Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

remove_circle_outline

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = VDLZ

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1162 KB  
Systematic Review
Comparative Risk of Complications Following Intestinal Surgery After Infliximab, Vedolizumab, or Ustekinumab Treatment: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
by Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Georgios Tzikos, George Petrakis, Patroklos Goulas, Panagiotis V. Karathanasis and Stylianos Apostolidis
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(10), 1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18101466 - 29 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1624
Abstract
Background: Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with biological therapies has significantly increased, with ever increasing numbers of patients receiving such treatment at the time of surgery. This study evaluates the perioperative safety of three commonly used biologics—Infliximab, Vedolizumab, or Ustekinumab—in patients undergoing [...] Read more.
Background: Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with biological therapies has significantly increased, with ever increasing numbers of patients receiving such treatment at the time of surgery. This study evaluates the perioperative safety of three commonly used biologics—Infliximab, Vedolizumab, or Ustekinumab—in patients undergoing intestinal surgery for IBDs. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review a comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, Medline and PubMed up to January 2025 by two independent reviewers, and a total of 34 articles (retrospective studies in the majority of them) reporting total surgical complications of patients treated with these three agents, in comparison to a control group, were included. Relative risks were aggregated using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and the I2 statistic was used to assess between-study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted for particular complications, and direct comparisons among the biological agents were made. Results: In the primary analysis, INFL was not linked to a statistically significant rise in overall postoperative complications when compared to controls (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90–1.42, p = 0.31). VDLZ exhibited a non-significant inclination towards increased complications (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.94–1.67, p = 0.12), although it was linked to a notably higher risk of postoperative ileus compared to INFL (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.59–3.29, p < 0.00001). USTK also did not show significant differences from controls overall (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.20–1.57, p = 0.26), though it was associated with a considerably lower risk of SSIs (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17–0.73, p = 0.005). There were no significant distinctions between the biological agents regarding SSIs or anastomotic leakage, although many comparisons faced challenges due to high heterogeneity and low event rates. Conclusions: USTK demonstrated the most favorable safety profile, while VDLZ was associated with higher rates of ileus and inflammatory complications. However, prospective studies are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biopharmaceuticals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop