Search Results (9)

Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach “palliative revascularization.” This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. Methods: A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. Results: Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases. Full article

Background: Minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) has emerged as an alternative approach in the surgical management of coronary artery disease (CAD), offering potential advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. While conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard treatment for severe CAD, MICS has seen variable adoption due to concerns over procedural complexity, the risk of incomplete revascularization, and the increasing role of percutaneous interventional techniques. Objectives: This review examines recent clinical developments in MICS, analyzing its techniques, technological advancements, and the impact on patient outcomes, while also addressing its limitations. Methods: This narrative review incorporates studies from PubMed, tracing the evolution of coronary surgery, the refinement of minimally invasive approaches, and the innovations that have enabled the selective implementation of MICS. This review evaluates robot-assisted coronary surgery and totally endoscopic coronary revascularization, discussing their clinical indications and comparative outcomes. Results: Advances in imaging, surgical instrumentation, and anesthesia have improved procedural safety and precision, yet MICS remains a selectively utilized technique rather than a universally preferred alternative. Comparative studies demonstrate mixed clinical outcomes, highlighting both the recovery benefits and technical challenges associated with MICS. Discussion: Patient selection, preoperative planning, and individualized surgical strategies play a crucial role in optimizing the effectiveness of MICS. Challenges include technical complexity, integration into broader clinical practice, and the need for procedural refinement. While ongoing research continues to address these hurdles, the role of MICS in CAD management remains context-dependent, influenced by case complexity and institutional expertise. Conclusion: MICS presents an evolving surgical approach with defined benefits and limitations, requiring careful patient selection and procedural optimization for the best outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of recent advances in MICS while acknowledging its challenges and selective application in coronary surgery. Full article

Background: The non-robotic endoscopic harvest of the internal mammary artery (IMA) facilitates minimally invasive bypass grafting while minimizing chest wall trauma. The technique was pioneered in the early 1990s and has recently regained popularity due to its accessibility and reproducibility. This review aims to provide an overview of endoscopic IMA harvest from its inception to the present. Methods: In August 2024, a literature search was performed using the electronic databases of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) and PubMed. To obtain optimal search results, the keywords “thoracoscopic”, “endoscopic”, “minimally invasive”, “video-assisted”, “video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery VATS”, and “internal mammary artery” or “internal thoracic artery” were used, excluding the term “robotic”. References from the extracted articles were also reviewed to identify additional studies on endoscopic IMA harvest. Results: A total of 17 articles were included in the final analysis. Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvest times of between 17 and 164 min were reported, with an injury to LIMA rates between 0.7 and 2.2%. Conclusions: After a 15-year period without scientific publications, interest in the endoscopic-assisted approach has rekindled in recent years due to the reduction in chest trauma compared to direct vision harvest and the widespread availability of conventional endoscopic tools. This renewed focus underscores the potential to make minimally invasive coronary surgery available in all centers. Full article

The harvesting of conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery has evolved over the last decade to include endoscopic approaches to access the saphenous vein, radial artery, and internal mammary artery. These minimally invasive techniques reduce the morbidity associated with open procedures by decreasing pain and recovery time and increasing mobility post operatively. This review highlights the differences in morbidity, quality, and patency between the most common conduits that are harvested minimally invasively for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Full article

Background: The long saphenous vein is routinely used for coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and two primary techniques are commonly utilized: endoscopic vessel harvesting (EVH) and open vessel harvesting (OVH). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the EVH and OVH techniques used for CABG within the confines of a tertiary hospital. Methods: The clinical data of all patients subjected to either EVH or OVH for CABG surgery between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to discern variations in the rates of postoperative complications between EVH and OVH. Results: A cohort of 1884 individuals were included in this study, 75.3% of whom underwent EVH. Notably, the incidence of postoperative leg wound complications was significantly different between the patients who underwent OVH and the patients who underwent EVH, with incidence rates of 18.6% and 32%, respectively (p < 0.001). Leg wound complications (p < 0.001; OR 1.946; 95% CI 1.528–2.477) and leg wound infections (p = 0.050, OR 1.517, 95% CI 0.999–2.303) were significantly associated with OVH. Moreover, leg wound hematoma (p = 0.039, OR = 0.402, 95% CI = 0.169–0.957) and EVH were strongly associated. Conclusions: The large sample of patients and the inclusion of a range of Asian ethnic groups provided notable insights into postoperative complications related to different modalities. EVH was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative leg wound complications, which suggests that EVH is a better modality for those undergoing CABG surgery. Full article

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in robotic-assisted coronary artery revascularization in Europe. Two different types of surgery can be performed using a robotic platform: RA-MIDCAB, in which the mammary artery is harvested endoscopically with robotic assistance and off-pump bypass graft is achieved under direct vision through mini thoracotomy, and TE-CAB, completely robotically performed. We started the robotic cardiac surgery program for mitral valve disease in our hospital, Humanitas Gavazzeni (Bergamo, Italy), in 2019; and in 2021, we addressed our experience with RA-MIDCAB. After a learning curve period, we have developed our technique to optimize the benefits offered by the robotic platform, tailoring strategy to individual patients, based on preoperative radiological images. Full article

The devastating impact of a circumflex coronary artery (CX) injury during mitral valve (MV) surgery is well reported. Despite significant improvements in preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative diagnosis and perioperative treatment strategies of CX injury during MV surgery, recent reports re-emphasize the variability in presentation, the unpredictable mechanisms of injury and the conflicting evidence regarding perioperative management. The progressive transition from conventional sternotomy access to minimally invasive surgical and transcatheter (TC) interventions for MV disease are associated with significant learning curves and require additional single-shaft and robotic console suture manipulation skills with special attentiveness to the potential risk of CX injury. The introduction of hybrid theatres that facilitate single stage surgical and TC interventions also provides new intraoperative diagnostic and therapeutic options without transporting unstable patients for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) assessment. By utilizing a MeSH terms-based PubMed search, a total of 89 patients with CX injury that occurred during MV surgery was identified from 49 reports between 1967 and 2022. MV surgery was performed by conventional sternotomy (n = 76, 85.4%), endoscopic (n = 12, 13.4%) and robotic access (n = 1, 1.1%), with 35 injuries (39.3%) resulting in total CX occlusion. Rescue PCI was utilized in 40 patients (44.9%). This manuscript provides a systematic overview of all available historic and contemporary reports on CX injury during MV surgery, outlines recent refinements in CX injury mechanisms, describes current MV surgery associated CX injury prevention and diagnosis and treatment strategies and highlights important MV procedural aspects that may minimize the risk and consequences of CX injury. Full article

Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms—namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated. Full article

Our objective was to describe the long-term effects of endoscopic mitral valve (MV) repair on outcome in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). In patients with HFpEF, even mild AFMR has been associated with poor outcome. The study population consisted of consecutive patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%, H₂FPEF score ≥ 5) and AFMR, who underwent isolated, minimally invasive endoscopic MV repair (MVRepair group) (n = 131) or remained on standard of care (StanCare group) (n = 139). Patients with coronary artery disease or organic mitral regurgitation (MR) were excluded. Patients were matched using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Endpoints were all-cause mortality and a composite of all-cause mortality and HFpEF readmissions. The median follow-up was 5.03 years (interquartile range (IQR) 2.6–7.9 years). In the MVRepair group, the perioperative, 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality were 0, 1%, 1%, and 12%, respectively. Additionally, 13 (10%) patients were readmitted for worsening HFpEF, while 2 (1%) individuals underwent redo MV surgery for recurrent MR. MVRepair compared with StanCare showed 21–29% (Standard Error (SE) 6–8%) and 19–26% (SE 6–8%) absolute risk reduction of all-cause mortality and HFpEF readmissions, respectively (all p < 0.05). MVRepair emerged as the strongest independent predictor of all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.16, 95% (Confidence Interval (CI) 0.07–0.34, p < 0.001) and HFpEF readmissions (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09–0.51, p < 0.001). At 5-year follow-up, in the MVRepair group, a total of 88% were alive and 80% were alive without readmission for HFpEF. We can conclude that endoscopic MV repair is associated with low perioperative mortality as well as high long-term efficacy, and appears to improve clinical outcome in patients with AFMR and HFpEF. Full article