Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Mehran classification

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
1474 KB  
Article
Red Cell Distribution Width–Standard Deviation and the Severity of In-Stent Restenosis: Associations with Angiographic Stenosis Burden and Mehran Classification
by Mert Deniz Savcilioglu, Kemal Ozan Lule, Osman Buyukcelebi and Ertan Vuruskan
Medicina 2026, 62(7), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62071358 (registering DOI) - 14 Jul 2026
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Red cell distribution width–standard deviation (RDW-SD) has been associated with systemic inflammation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its relationship with the angiographic severity and morphological complexity of drug-eluting stent-in-stent restenosis (ISR) has not been systematically characterized. The present study [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Red cell distribution width–standard deviation (RDW-SD) has been associated with systemic inflammation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its relationship with the angiographic severity and morphological complexity of drug-eluting stent-in-stent restenosis (ISR) has not been systematically characterized. The present study investigated whether RDW-SD is associated with angiographic restenosis severity and restenotic lesion complexity, and compared its performance with the platelet distribution width (PDW), Metabolic Stress Index (MSI), and Platelet-to-HDL Ratio (PHR). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, 290 patients undergoing clinically indicated repeat coronary angiography following prior drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation were enrolled. Angiographic luminal narrowing was quantified by QCA and categorized as reference (<50% in-stent luminal narrowing; n = 111), intermediate ISR (50–69%; n = 76), and severe ISR (≥70%; n = 103). The Mehran classification was applied to patients with ISR ≥50% and dichotomized as Mehran class I–II (n = 91) vs. Mehran class III–IV (n = 70). Multivariable logistic regression, hierarchical modeling, and incremental discrimination analyses (IDI and NRI) were performed for both binary outcomes. Results: RDW-SD differed significantly across angiographic severity groups (Kruskal–Wallis H = 51.14, p < 0.001), being highest in the ISR ≥70% group [44.6 fL (IQR 43.8–45.3)] and lowest in the ISR 50–69% group [43.2 fL (42.7–43.7)]. A parallel pattern was observed across Mehran class (H = 50.57, p < 0.001; Mehran class III–IV: 44.9 fL [44.2–45.8]). In multivariable analysis, RDW-SD independently associated with ISR ≥70% (OR = 1.228 per 0.5 fL, 95% CI 1.122–1.344, p < 0.001) and Mehran class III–IV (OR = 1.274, 95% CI 1.155–1.406, p < 0.001). Hierarchical modeling showed that adding RDW-SD improved the AUC from 0.603 to 0.719 for ISR ≥ 70% and from 0.592 to 0.757 for Mehran class III–IV (LRT p < 0.001 for both), with incrementally larger IDI and NRI gains for the Mehran class III–IV outcome. PDW did not retain significance after adjustment; MSI and PHR were not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusions: RDW-SD was independently associated with both angiographic ISR severity and Mehran morphological complexity in patients with established drug-eluting stent restenosis, with numerically greater model discrimination for the Mehran class III–IV endpoint. These findings suggest that RDW-SD may provide complementary information regarding restenosis burden and complexity in patients with established ISR. Prospective studies are required to validate these observations and determine their clinical relevance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3040 KB  
Review
Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review
by Handi Y. Salim, Awais Tahir, Wen Hui Teh, Mala Jheinga, Sherab Thaye and Lampson Fan
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(13), 5250; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135250 - 5 Jul 2026
Viewed by 303
Abstract
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major contributor to repeat revascularisation despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. Its persistence reflects a complex and heterogeneous interplay among mechanical, biological, and procedural factors, and understanding the dominant mechanism in each case is fundamental to [...] Read more.
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major contributor to repeat revascularisation despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. Its persistence reflects a complex and heterogeneous interplay among mechanical, biological, and procedural factors, and understanding the dominant mechanism in each case is fundamental to effective treatment selection. This narrative review provides a contemporary, mechanism-guided approach to the practical management of coronary ISR. We summarise the definition, incidence, and classification of ISR—including the Mehran, Waksman, and SCAI 2023 time-based frameworks—and outline patient-related, procedural, anatomical, and stent-related risk factors. The pathophysiology of neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis is discussed with reference to its clinical implications. Intracoronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) is central to ISR characterisation and treatment planning. Current international guidelines support imaging use in ISR management, though it is important to recognise that this recommendation is based largely on observational and surrogate-endpoint data rather than ISR-specific randomised trials demonstrating reductions in hard clinical outcomes, and practical barriers including cost, availability, and operator expertise must be acknowledged. Evidence-based treatment strategies—including drug-coated balloons (DCB), repeat DES implantation, lesion-modifying therapies, vascular brachytherapy, and coronary artery bypass grafting—are reviewed critically with reference to contemporary trial data and their specific clinical applicability. The choice between DCB and repeat DES is addressed with greater nuance, accounting for ISR type (BMS-ISR versus DES-ISR), lesion pattern, stent layering, and bleeding risk. Management considerations in complex subsets—chronic total occlusion ISR, left main ISR, saphenous vein graft ISR, and recurrent ISR—are also addressed. We propose a practical, substrate-driven management framework aligned with the 2024 ESC, 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI, and 2018 JCS/JSCVS guidelines. Future research priorities include ISR-specific randomised trials with hard clinical endpoints, prospective validation of imaging-guided treatment algorithms, head-to-head comparisons of DCB platforms, and investigation of pharmacological strategies targeting neoatherosclerosis progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Interventional Cardiology: From Access to Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 251 KB  
Article
Emergency CT Scans: Unveiling the Risks of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury
by Omay Sorgun, Rezan Karaali, Cüneyt Arıkan, Efe Kanter and Güner Yurtsever
Tomography 2024, 10(7), 1064-1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10070080 - 11 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2819
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for contrast-associated acute kidney injury nephropathy (CA-AKI) in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CCT) in the emergency department. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients aged 18 and older who [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for contrast-associated acute kidney injury nephropathy (CA-AKI) in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CCT) in the emergency department. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients aged 18 and older who visited the emergency department and underwent CCT between January and February 2022 were included. The Mehran score, calculated from patient data, was used to assess risk. CA-AKI development was determined by measuring serum creatinine (SCr) levels 48–72 h post-contrast administration. Results: The study included 532 patients, with a mean age of 57 ± 19 years; 53.2% were male. CA-AKI developed in 16% of cases, 5.82% required hemodialysis, and 7.9% died. The Mehran score was the only significant predictor of CA-AKI development. Patients with a Mehran score of 16 or higher had a 161-fold increased risk of developing CA-AKI compared to those with a score of 5 or lower. The model achieved a 91.3% correct classification rate. Logistic regression analysis showed that CA-AKI significantly increased mortality risk by 15.7 times. Conclusion: The Mehran score, originally developed for predicting CA-AKI risk post-coronary intervention, is also effective for predicting CA-AKI risk after CCT. While CA-AKI is a significant factor affecting mortality, it is not the sole cause of death (Nagelkerke R2 value 0.310). Full article
Back to TopTop