Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = combustion flow field diagnosis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 7045 KB  
Article
Reconstruction Algorithm of Absorption Spectral Field Distribution Based on a Priori Constrained Bivariate Polynomial Model
by Chuge Chen, Dingfeng Shi, An Huang, Suman Ai, Rantong Niu, Ting Jiao and Zhenyu Xu
Photonics 2025, 12(4), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12040394 - 18 Apr 2025
Viewed by 745
Abstract
Computed Tomography–Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (CT-TDLAS) is an effective diagnostic method for analyzing combustion flow fields within engines. This study proposes an adaptive reconstruction algorithm utilizing constrained polynomial fitting within the CT-TDLAS framework. Based on existing polynomial fitting models, the proposed algorithm [...] Read more.
Computed Tomography–Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (CT-TDLAS) is an effective diagnostic method for analyzing combustion flow fields within engines. This study proposes an adaptive reconstruction algorithm utilizing constrained polynomial fitting within the CT-TDLAS framework. Based on existing polynomial fitting models, the proposed algorithm integrates physical boundary constraints on temperature and concentration fields, optimizing integrated absorbance errors. This method significantly enhances reconstruction accuracy and computational efficiency, while also lowering computational complexity. The adaptive strategy dynamically adjusts the polynomial order, effectively mitigating issues of overfitting or underdetermination typically associated with fixed polynomial orders. Numerical simulations demonstrate reduced temperature reconstruction errors of 2%, 1.6%, and 2% for single-peak, dual-peak, and mixed distribution flow fields, respectively. Corresponding concentration errors were 2%, 1.8%, and 2.6%, which are all improvements over those achieved by the Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (ART). Experimental results using a McKenna flat-flame burner revealed an average reconstruction error of only 0.3% compared to thermocouple measurements for high-temperature regions (>1000 K), with a minimal central temperature difference of 6 K. For lower-temperature peripheral regions, the average error was 188 K, illustrating the practical applicability of the proposed algorithm. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7406 KB  
Article
Error Analysis of Integrated Absorbance for TDLAS in a Nonuniform Flow Field
by Renjie Li, Fei Li, Xin Lin and Xilong Yu
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(22), 10936; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210936 - 19 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3220
Abstract
As an effective optical diagnosis method, tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) has increasingly moved to examine nonuniform flows, such as two-dimensional combustion diagnosis. To investigate the effect of nonuniformity along the line of sight in a measurement using TDLAS, the integrated absorbance (IA, [...] Read more.
As an effective optical diagnosis method, tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) has increasingly moved to examine nonuniform flows, such as two-dimensional combustion diagnosis. To investigate the effect of nonuniformity along the line of sight in a measurement using TDLAS, the integrated absorbance (IA, the key intermediate quantity in TDLAS) error was quantified. The error distribution is obtained from the line-shape parameters through the comprehensive analysis of the line-shape function and the fitting method. The effects of the fitting function and the absorption line overlap are also considered. A general method for estimating the error is given. The work illustrates the applicability of TDLAS technology in nonuniform flow fields and provides input parameters for the evaluation of tunable diode laser absorption tomography error. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop