Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = UW_YOLOv3

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 3355 KiB  
Article
A Deep Learning Model Applied to Optical Image Target Detection and Recognition for the Identification of Underwater Biostructures
by Huilin Ge, Yuewei Dai, Zhiyu Zhu and Runbang Liu
Machines 2022, 10(9), 809; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10090809 - 15 Sep 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3129
Abstract
Objective: We propose a deep-learning-based underwater target detection system that can effectively solve the problem of underwater optical image target detection and recognition. Methods: In this paper, based on the depth of the underwater optical image target detection and recognition and using a [...] Read more.
Objective: We propose a deep-learning-based underwater target detection system that can effectively solve the problem of underwater optical image target detection and recognition. Methods: In this paper, based on the depth of the underwater optical image target detection and recognition and using a learning model, we put forward corresponding solutions using the concept of style migration solutions, such as training samples. A lack of variability and poor generalization of practical applications presents a challenge for underwater object identification. The UW_YOLOv3 lightweight model was proposed to solve the problems of calculating energy consumption and storage resource limitations in underwater application scenarios. The detection and recognition module, based on deep learning, can deal with the degradation process of underwater imaging by embedding an image enhancement module into the detection and recognition module for the joint tuning and transferring of knowledge. Results: The detection accuracy of the UW_YOLOv3 model designed in this paper outperformed the lightweight algorithm YOLOV3-TINY by 7.9% at the same image scale input. Compared with other large algorithms, the detection accuracy was lower, but the detection speed was much higher. Compared with the SSD algorithm, the detection accuracy was only 4.7 lower; the speed was 40.9 FPS higher; and the rate was nearly 16 times higher than Faster R-CNN. When the input scale was 224, although part of the accuracy was lost, the detection speed doubled, reaching 156.9 FPS. Conclusion: Based on our framework, the problem of underwater optical image target detection and recognition can be effectively solved. Relevant studies have not only enriched the theory of target detection and glory, but have also provided optical glasses with a clear vision for appropriate underwater application systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop