Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = caring and killing paradox

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
36 pages, 2882 KB  
Review
Mitochondrial Quality Control: Role in Cardiac Models of Lethal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
by Andrew R. Kulek, Anthony Anzell, Joseph M. Wider, Thomas H. Sanderson and Karin Przyklenk
Cells 2020, 9(1), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010214 - 15 Jan 2020
Cited by 71 | Viewed by 8191
Abstract
The current standard of care for acute myocardial infarction or ‘heart attack’ is timely restoration of blood flow to the ischemic region of the heart. While reperfusion is essential for the salvage of ischemic myocardium, re-introduction of blood flow paradoxically kills (rather than [...] Read more.
The current standard of care for acute myocardial infarction or ‘heart attack’ is timely restoration of blood flow to the ischemic region of the heart. While reperfusion is essential for the salvage of ischemic myocardium, re-introduction of blood flow paradoxically kills (rather than rescues) a population of previously ischemic cardiomyocytes—a phenomenon referred to as ‘lethal myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury’. There is long-standing and exhaustive evidence that mitochondria are at the nexus of lethal IR injury. However, during the past decade, the paradigm of mitochondria as mediators of IR-induced cardiomyocyte death has been expanded to include the highly orchestrated process of mitochondrial quality control. Our aims in this review are to: (1) briefly summarize the current understanding of the pathogenesis of IR injury, and (2) incorporating landmark data from a broad spectrum of models (including immortalized cells, primary cardiomyocytes and intact hearts), provide a critical discussion of the emerging concept that mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy (the components of mitochondrial quality control) may contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiomyocyte death in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mitochondria)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2339 KB  
Review
Euthanasia of Cattle: Practical Considerations and Application
by Jan Keith Shearer
Animals 2018, 8(4), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040057 - 17 Apr 2018
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 15866
Abstract
Acceptable methods for the euthanasia of cattle include overdose of an anesthetic, gunshot and captive bolt. The use of anesthetics for euthanasia is costly and complicates carcass disposal. These issues can be avoided by use of a physical method such as gunshot or [...] Read more.
Acceptable methods for the euthanasia of cattle include overdose of an anesthetic, gunshot and captive bolt. The use of anesthetics for euthanasia is costly and complicates carcass disposal. These issues can be avoided by use of a physical method such as gunshot or captive bolt; however, each requires that certain conditions be met to assure an immediate loss of consciousness and death. For example, the caliber of firearm and type of bullet are important considerations when gunshot is used. When captive bolt is used, a penetrating captive bolt loaded with the appropriate powder charge and accompanied by a follow up (adjunctive) step to assure death are required. The success of physical methods also requires careful selection of the anatomic site for entry of a “free bullet” or “bolt” in the case of penetrating captive bolt. Disease eradication plans for animal health emergencies necessitate methods of euthanasia that will facilitate rapid and efficient depopulation of animals while preserving their welfare to the greatest extent possible. A portable pneumatic captive bolt device has been developed and validated as effective for use in mass depopulation scenarios. Finally, while most tend to focus on the technical aspects of euthanasia, it is extremely important that no one forget the human cost for those who may be required to perform the task of euthanasia on a regular basis. Symptoms including depression, grief, sleeplessness and destructive behaviors including alcoholism and drug abuse are not uncommon for those who participate in the euthanasia of animals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Humane Killing and Euthanasia of Animals on Farms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop