Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = amputee football

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 4207 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Lower Back Pain and Phantom Pain in Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees: A Study on Amputee Football Players vs. Non-Athletes
by Aleksandra Jóźwik, Agnieszka Wnuk-Scardaccione and Jan Bilski
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 2047; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122047 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1160
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Amputation poses a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge, with over 90.0% of amputations involving the lower limbs, of which 75.0% are associated with diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Individuals with lower limb amputations often experience secondary disabilities. This study [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Amputation poses a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge, with over 90.0% of amputations involving the lower limbs, of which 75.0% are associated with diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Individuals with lower limb amputations often experience secondary disabilities. This study aimed to compare the frequency and intensity of lower back pain and phantom pain in individuals with unilateral lower limb amputations who were amputee football players with those who did not participate in adaptive sports. Materials and Methods: This study included 30 men who had undergone unilateral lower limb amputation and were divided into two groups: 15 amputee football players and 15 men who did not participate in adapted sports. Testing included proprietary surveys, questionnaires, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity. The Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMPnoPRO) was used to assess motor function. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica software (Version 13, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) by applying Student’s t-test, the Mann–Whitney U test, correlation coefficients, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Phantom pain was reported in 53.3% of individuals in the study group and in 66.7% of individuals in the control group, with average median pain intensities of 5.5 (IQR: 2) and 5.5 (IQR: 3), respectively. Lower back pain was significantly higher in the control group (86.7%) than for the football players (33.3%), with median pain intensities of 4 (IQR: 2) and 3 (IQR: 2), respectively. The median disability score was 3 (IQR: 3) in the player group and 10 (IQR: 7) in the control group. The median score in the amputee football player group was 35 (IQR: 2), while that in the control group was only 18 (IQR: 19). Conclusions: Amputee football training did not have a significant impact on the frequency or intensity of phantom pain but was associated with lower occurrence and intensity of pain in the lower back. The players exhibited significantly better motor function and lower levels of disability. Preoperative limb pain was a significant risk factor for phantom pain in the study group. Adaptive sports can not only support the development of motor and social skills but also contribute to reducing the severity of lower back pain, which leads to a decrease in the level of disability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Medicine and Sports Traumatology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3352 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Pain and External Load in Amputee Football Using Digital Pain Drawing and GNSS Tracking—A Pilot Study
by Jarosław Muracki, Adam Kawczyński, Michał Nowak, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Piotr Makar, Zofia Kasińska and Shellie Ann Boudreau
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 6978; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146978 - 10 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1899
Abstract
Amputee Football (AF) players move using lofstrand crutches (LC) and a single leg during training and matches, which may expose them to excessive loads. Due to a lack of scientific articles describing these issues, this pilot study aims to gain insight into the [...] Read more.
Amputee Football (AF) players move using lofstrand crutches (LC) and a single leg during training and matches, which may expose them to excessive loads. Due to a lack of scientific articles describing these issues, this pilot study aims to gain insight into the assessment of pain experiences, as well as external loads during training and matches in AF. An observational study design was followed. Twelve male AF players (2 goalkeepers—GK and 10 field players—FP), 29.9 ± 8.7 years, stature 178.3 ± 6.5 cm, body mass 77.2 ± 8.9 kg were involved in the study. After stature and body mass measures, participants filled out the questionnaire for pain. The players were familiarized with digital pain drawing (DPD). Afterwards, they reported pain typically felt in relation to regular AF training and playing matches—recall pain (RP). During a two-day training camp (TC) with two training sessions each day and during a two-day international tournament (IT) with two matches each day, the players were monitored using DPD, rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and overall pain level (OPL) scales. In addition, during an international tournament (IT), match players were monitored using a GNSS tracking system for external load assessment. All of the participants reported multiple locations of pain after AF training or a match. The area of recall pain (RP) was the highest: +0.5% when compared to the end of TC and +43% when compared to end of IT. The pain area registered at the end of IT was significantly lower (p = 0.028) compared to RP and lower without statistical significance when compared to the end of TC. Average RPE was 3.31 ± 1.38 and average OPL was 2.86 ± 1.81 in 0–10 scale. Typical RPE was higher than that registered at the end of IT. Also typical OPL was higher compared to that registered after the end of TC, which was higher than after the end of IT. The average distance covered by a FP during a match ranged from 2483.14 ± 583.64 m to 2911.08 ± 828.90 m. AF field players suffered pain as a consequence of training and matches. The loads coming from playing and training, combined with pain, may lead to injuries. Further research directions should include assessments of the relationship of pain characteristics, injuries and GNSS tracking parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanical and Physiological Measurement in Sports)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 405 KiB  
Review
Sports Performance Tests for Amputee Football Players: A Scoping Review
by Agnieszka Magdalena Nowak, Jolanta Marszalek and Bartosz Molik
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4386; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074386 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4012
Abstract
Background: This scoping review aims to identify sports performance tests for amputee football players and to critically analyze the methodological quality, validation data, reliability, and standardization of sport-specific tests to indicate the best-fitting tests. Methods: Electronic database searches were conducted between January 2019 [...] Read more.
Background: This scoping review aims to identify sports performance tests for amputee football players and to critically analyze the methodological quality, validation data, reliability, and standardization of sport-specific tests to indicate the best-fitting tests. Methods: Electronic database searches were conducted between January 2019 and October 2021. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Qualitative assessment of each study was conducted by STROBE checklist. Results: Twenty-nine sports performance tests were identified. No sports performance test fully met all three criteria associated with the qualitative assessment of tests. The critical appraisal of the articles demonstrates a gap in study design, settings, and main results description. Some inconsistencies were found in the methodological descriptions of tests assessing the same motor skill. A STROBE score of 13 points was considered a satisfactory score for the article (it was obtained by 8 of the 12 studies). The weakest point of the analyzed studies was the description of how the test group size was accessed and later obtained. Conclusions: No test was found that was simultaneously presented as valid, reliable, and standardized. The authors can recommend the use of the two-sports performance tests that are the closest to ideal: the L test and the YYIRT1. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop