Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = binary search space-structured VQ (BSS-VQ)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 461 KiB  
Article
An Upgraded Version of the Binary Search Space-Structured VQ Search Algorithm for AMR-WB Codec
by Cheng-Yu Yeh and Hung-Hsun Huang
Symmetry 2019, 11(2), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020283 - 22 Feb 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2756
Abstract
Adaptive multi-rate wideband (AMR-WB) speech codecs have been widely used for high speech quality in modern mobile communication systems, e.g., handheld mobile devices. Nevertheless, a major handicap is that a remarkable computational load is required in the vector quantization (VQ) of immittance spectral [...] Read more.
Adaptive multi-rate wideband (AMR-WB) speech codecs have been widely used for high speech quality in modern mobile communication systems, e.g., handheld mobile devices. Nevertheless, a major handicap is that a remarkable computational load is required in the vector quantization (VQ) of immittance spectral frequency (ISF) coefficients of an AMR-WB coding. In view of this, a two-stage search algorithm is presented in this paper as an efficient way to reduce the computational complexity of ISF quantization in AMR-WB coding. At stage 1, an input vector is assigned to a search subspace in an efficient manner using the binary search space-structured VQ (BSS-VQ) algorithm, and a codebook search is performed over the subspace at stage 2 using the iterative triangular inequality elimination (ITIE) approach. Through the use of the codeword rejection mechanisms equipped in both stages, the computational load can be remarkably reduced. As compared with the original version of the BSS-VQ algorithm, the upgraded version provides a computational load reduction of up to 51%. Furthermore, this work is expected to satisfy the energy saving requirement when implemented on an AMR-WB codec of mobile devices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 633 KiB  
Article
An Efficient VQ Codebook Search Algorithm Applied to AMR-WB Speech Coding
by Cheng-Yu Yeh
Symmetry 2017, 9(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9040054 - 12 Apr 2017
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4548
Abstract
The adaptive multi-rate wideband (AMR-WB) speech codec is widely used in modern mobile communication systems for high speech quality in handheld devices. Nonetheless, a major disadvantage is that vector quantization (VQ) of immittance spectral frequency (ISF) coefficients takes a considerable computational load in [...] Read more.
The adaptive multi-rate wideband (AMR-WB) speech codec is widely used in modern mobile communication systems for high speech quality in handheld devices. Nonetheless, a major disadvantage is that vector quantization (VQ) of immittance spectral frequency (ISF) coefficients takes a considerable computational load in the AMR-WB coding. Accordingly, a binary search space-structured VQ (BSS-VQ) algorithm is adopted to efficiently reduce the complexity of ISF quantization in AMR-WB. This search algorithm is done through a fast locating technique combined with lookup tables, such that an input vector is efficiently assigned to a subspace where relatively few codeword searches are required to be executed. In terms of overall search performance, this work is experimentally validated as a superior search algorithm relative to a multiple triangular inequality elimination (MTIE), a TIE with dynamic and intersection mechanisms (DI-TIE), and an equal-average equal-variance equal-norm nearest neighbor search (EEENNS) approach. With a full search algorithm as a benchmark for overall search load comparison, this work provides an 87% search load reduction at a threshold of quantization accuracy of 0.96, a figure far beyond 55% in the MTIE, 76% in the EEENNS approach, and 83% in the DI-TIE approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop