatment efficacy, and paves the way for personalized care. Yet, the rising cost of IBD therapies, notably biologics, poses challenges, impacting healthcare budgets and patient access. Ongoing research strives to assess cost-effectiveness, guiding policy decisions to ensure equitable access to advanced treatments. Looking ahead, the future of IBD management holds great promise. Emerging therapies, precision medicine, and ongoing research into novel targets promise to reshape the IBD treatment landscape. As these advances continue to unfold, IBD patients can anticipate a brighter future, one marked by more effective, personalized, and accessible treatments. Full article

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease in which one-quarter of patients are at risk of developing a severe form of the disease known as acute severe UC (ASUC). This condition exposes patients to serious complications, including toxic megacolon, surgical intervention, and even death. The current therapeutic strategy relies on time-dependent, multi-step algorithms that integrate systemic corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and biologic agents (specifically infliximab) as medical therapy aimed at avoiding colectomy. Despite this approach, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to either corticosteroids or infliximab and may require alternative therapeutic options if there is no urgent surgical necessity. These alternatives include other biologics or emerging small molecules, although the evidence supporting these treatments remains extremely low, even considering their well-documented and promising efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe UC. Conversely, it is necessary to investigate whether infliximab can be effectively replaced or surpassed by other approved biological agents and small molecules as first-line therapy after steroid resistance. This review aims to summarise the available evidence on small molecules, specifically Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. Full article

Background/Objectives: Etrasimod is a newly FDA-approved Sphingosine-1-Phosphate modulator indicated for moderate and severe ulcerative colitis. It is extensively metabolized in the liver via the cytochrome P450 system and may accumulate markedly in patients with hepatic dysfunction, exposing them to toxicity. The aim of the current study is to utilize a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to evaluate the impact of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic behavior of etrasimod and to appropriately select dosage regimens for patients with chronic liver disease; Methods: PK-Sim was used to develop the etrasimod PBPK model, which was verified using clinical data from healthy subjects and subsequently adapted to reflect the physiological changes associated with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction; Results: Simulations indicated that hepatic clearance of etrasimod is clearly reduced in patients with Child–Pugh B and C liver impairment. Based on these findings, dosing adjustments were proposed to achieve therapeutic exposures equivalent to those in individuals with normal liver function. In the Child–Pugh B and C population groups, 75% and 62.5%, respectively, of the standard dose were enough to have comparable exposure to the healthy population. These adjusted dosages aim to mitigate the risk of drug toxicity while maintaining efficacy; Conclusions: The PBPK model provides a robust framework for individualizing drug therapy in patients with hepatic impairment, ensuring safer and more effective treatment outcomes. Further clinical studies are warranted to verify these dosing recommendations and to refine the model for broader clinical applications. Full article

The management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires weighing an individual patient’s therapeutic benefits and therapy-related complication risks. The immunomodulators that have been commonly used so far in IBD therapy are thiopurines, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine. As our understanding of the IBD pathomechanisms is widening, new therapeutic approaches are being introduced, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators’ development. Non-selective JAK inhibitors are represented by tofacitinib, while selective JAK inhibitors comprise filgotinib and upadacitinib. As for the S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for UC therapy. The number of elderly patients with IBD is growing; therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the oral immunomodulators among the subjects aged ≥60. Possible complications limit the use of thiopurines in senior patients. Likewise, the promising effectiveness of new drugs in IBD therapy in those with additional risk factors might be confined by the risk of serious adverse events. However, the data regarding this issue are limited. Full article

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. In the last decades, the therapeutic options available for the management of patients with moderate to severe UC have increased significantly, including not only biological drugs but also small molecules. However, there is a persistent need to develop new drugs that act on new targets while minimizing the risk of adverse events. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a membrane-derived lysophospholipid. The S1P gradient between tissues and the circulatory system has a key role in regulating the trafficking of immune cells as autoreactive B and T lymphocytes. S1P receptor modulators could be a safe and efficacious alternative mechanism for reducing inflammation in immune-mediated disorders, including UC, by reducing lymphocyte egress from the lymph nodes to the bloodstream. Several S1P receptor modulators have been developed and tested in UC. Ozanimod is already approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Agency (EMA), while etrasimod and VTX002 are still under approval. Oral administration route, rapidity and reliable safety profile are the main advantages of this class of drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence for the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ozanimod, etrasimod, and VTX002 in UC. Full article

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic and disabling conditions that, uncontrolled, lead to irreversible bowel damage and associated comorbidities. Despite the new era of biological therapies, IBDs remain not curative. The treatment purpose is to induce endoscopic remission, reduce the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life. Optimal and early treatment could enable the prevention of their complications. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the capacity of overcoming the limitations of biologic agents (i.e., parenteral administration, rapidity of action and primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Of special interest are results from the use of oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (ozanimod, etrasimod, fingolimod and laquinimod), based on S1P activities to target lymphocyte recirculation in the mucosa, acting as immunosuppressive agents. Most S1P modulators are reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of both UC and CD. High and satisfactory rates of clinical remission as well as endoscopic improvement and remission can be achieved with these molecules. Safety alarms remain rather low, although the S1P binding to two of its G protein-coupled receptors, 2 and 3 (S1PR2 and S1PR3), may be associated with cardiovascular risks. Cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define their place in therapy. This review summarizes these emerging data published by PubMed and EMBASE databases and from ongoing clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of selectivity of S1P modulators in the treatment of IBD. Full article

Incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is increasing, and late-stage diagnosis makes these cancers difficult to treat. Chronic and low-grade inflammation are recognized risks for most GI cancers. The GI mucosal immune system maintains healthy homeostasis and signalling molecules made from saturated fats, bioactive sphingolipids, play essential roles in healthy GI immunity. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive sphingolipid, is a key mediator in a balanced GI immune response. Disruption in the S1P pathway underlies systemic chronic metabolic inflammatory disorders, including diabetes and GI cancers, providing a strong rationale for using modulators of the S1P pathway to treat pathological inflammation. Here, we discuss the effects of bioactive sphingolipids in immune homeostasis with a focus on S1P in chronic low-grade inflammation associated with increased risk of GI carcinogenesis. Contemporary information on S1P signalling involvement in cancers of the digestive system, from top to bottom, is reviewed. Further, we discuss the use of novel S1P receptor modulators currently in clinical trials and their potential as first-line drugs in the clinic for chronic inflammatory diseases. Recently, ozanimod (Zeposia^TM) and etrasimod have been approved for clinical use to treat ulcerative colitis and eosinophilic oesophagitis, respectively, which may have longer term benefits in reducing risk of GI cancers. Full article