Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bite jumping appliance

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 784 KiB  
Article
The Efficacy of the RME II System Compared with the Sander Bite-Jumping Appliance: A Retrospective Study
by Mauro Lorusso, Michele Tepedino, Donatella Ferrara, Angela Pia Cazzolla, Fariba Esperouz, Rosa Esposito, Lucio Lo Russo and Domenico Ciavarella
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3700; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113700 - 25 May 2025
Viewed by 411
Abstract
Objective: This paper aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) II System, compared to the Sander bite-jumping appliance (SBJ) and an untreated control group, in the treatment of Class II skeletal malocclusion in children. Methods: Thirty Class II patients [...] Read more.
Objective: This paper aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) II System, compared to the Sander bite-jumping appliance (SBJ) and an untreated control group, in the treatment of Class II skeletal malocclusion in children. Methods: Thirty Class II patients treated with the RME II System (Group R) were compared to 30 patients treated with the SBJ (Group S) and 30 untreated Class II children (Group C). Cephalograms were analysed at the beginning of the study (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1). Eight cephalometric parameters were evaluated: the divergence angle (SN-MP), ANB, lower face height (LFH), CO-GN, 1 + SN, IMPA, overjet, and overbite. The Shapiro–Wilk normality test was conducted to assess the distribution of the data. A t-test was then used for pairwise comparisons of the cephalometric measurements between T0 and T1. Differences among the groups were analysed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc correction. Results: ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference for all analysed variables except 1 + SN. The post hoc Tukey’s test identified the following differences: SN-MP was 2.51° greater in Group S than in Group R, LFH was 5.46 mm greater in Group C than in Group R and 3.11 mm greater in Group S than in Group R, IMPA was 4.01° greater in Group S than in Group R, and overbite was 1.96 mm lower in Group S than in Group R. Conclusions: The RME II System provides better control of mandibular plane inclination and lower incisor proclination during the correction of Class II skeletal malocclusion. Both devices are effective in correcting Class II skeletal malocclusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthodontics: Current Advances and Future Options)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3031 KiB  
Article
3D Evaluation of Upper Airway Morphological Changes in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion Using Sander Bite Jumping Appliance
by Paolo Faccioni, Andrea Butera, Silvia Bazzanella, Massimo Albanese, Simone Gallo, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Andrea Scribante and Alessia Pardo
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3908; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063908 - 19 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2947
Abstract
Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathia is associated with a posterior positioning of the tongue and the hyoid bone, reducing the oropharyngeal volume. This could be a contributing factor to the development of respiratory and cardiovascular problems. This study evaluates the oropharyngeal [...] Read more.
Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathia is associated with a posterior positioning of the tongue and the hyoid bone, reducing the oropharyngeal volume. This could be a contributing factor to the development of respiratory and cardiovascular problems. This study evaluates the oropharyngeal volume variation in 13 patients with class II malocclusion undergoing functional orthopedic treatment with Sander Bite Jumping Appliance (SBJ). CBCT scans were performed before treatment (T0) and approximately after 12.5 months (T1): the retropalatal volume and retroglossal volume were quantified in mm3 using a segmentation software. At T1, the retropalatal volume increased in 2523 ± 2088 mm3, and the retroglossal volume increased in 2258 ± 1717 mm3. Both values were statistically significant (p < 0.05). This widening of the airways may allow prevention and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Applications for Dentistry and Oral Health, 2nd Volume)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 11706 KiB  
Article
Gummy Smile Improvement during Growth Period Using a Simple Bite Jumping Appliance and High-Pull J-Hook HeadGear: A Case Series Study
by Takuma Sato, Masako Tabuchi, Misuzu Kawaguchi, Takeo Sekiya, Mifumi Takahashi, Ryo Asaoka, Ken Miyazawa and Shigemi Goto
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 12268; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312268 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 6642
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, a method for improving gummy smiles in adults using an orthodontic anchor screw has been reported, but there is yet to be a treatment for the gummy smiles of those in the growth period. Methods: We improved the gummy [...] Read more.
Purpose: In recent years, a method for improving gummy smiles in adults using an orthodontic anchor screw has been reported, but there is yet to be a treatment for the gummy smiles of those in the growth period. Methods: We improved the gummy smiles of three class II patients with vertical excessive growth of the upper jaw, during their growth period, using a simple bite jumping appliance (SBJA) and a high pull J-hook headgear. Results: It was found that SBJA promoted mandibular growth and the high-pull J-hook headgear inhibited the vertical growth of the maxillary anterior teeth. Conclusion: It is suggested that a combined use of high-pull J-hook headgear and SBJA is an effective way of improving gummy smiles in class II patients with vertical excessive growth of the upper jaw during their growth period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovation in Dental and Orthodontic Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop