Search Results (2)

The end of the Cretaceous saw the Western Interior Seaway divide North America into two land masses, Laramidia in the west and Appalachia in the east. Laramidian dinosaurs inhabited a narrow strip of land extending from Mexico to Alaska. Within this geographically restricted area, dinosaurs evolved high diversity and endemism, with distinct species in the north and south. Here, we report a new tyrannosaurid from the Late Campanian-aged Cerro del Pueblo Formation of Coahuila, Mexico, which is part of a tribe of tyrannosaurs originating in southern Laramidia. Phylogenetic analysis recovers the new tyrannosaur as part of a clade including Labocania anomala from the La Bocana Roja Formation of Baja California Norte, Bistahieversor sealeyi from the Kirtland Formation of New Mexico, Teratophoneus curriei from the Kaiparowits Formation in Utah, and Dynamoterror dynastes from the Menefee Formation of New Mexico. Distinct frontal morphology and the younger age (~72.5–73 Ma versus >75.8 Ma for L. anomala) support recognition of the new tyrannosaur as a distinct species of Labocania, Labocania aguillonae. The Labocania clade dominated southern Laramidia at a time when the north was dominated by daspletosaurins and albertosaurines. The high endemism seen in tyrannosaurids is remarkable, given that modern apex predators have large geographic ranges and hints that the diversity of carnivorous dinosaurs has been underestimated. Full article

Tyrannosaurs are among the most intensively studied and best-known dinosaurs. Despite this, their relationships and systematics are highly controversial. An ongoing debate concerns the validity of Nanotyrannus lancensis, interpreted either as a distinct genus of small-bodied tyrannosaur or a juvenile of Tyrannosaurus rex. We examine multiple lines of evidence and show that the evidence strongly supports recognition of Nanotyrannus as a distinct species for the following reasons: 1. High diversity of tyrannosaurs and predatory dinosaurs supports the idea that multiple tyrannosaurids inhabited the late Maastrichtian of Laramidia; 2. Nanotyrannus lacks characters supporting referral to Tyrannosaurus or Tyrannosaurinae but differs from T. rex in >150 morphological characters, while intermediate forms combining the features of Nanotyrannus and T. rex are unknown; 3. Histology shows specimens of Nanotyrannus showing (i) skeletal fusions, (ii) mature skull bone textures, (iii) slow growth rates relative to T. rex, (iv) decelerating growth in their final years of life, and (v) growth curves predicting adult masses of ~1500 kg or less, showing these animals are subadults and young adults, not juvenile Tyrannosaurus; 4. growth series of other tyrannosaurids, including Tarbosaurus and Gorgosaurus, do not show morphological changes proposed for a Nanotyrannus–Tyrannosaurus growth series, and deriving Tyrannosaurus from Nanotyrannus requires several changes inconsistent with known patterns of dinosaur development; 5. Juvenile T. rex exist, showing diagnostic features of Tyrannosaurus; 6. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that Nanotyrannus may lie outside Tyrannosauridae. Tyrannosaur diversity before the K-Pg extinction is higher than previously appreciated. The challenges inherent in diagnosing species based on fossils mean paleontologists may be systematically underestimating the diversity of ancient ecosystems. Full article