Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (17)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = TNBC molecular classification

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 831 KiB  
Article
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Using Different Types of Tracers According to Molecular Subtypes and Breast Density—A Randomized Clinical Study
by Ionut Flaviu Faur, Amadeus Dobrescu, Ioana Adelina Clim, Paul Pasca, Catalin Prodan-Barbulescu, Cristi Tarta, Carmen Neamtu, Alexandru Isaic, Dan Brebu, Vlad Braicu, Catalin Vladut Ionut Feier, Ciprian Duta and Bogdan Totolici
Diagnostics 2024, 14(21), 2439; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212439 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 2339
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a method more and more frequently used in loco-regional breast cancer in the initial stages. Starting from the first report on the technical feasibility of the sentinel node method in breast cancer, published by Krag [...] Read more.
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a method more and more frequently used in loco-regional breast cancer in the initial stages. Starting from the first report on the technical feasibility of the sentinel node method in breast cancer, published by Krag (1993) and Giuliano (1994), the method underwent numerous improvements and was also largely used worldwide. Methods: This article is a prospective study that took place at the “SJUPBT Surgery Clinic Timisoara” over a period of 1 year between July 2023 and July 2024, during which 137 underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on the current guidelines. For the identification of sentinel lymph nodes, we used various methods, including single traces and also a dual tracer and triple tracer. Results: Breast density represents a predictive biomarker for the identification rate of a sentinel node, being directly correlated with BMI (above 30 kg/m2) and with an age of above 50 years. The classification of the patients according to breast density represents an important criterion given that an adipose breast density (Tabar-Gram I-II) represents a lower IR of SLN compared with a density of the fibro-nodular type (Tabar-Gram III-V). We did not obtain any statistically significant data for the linear correlations between IR and the molecular profile, whether referring to the luminal subtypes (Luminal A and Luminal B) or to the non-luminal ones (HER2+ and TNBC), with p > 0.05, 0.201 [0.88, 0.167]; z = 1.82. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1308 KiB  
Article
Decoding Breast Cancer: Using Radiomics to Non-Invasively Unveil Molecular Subtypes Directly from Mammographic Images
by Manon A. G. Bakker, Maria de Lurdes Ovalho, Nuno Matela and Ana M. Mota
J. Imaging 2024, 10(9), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10090218 - 4 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2303
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The therapy used and its success depend highly on the histology of the tumor. This study aimed to explore the potential of predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer using radiomic features extracted from [...] Read more.
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The therapy used and its success depend highly on the histology of the tumor. This study aimed to explore the potential of predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer using radiomic features extracted from screening digital mammography (DM) images. A retrospective study was performed using the OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB). Four binary classification tasks were performed: luminal A vs. non-luminal A, luminal B vs. non-luminal B, TNBC vs. non-TNBC, and HER2 vs. non-HER2. Feature selection was carried out by Pearson correlation and LASSO. The support vector machine (SVM) and naive Bayes (NB) ML classifiers were used, and their performance was evaluated with the accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A total of 186 patients were included in the study: 58 luminal A, 35 luminal B, 52 TNBC, and 41 HER2. The SVM classifier resulted in AUCs during testing of 0.855 for luminal A, 0.812 for luminal B, 0.789 for TNBC, and 0.755 for HER2, respectively. The NB classifier showed AUCs during testing of 0.714 for luminal A, 0.746 for luminal B, 0.593 for TNBC, and 0.714 for HER2. The SVM classifier outperformed NB with statistical significance for luminal A (p = 0.0268) and TNBC (p = 0.0073). Our study showed the potential of radiomics for non-invasive breast cancer subtype classification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2423 KiB  
Article
Proteomic Profiling of HDL in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Based on Tumor Molecular Classification and Clinical Stage of Disease
by Monique de Fatima Mello Santana, Maria Isabela Bloise Alves Caldas Sawada, Douglas Ricardo Souza Junior, Marcia Benacchio Giacaglia, Mozania Reis, Jacira Xavier, Maria Lucia Côrrea-Giannella, Francisco Garcia Soriano, Luiz Henrique Gebrim, Graziella Eliza Ronsein and Marisa Passarelli
Cells 2024, 13(16), 1327; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13161327 - 9 Aug 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1895
Abstract
The association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and breast cancer (BC) remains controversial due to the high complexity of the HDL particle and its functionality. The HDL proteome was determined in newly diagnosed BC classified according to the molecular type [luminal A or [...] Read more.
The association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and breast cancer (BC) remains controversial due to the high complexity of the HDL particle and its functionality. The HDL proteome was determined in newly diagnosed BC classified according to the molecular type [luminal A or B (LA or LB), HER2, and triple-negative (TN)] and clinical stage of the disease. Women (n = 141) aged between 18 and 80 years with BC, treatment-naïve, and healthy women [n = 103; control group (CT)], matched by age and body mass index, were included. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics was performed in isolated HDL (D = 1.063–1.21 g/mL). Results: Paraoxonase1, carnosine dipeptidase1, immunoglobulin mMu heavy chain constant region (IGHM), apoA-4, and transthyretin were reduced, and serum amyloid A2 and tetranectin were higher in BC compared to CT. In TNBC, apoA-1, apoA-2, apoC-2, and apoC-4 were reduced compared to LA, LB, and HER2, and apoA-4 compared to LA and HER2. ComplementC3, lambda immunoglobulin2/3, serpin3, IGHM, complement9, alpha2 lysine rich-glycoprotein1, and complement4B were higher in TNBC in comparison to all other types; complement factor B and vitamin D-binding protein were in contrast to LA and HER2, and plasminogen compared to LA and LB. In grouped stages III + IV, tetranectin and alpha2-macroglobulin were reduced, and haptoglobin-related protein; lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase, serum amyloid A1, and IGHM were increased compared to stages I + II. Conclusions: A differential proteomic profile of HDL in BC based on tumor molecular classification and the clinical stage of the disease may contribute to a better understanding of the association of HDL with BC pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Methods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2086 KiB  
Review
Genomic Alterations Affecting Competitive Endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) and Regulatory Networks (ceRNETs) with Clinical Implications in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
by Amal Qattan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(5), 2624; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052624 - 23 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2719
Abstract
The concept of competitive endogenous RNA regulation has brought on a change in the way we think about transcriptional regulation by miRNA–mRNA interactions. Rather than the relatively simple idea of miRNAs negatively regulating mRNA transcripts, mRNAs and other non-coding RNAs can regulate miRNAs [...] Read more.
The concept of competitive endogenous RNA regulation has brought on a change in the way we think about transcriptional regulation by miRNA–mRNA interactions. Rather than the relatively simple idea of miRNAs negatively regulating mRNA transcripts, mRNAs and other non-coding RNAs can regulate miRNAs and, therefore, broad networks of gene products through competitive interactions. While this concept is not new, its significant roles in and implications on cancer have just recently come to light. The field is now ripe for the extrapolation of technologies with a substantial clinical impact on cancer. With the majority of the genome consisting of non-coding regions encoding regulatory RNAs, genomic alterations in cancer have considerable effects on these networks that have been previously unappreciated. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high mutational burden, genomic instability and heterogeneity, making this aggressive breast cancer subtype particularly relevant to these changes. In the past few years, much has been learned about the roles of competitive endogenous RNA network regulation in tumorigenesis, disease progression and drug response in triple-negative breast cancer. In this review, we present a comprehensive view of the new knowledge and future perspectives on competitive endogenous RNA networks affected by genomic alterations in triple-negative breast cancer. An overview of the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis and its bearing on cellular function and disease is provided, followed by a thorough review of the literature surrounding key competitive endogenous RNAs in triple-negative breast cancer, the genomic alterations affecting them, key disease-relevant molecular and functional pathways regulated by them and the clinical implications and significance of their dysregulation. New knowledge of the roles of these regulatory mechanisms and the current acceleration of research in the field promises to generate insights into the diagnosis, classification and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer through the elucidation of new molecular mechanisms, therapeutic targets and biomarkers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translational Research in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3434 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Markers in Tyrosine Kinases Specific to Basal-like 2 Subtype of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
by Praopim Limsakul, Pongsakorn Choochuen, Thawirasm Jungrungrueang and Krit Charupanit
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031405 - 24 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3118
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a heterogeneous and therapeutically challenging subtype, comprises over 50% of patients categorized into basal-like 1 (BL1) and basal-like 2 (BL2) intrinsic molecular subtypes. Despite their shared basal-like classification, BL2 is associated with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and [...] Read more.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a heterogeneous and therapeutically challenging subtype, comprises over 50% of patients categorized into basal-like 1 (BL1) and basal-like 2 (BL2) intrinsic molecular subtypes. Despite their shared basal-like classification, BL2 is associated with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and reduced relapse-free survival compared to BL1. Here, the study focused on identifying subtype-specific markers for BL2 through transcriptomic analysis of TNBC patients using RNA-seq and clinical integration. Six receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) genes, including EGFR, EPHA4, EPHB2, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and ROR1, were identified as potential differentiators for BL2. Correlations between TK mRNA expression and TNBC prognosis, particularly EGFR, PDGFRA, and PDGFRB, revealed potential synergistic interactions in pathways related to cell survival and proliferation. Our findings also suggest promising dual markers for predicting disease prognosis. Furthermore, RT-qPCR validation demonstrated that identified BL2-specific TKs were expressed at a higher level in BL2 than in BL1 cell lines, providing insights into unique characteristics. This study advances the understanding of TNBC heterogeneity within the basal-like subtypes, which could lead to novel clinical treatment approaches and the development of targeted therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2501 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging
by Juliana Pereira Lopes Gonçalves, Christine Bollwein, Aurelia Noske, Anne Jacob, Paul Jank, Sibylle Loibl, Valentina Nekljudova, Peter A. Fasching, Thomas Karn, Frederik Marmé, Volkmar Müller, Christian Schem, Bruno Valentin Sinn, Elmar Stickeler, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Carsten Denkert, Wilko Weichert and Kristina Schwamborn
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2860; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032860 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3572
Abstract
Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status stratify the different subtypes of breast cancer and define the treatment course. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which does not register receptor overexpression, is often associated with worse patient prognosis. [...] Read more.
Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status stratify the different subtypes of breast cancer and define the treatment course. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which does not register receptor overexpression, is often associated with worse patient prognosis. Mass spectrometry imaging transcribes the molecular content of tissue specimens without requiring additional tags or preliminary analysis of the samples, being therefore an excellent methodology for an unbiased determination of tissue constituents, in particular tumor markers. In this study, the proteomic content of 1191 human breast cancer samples was characterized by mass spectrometry imaging and the epithelial regions were employed to train and test machine-learning models to characterize the individual receptor status and to classify TNBC. The classification models presented yielded high accuracies for estrogen and progesterone receptors and over 95% accuracy for classification of TNBC. Analysis of the molecular features revealed that vimentin overexpression is associated with TNBC, supported by immunohistochemistry validation, revealing a new potential target for diagnosis and treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Biomarker Discovery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 537 KiB  
Review
Optimal Assessment of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma: The Value of Cytopathology Combined with Molecular Analysis
by Ricella Souza da Silva and Fernando Schmitt
J. Mol. Pathol. 2022, 3(4), 329-338; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3040028 - 22 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2491
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains in most cases an incurable disease with genetic complexity and heterogeneity. Improvements in classification and management have been introduced, in addition to the development of endocrine and anti-HER2 targeted therapies. Currently, efforts are being made to delineate the [...] Read more.
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains in most cases an incurable disease with genetic complexity and heterogeneity. Improvements in classification and management have been introduced, in addition to the development of endocrine and anti-HER2 targeted therapies. Currently, efforts are being made to delineate the best approach for the genomic landscape of MBC and, as result, molecular therapeutic targets. Here, we highlight the recent developments in the cytopathology of MBC, discussing cytological diagnostic approaches in the characterization of hallmarks, such as immunocytochemistry and genomic biomarkers. Cytological material can be processed for ancillary testing for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Reassessment of receptor status is indicated due to changes in tumor biology and metastatic presentation. PD-L1 expression is the only approved biomarker for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor response in metastatic TNBC, evaluated by immunostaining. The feasibility of applying PD-L1 assays in MBC cytological samples can be recommended, with the adoption of a combined positive score. Non-formalin cytological samples provide higher purity, cellular yield, and better tumor fraction for single-multi gene assays. In MBC, molecular tests enable personalized therapy such as PIK3CA, NTRK fusion genes, and MSI. Cytopathology combined with molecular analysis must be performed effectively in routine clinical practice, through procedure standardization and experience dissemination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cytopathology of Metastatic Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2916 KiB  
Article
Reassessment of Reliability and Reproducibility for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtyping
by Xinjian Yu, Yongjing Liu and Ming Chen
Cancers 2022, 14(11), 2571; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112571 - 24 May 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3545
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with diverse, often poor prognoses and treatment responses. In order to identify targetable biomarkers and guide personalized care, scientists have developed multiple molecular classification systems for TNBC based on transcriptomic profiling. However, there is no [...] Read more.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with diverse, often poor prognoses and treatment responses. In order to identify targetable biomarkers and guide personalized care, scientists have developed multiple molecular classification systems for TNBC based on transcriptomic profiling. However, there is no consensus on the molecular subtypes of TNBC, likely due to discrepancies in technical and computational methods used by different research groups. Here, we reassessed the major steps for TNBC subtyping, validated the reproducibility of established TNBC subtypes, and identified two more subtypes with a larger sample size. By comparing results from different workflows, we demonstrated the limitations of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, as well as batch effect removal across microarray platforms. We also refined the usage of computational tools for TNBC subtyping. Furthermore, we integrated high-quality multi-institutional TNBC datasets (discovery set: n = 457; validation set: n = 165). Performing unsupervised clustering on the discovery and validation sets independently, we validated four previously discovered subtypes: luminal androgen receptor, mesenchymal, immunomodulatory, and basal-like immunosuppressed. Additionally, we identified two potential intermediate states of TNBC tumors based on their resemblance with more than one well-characterized subtype. In summary, we addressed the issues and limitations of previous TNBC subtyping through comprehensive analyses. Our results promote the rational design of future subtyping studies and provide new insights into TNBC patient stratification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2952 KiB  
Article
Molecular Classification Models for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Machine Learning
by Rassanee Bissanum, Sitthichok Chaichulee, Rawikant Kamolphiwong, Raphatphorn Navakanitworakul and Kanyanatt Kanokwiroon
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(9), 881; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090881 - 1 Sep 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4773
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks well-defined molecular targets and is highly heterogenous, making treatment challenging. Using gene expression analysis, TNBC has been classified into four different subtypes: basal-like immune-activated (BLIA), basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), mesenchymal (MES), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR). However, there [...] Read more.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks well-defined molecular targets and is highly heterogenous, making treatment challenging. Using gene expression analysis, TNBC has been classified into four different subtypes: basal-like immune-activated (BLIA), basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), mesenchymal (MES), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR). However, there is currently no standardized method for classifying TNBC subtypes. We attempted to define a gene signature for each subtype, and to develop a classification method based on machine learning (ML) for TNBC subtyping. In these experiments, gene expression microarray data for TNBC patients were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes unique to 198 known TNBC cases were identified and selected as a training gene set to train in seven different classification models. We produced a training set consisting of 719 DEGs selected from uniquely expressed genes of all four subtypes. The highest average accuracy of classification of the BLIA, BLIS, MES, and LAR subtypes was achieved by the SVM algorithm (accuracy 95–98.8%; AUC 0.99–1.00). For model validation, we used 334 samples of unknown TNBC subtypes, of which 97 (29.04%), 73 (21.86%), 39 (11.68%) and 59 (17.66%) were predicted to be BLIA, BLIS, MES, and LAR, respectively. However, 66 TNBC samples (19.76%) could not be assigned to any subtype. These samples contained only three upregulated genes (EN1, PROM1, and CCL2). Each TNBC subtype had a unique gene expression pattern, which was confirmed by identification of DEGs and pathway analysis. These results indicated that our training gene set was suitable for development of classification models, and that the SVM algorithm could classify TNBC into four unique subtypes. Accurate and consistent classification of the TNBC subtypes is essential for personalized treatment and prognosis of TNBC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Bioinformatics in Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1234 KiB  
Review
Tumor Microenvironment: Key Players in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Immunomodulation
by Hongmei Zheng, Sumit Siddharth, Sheetal Parida, Xinhong Wu and Dipali Sharma
Cancers 2021, 13(13), 3357; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133357 - 4 Jul 2021
Cited by 57 | Viewed by 7337
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and is highly related to immunomodulation. As we know, the most effective approach to treat TNBC so far is still chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death, release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and [...] Read more.
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and is highly related to immunomodulation. As we know, the most effective approach to treat TNBC so far is still chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death, release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling; therefore, it will be interesting to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced TME changes and TNBC immunomodulation. In this review, we focus on the immunosuppressive and immunoreactive role of TME in TNBC immunomodulation and the contribution of TME constituents to TNBC subtype classification. Further, we also discuss the role of chemotherapy-induced TME remodeling in modulating TNBC immune response and tumor progression with emphasis on DAMPs-associated molecules including high mobility group box1 (HMGB1), exosomes, and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), which may provide us with new clues to explore effective combined treatment options for TNBC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 12838 KiB  
Article
CD44 Targeted Nanomaterials for Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
by Ghazal Nabil, Rami Alzhrani, Hashem O. Alsaab, Mohammed Atef, Samaresh Sau, Arun K. Iyer and Hossny El Banna
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040898 - 20 Feb 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 4789
Abstract
Identified as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among American women after lung cancer, breast cancer of all types has been the focus of numerous research studies. Even though triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15–20% of the number of breast cancer cases [...] Read more.
Identified as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among American women after lung cancer, breast cancer of all types has been the focus of numerous research studies. Even though triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15–20% of the number of breast cancer cases worldwide, its existing therapeutic options are fairly limited. Due to the pivotal role of the presence/absence of specific receptors to luminal A, luminal B, HER-2+, and TNBC in the molecular classification of breast cancer, the lack of these receptors has accounted for the aforementioned limitation. Thereupon, in an attempt to participate in the ongoing research endeavors to overcome such a limitation, the conducted study adopts a combination strategy as a therapeutic paradigm for TNBC, which has proven notable results with respect to both: improving patient outcomes and survivability rates. The study hinges upon an investigation of a promising NPs platform for CD44 mediated theranostic that can be combined with JAK/STAT inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC. The ability of momelotinib (MMB), which is a JAK/STAT inhibitor, to sensitize the TNBC to apoptosis inducer (CFM-4.16) has been evaluated in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. MMB + CFM-4.16 combination with a combination index (CI) ≤0.5, has been selected for in vitro and in vivo studies. MMB has been combined with CD44 directed polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) loaded with CFM-4.16, namely CD44-T-PNPs, which selectively delivered the payload to CD44 overexpressing TNBC with a significant decrease in cell viability associated with a high dose reduction index (DRI). The mechanism underlying their synergism is based on the simultaneous downregulation of P-STAT3 and the up-regulation of CARP-1, which has induced ROS-dependent apoptosis leading to caspase 3/7 elevation, cell shrinkage, DNA damage, and suppressed migration. CD44-T-PNPs showed a remarkable cellular internalization, demonstrated by uptake of a Rhodamine B dye in vitro and S0456 (NIR dye) in vivo. S0456 was conjugated to PNPs to form CD44-T-PNPs/S0456 that simultaneously delivered CFM-4.16 and S0456 parenterally with selective tumor targeting, prolonged circulation, minimized off-target distribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Cancer Nanomedicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1503 KiB  
Review
Modulatory Role of microRNAs in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Basal-Like Phenotype
by Andrea Angius, Paolo Cossu-Rocca, Caterina Arru, Maria Rosaria Muroni, Vincenzo Rallo, Ciriaco Carru, Paolo Uva, Giovanna Pira, Sandra Orrù and Maria Rosaria De Miglio
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3298; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113298 - 7 Nov 2020
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 5512
Abstract
Development of new research, classification, and therapeutic options are urgently required due to the fact that TNBC is a heterogeneous malignancy. The expression of high molecular weight cytokeratins identifies a biologically and clinically distinct subgroup of TNBCs with a basal-like phenotype, representing about [...] Read more.
Development of new research, classification, and therapeutic options are urgently required due to the fact that TNBC is a heterogeneous malignancy. The expression of high molecular weight cytokeratins identifies a biologically and clinically distinct subgroup of TNBCs with a basal-like phenotype, representing about 75% of TNBCs, while the remaining 25% includes all other intrinsic subtypes. The triple negative phenotype in basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) makes it unresponsive to endocrine therapy, i.e., tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and/or anti-HER2-targeted therapies; for this reason, only chemotherapy can be considered an approach available for systemic treatment even if it shows poor prognosis. Therefore, treatment for these subgroups of patients is a strong challenge for oncologists due to disease heterogeneity and the absence of unambiguous molecular targets. Dysregulation of the cellular miRNAome has been related to huge cellular process deregulations underlying human malignancy. Consequently, epigenetics is a field of great promise in cancer research. Increasing evidence suggests that specific miRNA clusters/signatures might be of clinical utility in TNBCs with basal-like phenotype. The epigenetic mechanisms behind tumorigenesis enable progress in the treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of cancer. This review intends to summarize the epigenetic findings related to miRNAome in TNBCs with basal-like phenotype. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Regulatory and Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Epigenetic Mechanisms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 2251 KiB  
Review
Drug Repurposing for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
by Marta Ávalos-Moreno, Araceli López-Tejada, Jose L. Blaya-Cánovas, Francisca E. Cara-Lupiañez, Adrián González-González, Jose A. Lorente, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira and Sergio Granados-Principal
J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10(4), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040200 - 29 Oct 2020
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 9127
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer which presents a high rate of relapse, metastasis, and mortality. Nowadays, the absence of approved specific targeted therapies to eradicate TNBC remains one of the main challenges in clinical practice. Drug [...] Read more.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer which presents a high rate of relapse, metastasis, and mortality. Nowadays, the absence of approved specific targeted therapies to eradicate TNBC remains one of the main challenges in clinical practice. Drug discovery is a long and costly process that can be dramatically improved by drug repurposing, which identifies new uses for existing drugs, both approved and investigational. Drug repositioning benefits from improvements in computational methods related to chemoinformatics, genomics, and systems biology. To the best of our knowledge, we propose a novel and inclusive classification of those approaches whereby drug repurposing can be achieved in silico: structure-based, transcriptional signatures-based, biological networks-based, and data-mining-based drug repositioning. This review specially emphasizes the most relevant research, both at preclinical and clinical settings, aimed at repurposing pre-existing drugs to treat TNBC on the basis of molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways such as androgen receptor, adrenergic receptor, STAT3, nitric oxide synthase, or AXL. Finally, because of the ability and relevance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) to drive tumor aggressiveness and poor clinical outcome, we also focus on those molecules repurposed to specifically target this cell population to tackle recurrence and metastases associated with the progression of TNBC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Cancer Systems Biology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 638 KiB  
Review
miRNA Expression Profiles in Luminal A Breast Cancer—Implications in Biology, Prognosis, and Prediction of Response to Hormonal Treatment
by Erik Kudela, Marek Samec, Lenka Koklesova, Alena Liskova, Peter Kubatka, Erik Kozubik, Tomas Rokos, Terezia Pribulova, Eva Gabonova, Marek Smolar and Kamil Biringer
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7691; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207691 - 17 Oct 2020
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 5511
Abstract
Breast cancer, which is the most common malignancy in women, does not form a uniform nosological unit but represents a group of malignant diseases with specific clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics. The increasing knowledge of the complex pathophysiological web of processes connected with [...] Read more.
Breast cancer, which is the most common malignancy in women, does not form a uniform nosological unit but represents a group of malignant diseases with specific clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics. The increasing knowledge of the complex pathophysiological web of processes connected with breast cancercarcinogenesis allows the development of predictive and prognostic gene expressionand molecular classification systems with improved risk assessment, which could be used for individualized treatment. In our review article, we present the up-to-date knowledge about the role of miRNAs and their prognostic and predictive value in luminal A breast cancer. Indeed, an altered expression profile of miRNAs can distinguish not only between cancer and healthy samples, but they can classify specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer including HER2, Luminal A, Luminal B, and TNBC. Early identification and classification of breast cancer subtypes using miRNA expression profilescharacterize a promising approach in the field of personalized medicine. A detection of sensitive and specific biomarkers to distinguish between healthy and early breast cancer patients can be achieved by an evaluation of the different expression of several miRNAs. Consequently, miRNAs represent a potential as good diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic biomarkers for patients with luminal A in the early stage of BC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2515 KiB  
Article
Unraveling the Genomic-Epigenomic Interaction Landscape in Triple Negative and Non-Triple Negative Breast Cancer
by Jiande Wu, Tarun Karthik Kumar Mamidi, Lu Zhang and Chindo Hicks
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1559; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061559 - 12 Jun 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3702
Abstract
Background: The recent surge of next generation sequencing of breast cancer genomes has enabled development of comprehensive catalogues of somatic mutations and expanded the molecular classification of subtypes of breast cancer. However, somatic mutations and gene expression data have not been leveraged [...] Read more.
Background: The recent surge of next generation sequencing of breast cancer genomes has enabled development of comprehensive catalogues of somatic mutations and expanded the molecular classification of subtypes of breast cancer. However, somatic mutations and gene expression data have not been leveraged and integrated with epigenomic data to unravel the genomic-epigenomic interaction landscape of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple negative breast cancer (non-TNBC). Methods: We performed integrative data analysis combining somatic mutation, epigenomic and gene expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to unravel the possible oncogenic interactions between genomic and epigenomic variation in TNBC and non-TNBC. We hypothesized that within breast cancers, there are differences in somatic mutation, DNA methylation and gene expression signatures between TNBC and non-TNBC. We further hypothesized that genomic and epigenomic alterations affect gene regulatory networks and signaling pathways driving the two types of breast cancer. Results: The investigation revealed somatic mutated, epigenomic and gene expression signatures unique to TNBC and non-TNBC and signatures distinguishing the two types of breast cancer. In addition, the investigation revealed molecular networks and signaling pathways enriched for somatic mutations and epigenomic changes unique to each type of breast cancer. The most significant pathways for TNBC were: retinal biosynthesis, BAG2, LXR/RXR, EIF2 and P2Y purigenic receptor signaling pathways. The most significant pathways for non-TNBC were: UVB-induced MAPK, PCP, Apelin endothelial, Endoplasmatic reticulum stress and mechanisms of viral exit from host signaling Pathways. Conclusion: The investigation revealed integrated genomic, epigenomic and gene expression signatures and signing pathways unique to TNBC and non-TNBC, and a gene signature distinguishing the two types of breast cancer. The study demonstrates that integrative analysis of multi-omics data is a powerful approach for unravelling the genomic-epigenomic interaction landscape in TNBC and non-TNBC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop