Search Results (92)

Background: Bulgaria carries a high burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) but, at the start of this study, lacked a nationwide organized screening program. Understanding specialist views (particularly on mail-based fecal testing) is essential for effective policy development. Objective: The objective is to assess the attitudes towards, practices of, and perceived barriers to CRC screening among Bulgarian gastroenterologists, with a focus on the feasibility of mail-based fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 38 gastroenterologists examined clinical use of FOBT, screening method preferences, and perceived systemic and patient-level barriers to CRC screening. Results: Among respondents, 57.89% reported using FOBT in clinical practice, and 71.05% indicated they would undergo the test themselves and recommend it to relatives. Colonoscopy was the preferred diagnostic tool for 84.21% of participants; however, the existing literature raises concerns about its feasibility for large-scale population screening. Key systemic barriers, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, included financial constraints (mean = 3.08), inadequate infrastructure (2.89), and healthcare workforce shortages (2.71). Patient-level barriers were led by low health literacy (4.13), lack of motivation (3.95), and procedural fears (3.26). A majority (84.38%) believed that mail-based FOBT would increase screening uptake, and 57.89% supported annual distribution of test kits. Nearly all respondents (97.37%) favored initiating screening at age 50. Conclusions: This study highlights strong support among Bulgarian gastroenterologists for a national CRC screening program, with particular endorsement of mail-based FOBT. Despite acknowledged systemic and population-level barriers, the findings suggest that such an approach could increase screening coverage, promote early detection, and support the strategic rollout of Bulgaria’s emerging cancer control initiatives. Full article

Background/Objectives: Weight gain is frequently observed during and following breast cancer therapy. Women with overweight/obesity have poorer breast cancer prognoses and are more likely to develop comorbidities. The present study describes the development and qualitative assessment of the acceptability of the NutriLife study, a lifestyle weight management intervention with dietetic counseling and digital tools for breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: The intervention was developed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, informed by a systematic literature review and stakeholder input. Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). A total of 22 BCSs with overweight/obesity participated in focus groups, and 5 dietitians/nutritionists specializing in breast cancer in Greece participated in semi-structured interviews. The data were further analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Stakeholders assessed the intervention as acceptable across all TFA constructs. The intervention was characterized as supportive, easily adaptable, time-efficient, well-organized, beneficial, and professionally driven, with potential barriers including limited personal time, inadequate digital literacy, insufficient self-care, and lack of commitment. Gradually increasing goals may be helpful and less stressful, while educational resources enhance focus on these objectives, thus encouraging intervention participation. Ensuring confidentiality was perceived as central to promoting health. Conclusions: The evidence-based, co-participatory design of the NutriLife intervention was perceived as acceptable by the participating stakeholders and will be pilot-tested in a randomized controlled trial. Full article

In recent years, functional foods have garnered increasing scientific and public health interest due to their potential to confer physiological benefits beyond basic nutritional value. International bodies such as EFSA, FDA, and WHO define functional foods as those containing bioactive components that may contribute to the prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. The evolving paradigm of “food as medicine” reflects a broader shift in nutritional science towards proactive, health-oriented dietary strategies. This article provides a comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of functional foods by examining their biological mechanisms, clinical evidence, public health significance, regulatory frameworks, and future prospects—particularly in the context of advances in personalized nutrition and nutrigenomics. A thorough literature review was conducted, drawing from recent peer-reviewed studies and guidelines from key health authorities. The review highlights the roles of specific compounds such as probiotics and prebiotics in modulating the gut microbiome, flavonoids and polyphenols in anti-inflammatory processes, omega-3 fatty acids in cardiometabolic regulation, and vitamins and minerals in supporting immune function. While an expanding body of clinical trials and meta-analyses supports the health benefits of these compounds—including reductions in LDL cholesterol, improved insulin sensitivity, and mitigation of oxidative stress—the integration of functional foods into everyday diets remains challenging. Socioeconomic disparities and limited health literacy often impede their accessibility and widespread adoption in public health practice. Functional foods represent a promising component of prevention-focused modern healthcare. To maximize their impact, a coordinated, evidence-based approach is essential, involving collaboration among healthcare professionals, nutrition scientists, policymakers, and the food industry. Looking forward, innovations in artificial intelligence, microbiome research, and genomic technologies may unlock novel opportunities for the targeted and effective application of functional foods in population health. Full article

Healthcare disparities in cancer care remain pervasive, driven by intersecting socioeconomic, racial, and insurance-related inequities. These disparities manifest in various forms such as limited access to medical resources, underrepresentation in clinical trials, and worse cancer outcomes for marginalized groups, including low-income individuals, racial minorities, and those with inadequate insurance coverage, who face significant barriers in accessing comprehensive cancer care. This manuscript explores the multifaceted nature of these disparities, examining the roles of socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and insurance status in influencing cancer care access and outcomes. Historical and contemporary data highlight that minority racial status correlates with reduced clinical trial participation and increased cancer-related mortality. Barriers such as insurance coverage, health literacy, and language further hinder access to cancer treatments. Addressing these disparities requires a systemic approach that includes regulatory reforms, policy changes, educational initiatives, and innovative trial and treatment designs. This manuscript emphasizes the need for comprehensive interventions targeting biomedicine, socio-demographics, and social characteristics to mitigate these inequities. By understanding the underlying causes and implementing targeted strategies, we can work towards a more equitable healthcare system. This involves improving access to high-quality care, increasing participation in research, and addressing social determinants of health. This manuscript concludes with policy recommendations and future directions to achieve health equity in cancer care, ensuring optimal outcomes for all patients. Full article

Objectives: The Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is a cornerstone of cancer prevention, yet uptake remains suboptimal in many countries. This study analyzed the factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among adults, including a focused analysis of parental behaviors. Methods: Data were collected through a web-based survey using a questionnaire. We performed univariable analysis and three logistic regression analyses to investigate the determinants in the overall sample and among parents. Results: A total of 1821 participants were surveyed. HPV vaccination uptake was low, with only 6.9% of the total sample and 7.6% of young adults (18–35 yo) vaccinated. Among parents, 47.9% had vaccinated children aged 12–17, and 21.1% those aged 18 and over. Higher health literacy was associated with positive attitudes (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.48–2.79), while receiving information from pediatricians or gynecologists was linked to children’s vaccination status (OR 7.30, 95% CI 2.29–23.31) and parents’ intentions for future HPV vaccination (OR 5.86, 95% CI 1.85–18.50). Adequate knowledge emerged as a strong predictor of positive attitudes (OR 6.50, 95% CI 4.91–8.61) and parents’ intentions (OR 4.89, 95% CI 2.21–10.84). Vaccination status was a key factor influencing parental decisions and overall vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical role of health professionals and the need for targeted communication to address persistent knowledge gaps and promote HPV vaccine confidence within general population. Full article

Background: The United States (US) continues to face a substantial burden of cervical cancer, which has been the focus of many policies and public health prevention agendas. Of the numerous risk factors associated with cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection remains the leading and most preventable cause of this chronic disease. Therefore, one major public health prevention strategy to decrease cervical cancer cases is HPV vaccination. Another screening tool that enables cervical cancer prevention and early intervention is the Pap smear, the primary method of screening for abnormal cervical cells. However, barriers such as social determinants of health and ineffective patient–provider communication hinder access to such critical preventive measures. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the knowledge level of US female adults, aged 21–65 years, concerning HPV infection and cervical cancer prevention using the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) database. Additionally, it assessed associations between patient–provider communication and the completion of Pap smear tests. Methods: Descriptive statistics were computed to explore the sociodemographic characteristics of female survey participants as well as to gather frequency and percentages of responses related to knowledge of HPV, awareness of the HPV vaccine, and history of Pap smear. Chi-squared tests were carried out to examine the associations between awareness of a cervical cancer vaccine or HPV shot and whether the participant has had a Pap smear, heard of the HPV vaccine, and knowledge of HPV’s association with cervical cancer. Next, binary logistic regression models were built to determine the size and direction of the association between patient–provider communication metrics and measures of (1) having had a Pap smear, (2) participant knowledge of HPV, (3) participant awareness of causality between HPV and cervical cancer, and (4) participant knowledge of HPV vaccine and cervical cancer prevention measures. Results: A substantial majority of participants (81.8%) reported having heard of HPV. Among them, 72.1% recognized that HPV could cause cervical cancer. Awareness of the HPV vaccine was reported by 88.1%, suggesting a relatively high reach of effective public health messaging. Regarding Pap tests, 43.3% of participants had undergone testing within the past year, but 12.6% had not been tested in over five years, and 3.6% have never been tested. Bivariate analysis using chi-squared tests revealed significant associations between participants’ history of Pap smears and their knowledge of HPV infection, its role in cervical cancer, and HPV vaccination as a prevention tool. Participants who had undergone a Pap test were more likely to have heard of HPV (p < 0.001), were knowledgeable of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001), and were more aware of the HPV vaccine (p < 0.001). Participants reporting “never” for certain communication criteria significantly had an increased risk of having lower knowledge levels about the HPV vaccine and other cervical cancer prevention measures. They also had almost twice the risk of having lower knowledge levels about HPV prevention measures when reporting “never” (RR = 1.997, 95% CI (1.018–3.916) for “spending enough time with patients” compared to those selecting “always”. Additionally, participants responding “sometimes” (RR = 1.889, 95% CI (1.187–3.005) rather than “always” to feeling involved in healthcare decisions had a significantly higher risk of being unaware of the vaccine or other cervical cancer prevention measures. Conclusions: Strengthening provider communication and education skills not only encourages greater patient knowledge and adherence to preventative measures, such as HPV and cervical cancer screening, but also reduces disparities in healthcare stemming from limited health literacy. Full article

Background: Patient-centered communication is a critical process in high-quality healthcare that emphasizes the reciprocal sharing of information between providers and patients to ensure care aligns with the patient’s needs, preferences, and personal values. A significant challenge arises from the healthcare provider’s time constraints during clinical encounters and the lack of adequate training on how to adopt a patient-centered communication style that addresses patient concerns, making it difficult to foster an environment conducive to shared decision making. These issues are further exacerbated by cultural and language barriers, along with low levels of health literacy and social determinants of health (SDoHs), which complicate efforts to deliver patient-centered care. Objective: This study examined quality criteria for patient–provider communication (PPC) and their associations with sociodemographic characteristics and SDoHs on housing, transportation, and food insecurity. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-6) national dataset. Associations between PPC and sociodemographic variables were tested using the chi-squared test. Binary logistic regression was carried out to examine the association between three PPC criteria and each of the sociodemographic characteristics and patient comfort in disclosing information on SDoHs. Results: Bivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations for age, occupation status, marital status, Hispanic origin, and race across all three PPC criteria. Significant associations were reported for education and income for the two criteria related to being given the chance to ask questions and being involved in healthcare decisions. Finally, significant associations were reported for all PPC criteria and patient comfort levels in discussing SDoHs. Conclusions: Findings from this paper provide insight for enhancing the quality of PCC in underserved populations, particularly when it comes to informing the design of evidence-based cervical cancer screening interventions which are culturally centered around the patients’ needs and that integrate PPC as a foundational component. Full article

Background and Objectives: Romania has the highest rate of cervical cancer in Europe. The aim of this study is to measure the level of sexual health knowledge among participants and determine the extent to which factors such as age, gender, education level, access to sexual health resources, and cultural background influence their knowledge. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1089 Romanian youth participants aged 18–35 years. A self-administered online questionnaire was used concerning the level of knowledge relating to STIs, contraception methods, and preventive attitudes during the 2023–2024 academic year. Results: Most of the participants (93,8%) scored a “good-to-excellent” STI level of knowledge. Despite this, 71.9% of the responders had never taken an HIV test, and 63.5% had never been tested for other STIs. Logistic regression analysis revealed a direct association between higher STI knowledge levels among respondents with age (p < 0.001), underage sexual debuts (p = 0.018), greater parental education (p = 0.016), and those who studied health sciences (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights the critical need for health communication campaigns to enhance STI knowledge and vaccine literacy to improve the vaccination rates among young people in Romania. The identified knowledge gaps, frequent misconceptions, and barriers to STI testing underscore the importance of comprehensive sexual health education, public health initiatives for reducing the stigma associated with STIs, and improved access to healthcare services for young people. Full article

Background and Objectives: Healthy lifestyle behaviors and cancer screening are crucial for cancer prevention; however, their relationship remains inadequately explored. This study examines cancer-related lifestyle behaviors, attitudes toward cancer screening, and their interrelationship in adults. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 1129 adults (aged 18–70) visiting family health centers in Kayseri, Türkiye. Data was collected via face-to-face surveys assessing sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors (Lifestyle Questionnaire Related to Cancer), and screening attitudes (Attitude Scale Toward Cancer Screenings). Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests. Results: Women, married participants, urban residents, and those with higher education and income exhibited healthier lifestyle behaviors and more positive attitudes toward cancer screening (p < 0.05). A weak but significant correlation (r = 0.247, p < 0.05) was found between healthy lifestyle behaviors and positive screening attitudes. Despite national screening programs, adherence to breast and cervical cancer screenings remained low (51.5% and 44.6%, respectively). Having a first-degree relative with cancer did not significantly influence screening behaviors. Conclusions: Gender, education, income, and marital status significantly influence cancer prevention behaviors. However, screening participation remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for targeted public health strategies. Improving health literacy and accessibility to screening programs could enhance cancer prevention efforts. Full article

Cancer literacy is essential for promoting preventive behaviors and making informed decisions for a healthier lifestyle. There are significant gaps in the knowledge of modifiable and non-modifiable cancer risk factors among university students. The objective of this study is to evaluate the level of cancer literacy, characterize motivations for volunteering, and explore possible associations between the variables, relating them to sociodemographic data. The sample comprised 308 higher education students aged 18 or above. A sociodemographic questionnaire, the Students Knowledge and Perceptions about Cancer test, and the Volunteer Functions Inventory were administered. The findings indicated higher levels of cancer literacy among females, students involved in volunteering, and those in the Medical and Health Sciences. Women placed more importance on experience, values, and growth functions in volunteering. The correlation between cancer literacy and motivations for volunteering proved to be significant for the experience and values functions. The findings of this study are particularly pertinent to the field of education, highlighting the need for strategies aimed at the prevention of the disease and the training of young adults in cancer literacy. Full article

The Artificial Intelligence Patient Librarian (AIPL) was designed to meet the psychosocial and supportive care needs of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) patients with HR+/HER2− subtypes. AIPL provides conversational patient education, answers user questions, and offers tailored online resource recommendations. This study, conducted in three phases, assessed AIPL’s impact on patients’ ability to manage their advanced disease. In Phase 1, educational content was adapted for chatbot delivery, and over 100 credible online resources were annotated using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to drive recommendations. Phase 2 involved 42 participants who completed pre- and post-surveys after using AIPL for two weeks. The surveys measured patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) tool and evaluated user experience with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Phase 3 included focus groups to explore user experiences in depth. Of the 42 participants, 36 completed the study, with 10 participating in focus groups. Most participants were aged 40–64. PAM scores showed no significant differences between pre-survey (mean = 59.33, SD = 5.19) and post-survey (mean = 59.22, SD = 6.16), while SUS scores indicated good usability. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: AIPL offers basic wellness and health guidance, provides limited support for managing relationships, offers limited condition-specific medical information, and is unable to offer hope to patients. Despite showing no impact on the PAM, possibly due to high baseline activation, AIPL demonstrated good usability and met basic information needs, particularly for newly diagnosed MBC patients. Future iterations will incorporate a large language model (LLM) to provide more comprehensive and personalized assistance. Full article

Background/Objectives: Medical mistrust (MM) is associated with adverse health outcomes, but few studies have assessed MM in cancer patients. MM is frequently measured using the Medical Mistrust Inventory (MMI), measuring institutional MM (e.g., government), or the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale (GBMMS), measuring race-based MM. We sought to assess the prevalence of MM among cancer patients diverse by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES), recruited from an urban safety net hospital and a suburban comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Patients completed a one-time survey. The primary outcome was MM as measured by the GBMMS and MMI tools. Covariates included demographics, treatment campus (urban vs. suburban), and psychosocial measures relevant to MM. Results: Purposeful sampling recruitment resulted in 200 participants (survey completion: 74.6%). The median age was 60 years, with 62% female, 45% African-American, 15% Hispanic, 47.5% education ≤ HS diploma, and 51.5% income ≤ USD 50,000/yr. Elevated MMI and GBMMS scores (moderate-to-high) were seen, respectively, in Hispanic (20.7% and 33.4%) and African-American (AA) patients (31.8% and 48.9%), compared with White patients (14.3% and 9.9%). The MMI and GBMMS tools captured complimentary aspects of MM in cancer patients (Spearman’s 0.531, p < 0.0001). MMI was associated with lower education (0.034) and race (p = 0.04), while GBMMS was strongly associated with race (p < 0.001), urban campus (p = 0.035), and mistrust of government/health organization information (both p < 0.05). Higher MMI/GBMMS scores were both associated with research mistrust and mistrust of information from physicians. Conclusions: Institutional and race-based MM are prevalent among cancer patients diverse by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and SES. Lower education was associated with institutional MM but not race-based MM. Full article

Background: The foreign-born population in the United States has reached a record high over the last three years. Significant disparities in cancer screening rates exist among this population, resulting in later-stage diagnoses and worse outcomes. This narrative review explores the sociodemographic factors, barriers, and interventions influencing cancer screening rates among foreign-born individuals in the U.S. Methods: A comprehensive review of studies was conducted to assess colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening disparities among immigrants. Factors examined include length of residence, race and ethnicity, income, education, citizenship, insurance, usual source of care, language, medical literacy, and cultural barriers. Furthermore, the effectiveness of educational interventions, patient navigators, and at-home testing in addressing these screening disparities was evaluated. Results: Immigrants have lower screening rates for colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer compared to U.S.-born individuals, with the largest disparities observed in colorectal cancer. Factors influencing these gaps include shorter duration of residence, Asian ethnicity, and lower income and education levels. Lack of health insurance and of a usual source of care are currently the most significant barriers to screening. Interventions such as education, patient navigation, and at-home testing have shown moderate success in improving screening rates, though data on their effectiveness remain limited. Conclusions: Addressing cancer screening disparities within the U.S. foreign-born population is essential, especially as the immigrant population continues to reach record numbers. Targeted interventions are needed to improve screening among immigrant groups with the lowest completion rates. Future research on these interventions should prioritize larger sample sizes, longitudinal studies, and the utility of new technologies such as artificial intelligence. Full article

A high prevalence of chronic diseases exposes diverse healthcare pain points due to the limited effectiveness of pharmaceutical drugs and biologics, sedentary lifestyles, insufficient health literacy, chronic stress, unsatisfactory patient experience, environmental pollution and competition with commercial determinants of health. To improve patient care and long-term outcomes, the impact of the home environment is overlooked and underutilized by healthcare. This cross-disciplinary work describes perspectives on (1) the home environment as a therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases and (2) transforming health-centric household goods e-commerce platforms into digital health interventions. We provide a rationale for creating therapeutic home environments grounded in biophilic design (multisensory, environmental enrichment) and supporting physical activities, quality sleep, nutrition, music, stress reduction, self-efficacy, social support and health education, hence providing clinical benefits through the modulation of the autonomic nervous system, neuroplasticity and behavior change. These pleiotropic “active non-pharmacological ingredients” can be personalized for people living with depression, anxiety, migraine, chronic pain, cancer, cardiovascular and other conditions. We discuss prospects for integrating e-commerce with digital health platforms to create “therapeutic home environment” interventions delivered through digital therapeutics and their combinations with prescription drugs. This multimodal approach can enhance patient engagement while bridging consumer spending with healthcare outcomes. Full article

(1) Background: Interventions addressing the health literacy (HL) of people suffering from an illness such as cancer can improve the understanding of the illness and lead to better-adapted behaviors, regarding the participation in cancer screenings, adhering to the complex multimodal therapy, participating in cancer treatment, and self-managing everyday health. This study provides a review of systematic reviews that include intervention articles addressing the HL of patients, healthcare professionals, and/or organizations in cancer, to identify the factors related to their effectiveness, as well as the missing elements, in light of the recent developments in HL research and practice. (2) Methods: A literature search was performed in Embase, Pubmed, PsycINFO, and Science Direct. Existing published reviews of studies targeting the interventions in the oncology domain, and which explicitly mentioned HL as a factor/outcome, were included. (3) Results: One hundred and fifty-five studies were retrieved. Ten fit the criteria and were included in this review. (4) Conclusions: Most of the interventions addressing HL in people with cancer included the target patients’ information and communication skills through education. To keep the full scope of the concept, as investigated in the recent literature, clinical applications of HL in patients with cancer should also consider organizational HL. Full article