Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Sargan test

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1182 KB  
Article
Contributions to Risk Assessment with Edgeworth–Sargan Density Expansions (I): Stability Testing
by Ignacio Mauleón
Mathematics 2022, 10(7), 1074; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071074 - 27 Mar 2022
Viewed by 1634
Abstract
This paper analytically derives a stability test for the probability distribution of a random variable that follows the Edgeworth–Sargan density, also called Gram–Charlier. The distribution of the test is a weighted sum of Chi-squared densities of increasing degrees of freedom, starting with the [...] Read more.
This paper analytically derives a stability test for the probability distribution of a random variable that follows the Edgeworth–Sargan density, also called Gram–Charlier. The distribution of the test is a weighted sum of Chi-squared densities of increasing degrees of freedom, starting with the standard equivalent Chi-squared under the same conditions. The weights turn out to be linear combinations of the parameters of the distribution and the moments of a Gaussian density, and can be computed exactly. This is a convenient result, since then the probability intervals can be easily calculated from existing Chi-squared distribution tables. The test is applied to assess the weekly solar irradiance data stability for a twelve-year period. It shows that the density is acceptably stable overall, except for some eventual and localised dates. It is also shown that the usual probability intervals implemented in stability testing are larger than those of the equivalent Chi-squared distribution under comparable conditions. This implies that the common upper tail interval values for rejecting the null stability hypothesis are larger. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 376 KB  
Article
The Determinants of Sovereign Risk Premium in African Countries
by Jane Mpapalika and Christopher Malikane
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2019, 12(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010029 - 9 Feb 2019
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 7103
Abstract
This paper investigates the determinants of the sovereign risk premium in African countries. We employ the dynamic fixed effects model to determine the key drivers of sovereign bond spreads. Country-specific effects are fixed and the inclusion of dummy variables using the Bai–Perron multiple [...] Read more.
This paper investigates the determinants of the sovereign risk premium in African countries. We employ the dynamic fixed effects model to determine the key drivers of sovereign bond spreads. Country-specific effects are fixed and the inclusion of dummy variables using the Bai–Perron multiple structural break test is significant at a 5% level. For robustness, the time-series generalized method of moments (GMM) is used where the null hypothesis of the Sargan Test of over-identifying restrictions (OIR) and the Arellano–Bond Test of no autocorrelation are not rejected. This implies that the instruments used are valid and relevant. In addition, there is no autocorrelation in the error terms. Our results show that the exchange rate, Money supply/GDP (M2/GDP) ratio, and trade are insignificant. Furthermore, our findings indicate that public debt/GDP ratio, GDP growth, inflation rate, foreign exchange reserves, commodity price, and market sentiment are significant at a 5% and 10% level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Analysis and Portfolio Modelling)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

54 pages, 1134 KB  
Article
Accuracy and Efficiency of Various GMM Inference Techniques in Dynamic Micro Panel Data Models
by Jan Kiviet, Milan Pleus and Rutger Poldermans
Econometrics 2017, 5(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics5010014 - 20 Mar 2017
Cited by 54 | Viewed by 14126
Abstract
Studies employing Arellano-Bond and Blundell-Bond generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation for linear dynamic panel data models are growing exponentially in number. However, for researchers it is hard to make a reasoned choice between many different possible implementations of these estimators and associated [...] Read more.
Studies employing Arellano-Bond and Blundell-Bond generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation for linear dynamic panel data models are growing exponentially in number. However, for researchers it is hard to make a reasoned choice between many different possible implementations of these estimators and associated tests. By simulation, the effects are examined in terms of many options regarding: (i) reducing, extending or modifying the set of instruments; (ii) specifying the weighting matrix in relation to the type of heteroskedasticity; (iii) using (robustified) 1-step or (corrected) 2-step variance estimators; (iv) employing 1-step or 2-step residuals in Sargan-Hansen overall or incremental overidentification restrictions tests. This is all done for models in which some regressors may be either strictly exogenous, predetermined or endogenous. Surprisingly, particular asymptotically optimal and relatively robust weighting matrices are found to be superior in finite samples to ostensibly more appropriate versions. Most of the variants of tests for overidentification and coefficient restrictions show serious deficiencies. The variance of the individual effects is shown to be a major determinant of the poor quality of most asymptotic approximations; therefore, the accurate estimation of this nuisance parameter is investigated. A modification of GMM is found to have some potential when the cross-sectional heteroskedasticity is pronounced and the time-series dimension of the sample is not too small. Finally, all techniques are employed to actual data and lead to insights which differ considerably from those published earlier. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Panel Data Methods)
13 pages, 763 KB  
Article
Subset-Continuous-Updating GMM Estimators for Dynamic Panel Data Models
by Richard A. Ashley and Xiaojin Sun
Econometrics 2016, 4(4), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics4040047 - 30 Nov 2016
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7792
Abstract
The two-step GMM estimators of Arellano and Bond (1991) and Blundell and Bond (1998) for dynamic panel data models have been widely used in empirical work; however, neither of them performs well in small samples with weak instruments. The continuous-updating GMM estimator proposed [...] Read more.
The two-step GMM estimators of Arellano and Bond (1991) and Blundell and Bond (1998) for dynamic panel data models have been widely used in empirical work; however, neither of them performs well in small samples with weak instruments. The continuous-updating GMM estimator proposed by Hansen, Heaton, and Yaron (1996) is in principle able to reduce the small-sample bias, but it involves high-dimensional optimizations when the number of regressors is large. This paper proposes a computationally feasible variation on these standard two-step GMM estimators by applying the idea of continuous-updating to the autoregressive parameter only, given the fact that the absolute value of the autoregressive parameter is less than unity as a necessary requirement for the data-generating process to be stationary. We show that our subset-continuous-updating method does not alter the asymptotic distribution of the two-step GMM estimators, and it therefore retains consistency. Our simulation results indicate that the subset-continuous-updating GMM estimators outperform their standard two-step counterparts in finite samples in terms of the estimation accuracy on the autoregressive parameter and the size of the Sargan-Hansen test. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Panel Data Methods)
39 pages, 580 KB  
Article
Bootstrap Tests for Overidentification in Linear Regression Models
by Russell Davidson and James G. MacKinnon
Econometrics 2015, 3(4), 825-863; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics3040825 - 9 Dec 2015
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 7623
Abstract
We study the finite-sample properties of tests for overidentifying restrictions in linear regression models with a single endogenous regressor and weak instruments. Under the assumption of Gaussian disturbances, we derive expressions for a variety of test statistics as functions of eight mutually independent [...] Read more.
We study the finite-sample properties of tests for overidentifying restrictions in linear regression models with a single endogenous regressor and weak instruments. Under the assumption of Gaussian disturbances, we derive expressions for a variety of test statistics as functions of eight mutually independent random variables and two nuisance parameters. The distributions of the statistics are shown to have an ill-defined limit as the parameter that determines the strength of the instruments tends to zero and as the correlation between the disturbances of the structural and reduced-form equations tends to plus or minus one. This makes it impossible to perform reliable inference near the point at which the limit is ill-defined. Several bootstrap procedures are proposed. They alleviate the problem and allow reliable inference when the instruments are not too weak. We also study their power properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments of Specification Testing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop