Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = cerebellum teratoma

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 1202 KiB  
Case Report
Mature Teratoma of the Cerebellum with Formed Extracranial Component
by Agnieszka Nowacka, Ewa Ziółkowska, Wojciech Smuczyński, Dominika Bożiłow and Maciej Śniegocki
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1994; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061994 - 15 Mar 2025
Viewed by 852
Abstract
Background: Intracranial teratomas are very rare in adults, representing only 0.3–0.5% of all primary brain tumors. They originate from all three germ layers, and are classified as mature, immature, or malignant. Mature teratomas constitute the most prevalent type in the adult population, commonly [...] Read more.
Background: Intracranial teratomas are very rare in adults, representing only 0.3–0.5% of all primary brain tumors. They originate from all three germ layers, and are classified as mature, immature, or malignant. Mature teratomas constitute the most prevalent type in the adult population, commonly originating from midline structures such as the pineal and suprasellar regions. However, the localization of these tumors within the cerebellum is exceedingly rare, with only a limited number of cases reported globally. In this manuscript, we describe, to the best of our knowledge, the first documented case of a young adult patient presenting with a mature teratoma situated between the cerebellar hemispheres. Notably, this tumor was accompanied by occipital bone loss, through which a tumor pedicle extended, forming an extracranial component. Methods: After analyzing the clinical picture and additional examinations, the patient was classified for surgery. The intracranial part of the tumor contained numerous cysts with yellow fluid, a tooth, and fat tissue. The tumor was removed radically, with its extracranial part. Results: On the fourth day after surgery, the patient was discharged from the clinic in a good general condition, walking, with marked cerebellar symptoms. In a follow-up at 6 months postoperatively, the neurological examination was normal, with no headaches. MRI at the 6 months follow-up did not show any residual or recurrent tumor. Conclusions: Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of mature teratoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1336 KiB  
Article
Clinical Manifestation, Auxiliary Examination Features, and Prognosis of GFAP Autoimmunity: A Chinese Cohort Study
by Lei Liu, Boyan Fang, Zhixin Qiao, Xiaomeng Di, Qiuying Ma, Jingxiao Zhang and Jiawei Wang
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(12), 1662; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121662 - 3 Dec 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3647
Abstract
Objective: This paper reports the clinical manifestation and auxiliary examination features of 15 Chinese patients with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) autoimmunity. Methods: From June 2016 to December 2019, patients suspected to have neurological autoimmune disease after having their serum and cerebrospinal fluid [...] Read more.
Objective: This paper reports the clinical manifestation and auxiliary examination features of 15 Chinese patients with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) autoimmunity. Methods: From June 2016 to December 2019, patients suspected to have neurological autoimmune disease after having their serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tested for conventional neural antibodies were scanned for additional autoantibodies by immunohistochemistry. Samples that showed a characteristic immunoreactive pattern reminiscent of the GFAP of astrocytes were selected and confirmed by cell-based assay using cells-expressing human GFAPα. Results: A total of 15 patients (eight male and seven female) with a median age at onset of 53 years (range 28–72) were identified as GFAP-IgG-positive. Fourteen cases had GFAP-IgG detected in the CSF, while serum GFAP-IgG was detected in 11 cases. Eleven of the fifteen patients (73.3%) presented with an acute monophasic course, of which 10 (90.9%) had antecedent flu-like symptoms. The predominant phenotype was meningoencephalitis (46.7%), followed by meningoencephalomyelitis in 40% of the cases. The most common clinical features included long tract signs, brainstem symptoms, tremors, headaches, and psychiatric symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the enhancement of the meninges, the surface of the brainstem, the cerebellum, and the spinal cord as predominant. Inflammatory CSF showed mild lymphocyte-predominant pleocytosis with a median of 51/μL and elevated protein with a median of 87.5 mg/dL. Five patients had coexisting antibodies, including NMDAR-IgG in three patients and Yo and MOG-IgG in one patient each. One patient underwent a stereotactic brain biopsy, and the neuropathology diagnosis was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. One patient had ovarian teratoma. Eleven of the fifteen (73.3%) patients received both intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids. Among them, three patients also received immunosuppressive agents later. During a two-year follow-up, 9 of the 15 (60%) patients achieved complete clinical remission. Conclusions: The clinical presentation of GFAP astrocytopathy is heterogeneous. It can be characterized by an acute monophasic course and a chronic relapsing course. Tremors are a prominent clinical manifestation in patients with an acute monophasic course with GFAP-IgG antibodies only. Most patients responded well to immunotherapy. In patients with GFAP autoimmunity, presenting with a chronic relapsing course, one should actively search for immunogenic factors and the culprit antibodies. In the case of primary central nervous system lymphoma, GFAP autoimmunity does not always equate to autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroinflammation in Neurological Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop