Search Results (4)

The aim is to investigate the impact of retention type, implant/abutment angulation, and the presence of sealant/antimicrobial agents on screw loosening of implant-supported restorations. Fifty dental implants along with their respective abutments and screws were allocated to five groups (n = 10). The groups were categorized based on type of crown retention (screw-/cement-retained), implant/abutment angulation (0°/20°), and type of disinfectant/sealant as follows: Cem_control (cemented/0°/none), Cem_GP (cemented/0°/gutta-percha), Cem_CHX (cemented/0°/chlorhexidine), Cem_Ang (cemented/20°/none), and Screw (screwed/0°/ none). Abutment screws were tightened (20 Ncm), and CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated. Glass ionomer cement was used for crown cementation in the cemented groups. Samples were subjected to dynamic loading in a chewing simulator (1,200,000 cycles/98 N). After loading, the reverse torque values (RTVs) of the abutment screws were determined (Ncm) using an electronic screwdriver, and the reverse torque difference (RTD) was subsequently calculated. The lowest RTD was reported in group Cem_GP (−2.22 ± 1.03), whereas the highest RTD was seen in group Screw (−4.65 ± 1.79). Group Screw showed a statistically significant difference from all other groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference between the cemented test groups Cem_GP, Cem_CHX, and Cem_Ang and the control group was found. Screw-retained restorations exhibited significantly greater RTD values compared to cement-retained ones. Implant/abutment angulation and the sealant/disinfectant appeared to have no notable effect on the screw stability of single-implant restorations. Full article

Angulated-screw channels (ASCs) allow the clinician to employ screw-retained restorations in almost all cases, as the access hole can be moved away from the vestibular portion of the crown, where it would jeopardize the final esthetic result. The objective of this study was to compare screw-retained restorations employing ASCs with restorations cemented on angled abutments. In this study, 30 subjects, equally divided into two groups: group 1 (cemented restorations on angulated abutments) and group 2 (screw-retained restorations adopting ASCs), were treated and retrospectively compared after 2 years using the pink esthetic score (PES) and the white esthetic score (WES). All restorations were in use at the last follow-up, with a survival rate of 100%. Three mechanical complications were observed (2 chippings and 1 crown came loose), with a success rate of 93% in group 1 and 87% in group 2 (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were reported regarding the esthetic outcome; the marginal bone loss (MBL) showed better results for the screw-retained restorations, both at the distal aspect (group 1 = 0.98 mm ± 0.16; group 2 = 0.45 mm ± 0.06; p = 0.006) and at the mesial aspect (group 1 = 1.04 ± 0.27; group 2 = 0.45 ± 0.005; p < 0.001). From an esthetical perspective, screw-retained restorations with ASCs and cemented restorations on angulated abutments are both effective means of restoring implants; both have excellent esthetic outcomes, but screw-retained restorations have reduced bone loss when compared to cemented ones but are more prone to mechanical complications. Still, our results must be cautiously observed given the reduced dimension of our sample. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. Full article

Background: Dental implant abutment screw loosening is an increasingly common problem, as evidenced by multiple studies that have investigated its causes. The objective of this study was to compare the screw loosening torque values before and after cyclic loading and to determine whether they are affected by the CAD/CAM abutment manufacturing technique (machined or laser-sintered) and abutment angulation. Materials and Methods: Ninety implants were used and divided into two groups: 45 implants received machined abutments (group A) and 45 implants received laser-sintered abutments (group B). Each group was further divided into three subgroups, with 15 implants each, based on the abutment angulation involved (0°, 15° and 20°). The abutments were tightened to the torque recommended by the manufacturer, and the reverse torque value was measured before and after cyclic loading (300,000 cycles). Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the laser-sintered and machined groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, differences were observed between subgroups with different angulations for both machined (16.2 ± 1.75, 14.7 ± 1.74 and 13.4 ± 1.08 Ncm) and laser-sintered abutments (14.6 ± 1.25, 12.7 ± 1.2 and 11.1 ± 1.35 Ncm) (0°, 15° and 20°, respectively). Conclusions: The final screw loosening torque after cyclic loading was lower than the initial loosening torque. Both abutment angulation and the CAD/CAM manufacturing method exerted a statistically significant influence on the final loosening torque. The abutment angulation factor was estimated to have an influence of 34.5%, while the abutment manufacturing method was estimated to have an influence of 21%. Full article

This in vitro experiment aimed to understand the difference in preload acting on an abutment screw under different angles of angulated screw-retained crown and the performance after cyclic loading. In total, thirty implants with angulated screw channel (ASC) abutments were divided into two parts. The first part consisted of three groups: a 0° access channel with a zirconia crown (ASC-0) (n = 5), a 15° access channel with a specially designed zirconia crown (sASC-15) (n = 5), and a 25° access channel with a specially designed zirconia crown (sASC-25) (n = 5). The reverse torque value (RTV) was measured at 0° for each specimen. The second part consisted of three groups: a 0° access channel with a zirconia crown (ASC-0) (n = 5); a 15° access channel with a zirconia crown (ASC-15) (n = 5), and a 25° access channel with a zirconia crown (ASC-25) (n = 5). The manufacturer’s recommended torque was applied to each specimen, and baseline RTV was measured before cyclic loading. Each ASC implant assembly was cyclically loaded at 0 to 40 N with 1 million cycles at 10 Hz. RTV was measured after cyclic loading. Kruskal–Wallis test and Jonckheere–Terpstra test were used for statistical analysis. All specimens were examined under a digital microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to observe the wear of the screw head before and after the whole experiment. A significant difference in the different percentages of straight RTV (sRTV) between the three groups was found (p = 0.027). The angle of ASC to the different percentages of sRTV showed a significant linear trend (p = 0.003). No significant differences were found in RTV difference after cyclic loading among the ASC-0, ASC-15, and ASC-25 groups (p = 0.212). The ASC-25 group had the most serious degree of wear based on a digital microscope and SEM examination. The ASC angle will affect the actual preload acting on a screw: the larger the ASC angle, the smaller the preload. The performance of the angled ASC groups in RTV difference was comparable to that of 0° ASC after cyclic loading. Full article