Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ceramic powder waste (CPW)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 3066 KiB  
Review
Assessment of the Suitability of Ceramic Waste in Geopolymer Composites: An Appraisal
by Ismail Luhar, Salmabanu Luhar, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Marcin Nabiałek, Andrei Victor Sandu, Janusz Szmidla, Anna Jurczyńska, Rafiza Abdul Razak, Ikmal Hakem A Aziz, Noorina Hidayu Jamil and Laila Mardiah Deraman
Materials 2021, 14(12), 3279; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123279 - 14 Jun 2021
Cited by 43 | Viewed by 5010
Abstract
Currently, novel inorganic alumino-silicate materials, known as geopolymer composites, have emerged swiftly as an ecobenevolent alternative to contemporary ordinary Portland cement (OPC) building materials since they display superior physical and chemical attributes with a diverse range of possible potential applications. The said innovative [...] Read more.
Currently, novel inorganic alumino-silicate materials, known as geopolymer composites, have emerged swiftly as an ecobenevolent alternative to contemporary ordinary Portland cement (OPC) building materials since they display superior physical and chemical attributes with a diverse range of possible potential applications. The said innovative geopolymer technology necessitates less energy and low carbon footprints as compared to OPC-based materials because of the incorporation of wastes and/or industrial byproducts as binders replacing OPC. The key constituents of ceramic are silica and alumina and, hence, have the potential to be employed as an aggregate to manufacture ceramic geopolymer concrete. The present manuscript presents a review of the performance of geopolymer composites incorporated with ceramic waste, concerning workability, strength, durability, and elevated resistance evaluation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop