Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = anhedral angle

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 8868 KiB  
Article
Effect of Blade Tip Configurations on the Performance and Vibration of a Lift-Offset Coaxial Rotor
by Yu-Been Lee and Jae-Sang Park
Aerospace 2023, 10(2), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10020187 - 16 Feb 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4440
Abstract
This present study investigates the effect of blade tip configurations, such as the sweepback angle and anhedral angle, on the performance and hub vibratory loads for the lift-offset coaxial rotor of a 30,000-pound-class high-speed long-range utility helicopter. The rotorcraft comprehensive analysis code, CAMRAD [...] Read more.
This present study investigates the effect of blade tip configurations, such as the sweepback angle and anhedral angle, on the performance and hub vibratory loads for the lift-offset coaxial rotor of a 30,000-pound-class high-speed long-range utility helicopter. The rotorcraft comprehensive analysis code, CAMRAD II, is utilized to conduct the performance and hub vibratory load analyses for the present lift-offset coaxial rotor. The total rotor thrust, torque, and individual rotor’s hub pitch moment and hub roll moment are considered the trim targets. The general properties for the lift-offset coaxial rotor are designed from the X2TD, S-97 Raider, and SB > 1 Defiant, which are lift-offset compound helicopters. The rotor performance and hub vibratory loads are studied with the various blade tip configurations including the sweepback angle and anhedral angle. The rotor power when the rotor blade tip considers only the sweepback angle (20°) is lower than the baseline rotor model by 41.25% at 170 knots. The maximum rotor effective lift-to-drag ratio (L/De) for the lift-offset coaxial rotor using only the sweepback angle and the rotor with both sweepback (20°) and anhedral angles (10°) at 170 knots increase by 10.82% and 5.02%, respectively, compared with the baseline rotor model without both sweepback and anhedral angles. The vibration index (VI) for the rotor with only the sweepback angle is higher than that for the baseline rotor model without both sweepback and anhedral angles by 37.14%. Furthermore, when the rotor blade tip has the anhedral angle, the magnitude of the Blade Vortex Interaction (BVI) decreases compared with the rotor without the sweepback and anhedral angles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4750 KiB  
Article
Wake behind a Compound Wing in Ground Effect
by Saeed Jamei, Adi Maimun, Rasul Niazmand Bilandi, Nor Azwadi, Simone Mancini, Luigi Vitiello and Maria De Carlini
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(3), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030156 - 1 Mar 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4623
Abstract
Flow structure is a crucial point for the conceptual design of Wing-in-Ground effect (WIG) crafts. In this study, pressure distributions around a compound wing, velocity and the turbulent intensity distribution in the wake area after trailing of the wing, have been investigated numerically. [...] Read more.
Flow structure is a crucial point for the conceptual design of Wing-in-Ground effect (WIG) crafts. In this study, pressure distributions around a compound wing, velocity and the turbulent intensity distribution in the wake area after trailing of the wing, have been investigated numerically. Computational simulations were completed regarding various angles of attack in-ground-effect. Two parts made up the compound wing: The first composed by one rectangular wing in the center, the second composed by a reverse taper wing, consisting of an anhedral angle at the side. A realizable k-ε turbulent model exhibited the flow field in the physical domain about the wing surface. The numerical results of the compound wing were validated using the data provided by wind tunnel tests. The flow structures around the compound wing were compared with that of a rectangular wing for different conditions. It was found that the pressure distribution on the rectangular wing was weaker than at the lower surface for the compound wing. However, the suction effect on the upper surface of the rectangular wing was higher. Also, the velocity defect and the turbulence level in the wake area was greater behind the compound wing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop