Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 4894 KiB  
Review
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels
by Chae-Gwan Kong and Jong-Beom Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062038 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1035
Abstract
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or [...] Read more.
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or facet joint degeneration, necessitating revision surgery. Reoperation strategies depend on the failure mechanism, instability, sagittal malalignment, and neural compression. Anterior revision is suited for prosthesis failure, recurrent disc herniation, or ASD, enabling prosthesis removal, decompression, and fusion. In select cases, reimplantation may restore motion. Posterior approaches are preferred for facet degeneration, multilevel stenosis, or posterior hypertrophy, with options including foraminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Complex cases may require combined anterior and posterior surgery for optimal decompression and stability. This narrative review outlines revision strategies, emphasizing biomechanical assessment, radiographic evaluation, and patient-specific considerations. Despite surgical challenges, meticulous planning and execution can optimize outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 6076 KiB  
Case Report
C5 Palsy after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Two Case Reports and Literature Review
by César Carballo Cuello, Gabriel Flores Milan, Nicolas Baerga, Mark Greenberg, Puya Alikhani and Erik Hayman
Surgeries 2024, 5(3), 719-725; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030056 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1910
Abstract
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), also known as cervical artificial disc replacement, has become an alternative for the treatment of cervical spondylosis with radicular or myelopathic symptoms. However, there is limited literature regarding its complications and outcomes. We present two cases that developed C5 [...] Read more.
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), also known as cervical artificial disc replacement, has become an alternative for the treatment of cervical spondylosis with radicular or myelopathic symptoms. However, there is limited literature regarding its complications and outcomes. We present two cases that developed C5 nerve palsy (C5P) following two-level CDA. Both patients presented with C5P in a delayed fashion with 2/5 and 1/5 deltoid weakness on MMT, respectively. Postoperative imaging did not demonstrate any spinal cord compression and symptoms resolved (5/5 on MMT) with conservative management in both cases. To our knowledge, these represent the first cases of delayed C5P after cervical arthroplasty reported in the literature. We performed a literature review to further enhance our knowledge regarding CDA. By understanding its pathophysiology and response to treatment, these cases can serve as a guide for spine surgeons and improve their future outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1951 KiB  
Systematic Review
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Chiu-Ming Chen, Jui-Jung Yang and Chia-Chun Wu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3203; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113203 - 29 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2772
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are both considered to be efficacious surgical procedures for treating cervical spondylosis in patients with or without compression myelopathy. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes [...] Read more.
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are both considered to be efficacious surgical procedures for treating cervical spondylosis in patients with or without compression myelopathy. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at two contiguous levels. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to 1 May 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes between CDA and ACDF in patients with two-level cervical DDD were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were surgical success rates and secondary surgery rates. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, as well as the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the severity of cervical compression myelopathy and complication rates. Results: In total, eight studies (two RCTs, four retrospective studies, and two prospective studies) with a total of 1155 patients (CDA: 598; ACDF: 557) were included. Pooled results revealed that CDA was associated with a significantly higher overall success rate (OR, 2.710, 95% CI: 1.949–3.770) and lower secondary surgery rate (OR, 0.254, 95% CI: 0.169–0.382) compared to ACDF. In addition, complication rates were significantly lower in the CDA group than in the ACDF group (OR, 0.548, 95% CI: 0.326 to 0.919). CDA was also associated with significantly greater improvements in neck pain VAS than ACDF. No significant differences were found in improvements in the arm VAS, NDI, and JOA scores between the two procedures. Conclusions: CDA may provide better postoperative outcomes for surgical success, secondary surgery, pain reduction, and postoperative complications than ACDF for treating patients with two-level cervical DDD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1888 KiB  
Article
Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the Baguera®C Prosthesis
by Ming-Cheng Tsai, Ya-Fang Liu, Wei-Hsing Lin and Ming-Chung Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072048 - 2 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2379
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty [...] Read more.
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an accepted alternative that preserves the structure and flexibility of the cervical spine. This study aimed to explore the dynamic changes in the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine after CDA using a viscoelastic artificial disc, as well as the factors affecting mobility restoration. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 132 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and CDA from January 2015 to June 2022. Result: Analysis of data from 132 patients revealed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. The mean ROM of C2–C7 and functional spinal unit (FSU) segments significantly increased from 2 to 36 months post-operatively. Cervical spine flexibility was preserved and enhanced after prosthesis implantation. However, it took six months for the cervical spine motility to stabilize. In addition, sex and age were found to impact motility restoration, with female and younger patients exhibiting larger ROMs post-surgery. Additionally, CDA at the C5–C6 level resulted in the greatest increase in ROM, potentially improving overall kinematic ability. Conclusions: Single-segment artificial disc arthroplasty effectively restores the ROM in degenerative cervical spine conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1415 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Subsidence with Bryan Disc—A Retrospective Observational Analysis
by Cheng-Ying Lee, Kuan-Kai Tung, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Wen-Hsien Chen, Chung-Yuh Tzeng, Ruei-Hong Lin, Tse-Yu Chen, Chih-Wei Huang and Ting-Hsien Kao
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061589 - 10 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2479
Abstract
Background: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is currently used instead of fusion to preserve cervical spine motion. Cervical implant subsidence is a potential complication after CDA. Methods: Radiological measurements were recorded via patient anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in the neutral position. Subsidence [...] Read more.
Background: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is currently used instead of fusion to preserve cervical spine motion. Cervical implant subsidence is a potential complication after CDA. Methods: Radiological measurements were recorded via patient anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in the neutral position. Subsidence was defined as a decrease of 3 mm or more in functional spinal unit height (FSUH) from which was measured on a post-operative (OP) radiograph. Results: This study included 104 patients who underwent 153 CDA levels with the Bryan Disc. Approximately one-quarter of the implants (22.9%) showed subsidence. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that pre-OP mean disc height (DH) was identified as an independent risk factor for subsidence in multivariate analysis (0.151, 95% Confidence Interval 0–0.073, p = 0.018). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve = 0.852, sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 77.1%) revealed a cut-off value of 4.48 mm for pre-OP Mean-DH in the risk for implant subsidence. Conclusions: In this study, the subsidence rate significantly increased when the implants were oversized beyond a pre-OP Mean-DH of approximately >4 mm. Moreover, the implant subsidence incidence was higher than that reported in previous studies. This is possibly due to endplate over-preparation or disc space over-distraction during placement at the same height as the Bryan Disc (8.5 mm). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 416 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Kinematics and Biomechanics for Non-Contiguous Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, and Hybrid Cervical Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Albert T. Anastasio, Anthony N. Baumann, Andrew Fiorentino, Katelyn Sidloski, Kempland C. Walley, Aditya Muralidharan, Keegan T. Conry and Jacob C. Hoffmann
Biomechanics 2023, 3(4), 443-456; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3040036 - 1 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1950
Abstract
Cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD) is a common spinal pathology that is often treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and/or hybrid cervical surgery (HCS). The purpose of this first-time systematic review is to examine the biomechanical outcomes [...] Read more.
Cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD) is a common spinal pathology that is often treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and/or hybrid cervical surgery (HCS). The purpose of this first-time systematic review is to examine the biomechanical outcomes associated with three types of non-contiguous cervical surgeries—ACDF, CDA, and HCS—to provide a greater understanding of non-contiguous cervical surgical biomechanics. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until June 6th, 2023. The inclusion criteria was any article that reported biomechanical or kinematic outcomes, outcomes for any of the three non-contiguous cervical surgeries, and human-derived and/or human cadaver subjects. A total of 5 biomechanical articles were included from a total of 523 articles. Non-contiguous two-level HCS experienced less drastic range-of-motion (ROM) changes throughout the cervical spine and decreased intervertebral disc pressure (IDP) compared to non-contiguous two-level ACDF. Non-contiguous two-level CDA resulted in more cervical ROM and less non-operative segment facet contact force compared to non-contiguous two level ACDF. There was less cephalad and caudal non-operative segment ROM in non-contiguous two-level ACDF compared to contiguous three-level ACDF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Injury Biomechanics and Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1533 KiB  
Communication
Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
by Peter Obid, Anastasia Rakow, Gernot Michael Lang, Wolfgang Marx, Thomas Niemeyer and Tamim Rahim
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(4), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040592 - 28 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2350
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using the CP ESP® disc prosthesis. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data of 56 patients with [...] Read more.
Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using the CP ESP® disc prosthesis. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data of 56 patients with CSM have been analyzed. The mean age at surgery was 35.6 years (range: 25–43 years). The mean follow-up was 28.2 months (range: 13–42 months). The range of motion (ROM) of the index segments, as well as upper and lower adjacent segments, was measured before surgery and at final follow-up. The C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1s-CL) were analyzed as well. Pain intensity was measured preoperatively and during follow-up using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was assessed preoperatively and during follow-up for the clinical assessment of myelopathy. Surgical and implant-associated complications were analyzed as well. Results: The NRS pain score improved from a mean of 7.4 (±1.1) preoperatively to a mean of 1.5 (±0.7) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). The mJOA score improved from a mean of 13.1 (±2.8) preoperatively to a mean of 14.8 (±2.3) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean ROM of the index levels increased from 5.2° (±3.0) preoperatively to 7.3° (±3.2) at last follow-up (p < 0.05). Four patients developed heterotopic ossifications during follow-up. One patient developed permanent dysphonia. Conclusions: CDA showed good clinical and radiological outcome in this cohort of young patients. The motion of index segments could be preserved. CDA may be a viable treatment option in selected patients with CSM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Musculoskeletal (Orthopedic) Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop