Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = direct rapid immunohistochemical test

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 1027 KiB  
Article
Use of a Direct, Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for Diagnosis of Rabies Virus in Bats
by Charles E. Rupprecht, Lolita I. Van Pelt, April D. Davis, Richard B. Chipman and David L. Bergman
Zoonotic Dis. 2022, 2(1), 1-8; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis2010001 - 6 Jan 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4740
Abstract
Rabies, a zoonotic encephalitis due to transmission of a lyssavirus, such as rabies virus (RABV), has the highest case fatality of any infectious disease. A global program for the elimination of human rabies caused by dogs is proposed for realization by 2030. Sensitive, [...] Read more.
Rabies, a zoonotic encephalitis due to transmission of a lyssavirus, such as rabies virus (RABV), has the highest case fatality of any infectious disease. A global program for the elimination of human rabies caused by dogs is proposed for realization by 2030. Sensitive, specific, and inexpensive diagnostic tests are necessary for enhanced surveillance to detect infection, inform public health and veterinary professionals during risk assessments of exposure, and support overall programmatic goals. Multiple laboratory techniques are used to confirm a suspect case of rabies. One method for the detection of lyssavirus antigens within the brain is the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT), using light microscopy, and suitable for use under field conditions. Besides dogs, other major RABV reservoirs reside among mammalian mesocarnivores and bats. To date, use of the dRIT has been applied primarily for the diagnosis of RABV in suspect mesocarnivores. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of the dRIT to the diagnosis of rabies in bats, compared to the gold-standard, the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT). Brains of 264 suspect bats, consisting of 21 species from Arizona and Texas, were used in the evaluation of the dRIT. The overall sensitivity of the dRIT was 100% (0.969–1.0, 95% CI) and the specificity was 94.6% (0.896–0.976, 95% CI), comparable to the DFAT. This preliminary study demonstrated the utility of the dRIT in the confirmation of RABV infection in bats. Future studies should include additional geographic, lyssavirus, and mammalian species representations for broader application during enhanced rabies surveillance, with incorporation of any potential adjustments to standard protocols, as needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Zoonotic Diseases 2021–2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 2102 KiB  
Erratum
Erratum: Rupprecht, C.E., et al. Additional Progress in the Development and Application of a Direct, Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for Rabies Diagnosis. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 59
by Charles E. Rupprecht, Zhiquan Xiang, Alexandre Servat, Richard Franka, Jordona Kirby and Hildegund C. J. Ertl
Vet. Sci. 2018, 5(3), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030068 - 20 Jul 2018
Viewed by 3600
Abstract
Due to an error during production, the order in which Figure 1 and Figure 2 appear and the linking of the Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions in the Results section of the published paper [1] were incorrect. A corrected version of the [...] Read more.
Due to an error during production, the order in which Figure 1 and Figure 2 appear and the linking of the Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions in the Results section of the published paper [1] were incorrect. A corrected version of the Figure order and associated captions is provided below[...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1506 KiB  
Technical Note
Additional Progress in the Development and Application of a Direct, Rapid Immunohistochemical Test for Rabies Diagnosis
by Charles E. Rupprecht, Zhiquan Xiang, Alexandre Servat, Richard Franka, Jordona Kirby and Hildegund C. J. Ertl
Vet. Sci. 2018, 5(2), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5020059 - 20 Jun 2018
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5881
Abstract
Laboratory-based surveillance is fundamental to effective rabies prevention and control. The direct fluorescent antibody (AB) test (FAT) is the gold standard for rabies diagnosis. Recently, additional tests besides the FAT have been developed, such as the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (DRIT). In this [...] Read more.
Laboratory-based surveillance is fundamental to effective rabies prevention and control. The direct fluorescent antibody (AB) test (FAT) is the gold standard for rabies diagnosis. Recently, additional tests besides the FAT have been developed, such as the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (DRIT). In this study, our objective was to further refine technical aspects of the DRIT using a combination of two monoclonal ABs (MABs), 502 and 802, conduct additional testing among rabies reference laboratories using a diversity of animal species and rabies virus (RV) variants and compare the potential utility of the DRIT for end users via proficiency testing (PT) against the FAT. Considering the ideal molar ratios of biotin to AB in formulation of the DRIT conjugate, 3.9 was found to be superior to 7.4, for detection of RV antigens in the brain of a naturally infected raccoon. Optimization of the DRIT conjugate may also be dependent upon the apparent choice of specific viral antigens for testing, as a gray fox RV variant reacted less strongly than a raccoon RV variant in determining the working dilution of the MAB cocktail. Using the same MABs and protocol, the DRIT was compared to the FAT using more than 800 samples of mammalian brains, representative of more than 25 taxa, including in excess of 250 animal rabies cases from Europe and North America. Sensitivity was determined at 98% (96–100%, 95% CI) and specificity was calculated at 95% (92–96%, 95% CI). In a comparison among end users, PT of laboratory personnel resulted in values of 77–100% sensitivity and 86-100% specificity. Based upon these and previously reported results, the DRIT appears to be a suitable alternative to the FAT for use in lyssavirus diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Canine Rabies Surveillance, Control and Elimination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1367 KiB  
Article
Epidemiology of Rabies in Lesotho: The Importance of Routine Surveillance and Virus Characterization
by Andre Coetzer, Jessica Coertse, Mabusetsa Joseph Makalo, Marosi Molomo, Wanda Markotter and Louis Hendrik Nel
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2017, 2(3), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030030 - 19 Jul 2017
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5012
Abstract
Rabies is widespread throughout Africa and Asia, despite the fact that the control and elimination of this disease has been proven to be feasible. Lesotho, a small landlocked country surrounded by South Africa, has been known to be endemic for rabies since the [...] Read more.
Rabies is widespread throughout Africa and Asia, despite the fact that the control and elimination of this disease has been proven to be feasible. Lesotho, a small landlocked country surrounded by South Africa, has been known to be endemic for rabies since the 1980s but the epidemiology of the disease remains poorly understood due to limited sample submission, constrained diagnostic capabilities, and a lack of molecular epidemiological data. Considering the existing challenges experienced in Lesotho, we aimed to evaluate the direct, rapid immunohistochemical test (DRIT) as an alternative to the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test for rabies diagnosis in Lesotho. Towards this aim, extensive training on the implementation and interpretation of the DRIT was hosted in Lesotho in April 2016 before both tests were applied to all samples subjected to routine rabies diagnosis at the Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL). We found agreement between the DFA and DRIT assays in 90/96 samples (93.75%). The samples that produced inconsistent results (n = 6) were re-tested a further two times with both assays before being subjected to a real-time qPCR to confirm the diagnosis. Additionally, a statistically significant three-fold increase in the average number of samples submitted per month was observed after the DRIT implementation started, following continuous rabies awareness initiatives amongst the animal health professionals in the country over a 12-month period (p = 0.0279). Partial G-L intergenic regions of selected rabies-positive samples (n = 21) were amplified, sequenced, and subjected to phylogenetic analyses. Molecular epidemiological analyses, that included viruses from neighbouring provinces in South Africa, suggested that at least three independent rabies cycles within Lesotho were implicated in instances of cross-border transmission. This study has evaluated alternative methods for diagnosing and improving rabies surveillance in Lesotho, as well as providing new information that would be of importance in the planning of future disease intervention campaigns, not only in Lesotho, but also in neighbouring South Africa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prophylaxis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

4 pages, 1502 KiB  
Article
Incorporating Direct Rapid Immunohistochemical Testing into Large-Scale Wildlife Rabies Surveillance
by Kevin Middel, Christine Fehlner-Gardiner, Natalie Pulham and Tore Buchanan
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2017, 2(3), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030021 - 30 Jun 2017
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4407
Abstract
Following an incursion of the mid-Atlantic raccoon variant of the rabies virus into southern Ontario, Canada, in late 2015, the direct rapid immunohistochemical test for rabies (dRIT) was employed on a large scale to establish the outbreak perimeter and to diagnose specific cases [...] Read more.
Following an incursion of the mid-Atlantic raccoon variant of the rabies virus into southern Ontario, Canada, in late 2015, the direct rapid immunohistochemical test for rabies (dRIT) was employed on a large scale to establish the outbreak perimeter and to diagnose specific cases to inform rabies control management actions. In a 17-month period, 5800 wildlife carcasses were tested using the dRIT, of which 307 were identified as rabid. When compared with the gold standard fluorescent antibody test (FAT), the dRIT was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.2%. Positive and negative test agreement was shown to be 98.3% and 99.1%, respectively, with an overall test agreement of 98.8%. The average cost to test a sample was $3.13 CAD for materials, and hands-on technical time to complete the test is estimated at 0.55 h. The dRIT procedure was found to be accurate, fast, inexpensive, easy to learn and perform, and an excellent tool for monitoring the progression of a wildlife rabies incursion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prophylaxis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop