Search Results (2)

Background: ERAS^® (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) is an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach focusing on optimizing outcomes after surgery through structured clinical pathways. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM/PREM), which are not routinely assessed after liver surgery within an ERAS^® protocol. Methods: Routine outcome parameters were extracted from clinical documentation. Using qualitative content analysis, PROM and PREM were retrospectively identified in 13 case records. In a prospective survey of 10 participants, PROM was assessed at three timepoints using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. PREM were collected at discharge. Results: The following PROM categories occurred in the retrospective content analysis: appetite (84.6%), pain/discomfort (76.9%), mobility (69.2%), wound condition (69.2%), and weight (61.5%). The categories of continuity of care (92.0%) and information, communication, education (69.0%) emerged as PREM. Descriptive changes in health state were shown for all EQ-5D-5L dimensions and timepoints. At discharge, mobility, selfcare, usual activities, and pain/discomfort tended to be worse, whereas anxiety/depression decreased gradually from preoperatively to the 4 week follow-up. There was high satisfaction with interprofessional care services and experienced cooperation between professionals. Conclusions: PROM and PREM are helpful to incorporate patients’ perspectives after liver surgery within an ERAS^® pathway and should be collected routinely in clinical practice. Full article

Benchmarking is crucial for healthcare providers to enhance quality and efficiency, notably for complex conditions like sarcomas. Multidisciplinary teams/sarcoma boards (MDT/SBs) are vital in sarcoma management, but differences in their processes can affect patient outcomes and treatment costs, despite adherence to international guidelines. To address this issue, this study aimed to compare two MDT/SBs and establish an interoperable digital platform, Sarconnector^®, for real-time-world data assessment and automated analysis. The study included 983 patients, 46.0% of whom female, with a median age of 58 years, and 4.5% of patients presented with metastasis at diagnosis. Differences were observed in the number of first-time presentations, follow-up presentations, primary sarcomas, biopsies and chemotherapy indications between the two MDT/SB. The results highlight the importance of benchmarking and utilizing a harmonized data approach, such as the RWT approach provided by the Sarconnector^®, to standardize and evaluate quality and cost metrics. By identifying areas of improvement and making data-driven decisions on the meta-level, healthcare providers can optimize resources and improve patient outcomes. In conclusion, benchmarking with the RWT harmonized data approach provided by the Sarconnector^® can help healthcare providers improve the overall effectiveness of the healthcare system and achieve better outcomes for their patients in terms of both outcomes and costs. Full article