Search Results (5)

Natural gas stands out as a promising alternative fuel, and utilizing late intake valve close (LIVC) can further enhance its potential by improving internal combustion engine performance. The present study investigated the effect of LIVC on the performance of a Nissan Qashqai J10 four-cylinder internal combustion ignition engine (ICE) operating on gasoline (G) and natural gas (NG), with a focus on both energy and ecological aspects at stoichiometric points. Experimental tests were performed under the usual engine operating conditions, with engine speeds of 2000 and 3000 rpm and brake mean effective pressures (BMEPs) of 0.31, 0.55, and 0.79 MPa, while the intake valve closing moment was delayed at 24°, 31°, 38°, 45°, 52°, and 59° after bottom dead center (aBDC). The software AVL BOOST™ (version R2021.2) and its utility BURN were used to calculate the rate of heat release (ROHR), mass fraction burned (MFB), in-cylinder temperature, and the rate of temperature rise. The substitution of natural gas for gasoline substantially decreases CO₂ and NO_x emissions while enhancing the engine’s energy efficiency. Implementing a LIVC strategy can further boost brake thermal efficiency and reduce CO₂, though it negatively impacts CO, HC, and NO_x emissions. Optimal performance necessitates balancing efficiency improvements and CO₂ reduction against the control of other pollutants, potentially through combining LIVC with alternative engine control methodologies. Full article

An investigation into the lips-guided-flow combustion chamber (LGFC) and Miller cycle was conducted on a highly intensified diesel engine under rated power conditions to improve thermal efficiency. The radius and depth of the chamber bowl and lips were optimized to intensify the guided flow and fuel/air mixing. The experimental and simulated results show that the LGFC had a higher fuel/air mixture quality and quicker combustion rate, leading to a higher indicated power and higher thermal efficiency. A late intake valve closing (LIVC) Miller cycle with a higher expansion ratio of 11 and a lower compression ratio of 8.2 was used to control the energy distribution of the thermodynamic cycle and reduce the mechanical and thermal loads. The results show that the maximum combustion temperature was decreased by about 45 K and the thermal efficiency was improved by 2.1%. The research results are useful to guide the improvement in thermal efficiency through combustion chamber design and Miller cycle application for highly intensified diesel engines. Full article

Diesel engines play a very significant role in the automotive industry, but the total emissions of diesel engines are more than 1.8 times that of petrol engines. It is therefore important for diesel engines to control emissions. Theoretically, the Miller cycle can be used to achieve NOx reductions by changing the effective compression ratio, while it has become increasingly popular in recent years with the increasing maturity of current turbocharging technology. Based on Ricardo WAVE software, this paper analyses the NOx emissions and engine performance of diesel engines by modelling and simulating their operation under different loads with two types of Miller cycles (EIVC and LIVC) at different degrees. Simulation of engines operating under different loads allows a more comprehensive study of the effects of the Miller cycle on the engine, and a specific analysis in the context of the actual engine operating environment. The result is that both versions of the Miller cycle are most effective in reducing NOx emissions at 10% load, showing a maximum reduction of 21% for EIVC and 37% for LIVC. However, as the Miller cycle decreases engine power, the paper further investigates the application of turbocharger systems in the EIVC Miller cycle, with results showing a 32% increase in brake power at 10% load and −25% EIVC Miller cycle degree. Both ethanol-fueled diesel-cycle and Miller cycle engines were also analyzed, and a reduction in NOx emissions was observed, as well as hydrogen engine performance and NOx emissions. Full article

A one-dimensional (1D) simulation calculation model was created using GT-Power software to investigate the effect of an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) in concert with the Miller cycle on engine fuel economy and using a 1.5 T gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine as the source engine. The engine was tested under partial loading, full loading, and declared working conditions. The results show that under partial load, the Miller cycle could improve engine fuel economy by reducing pumping losses. In the low-speed 1000 r/min full load region, the Miller cycle had a significant effect on increasing the engine fuel economy. When the Miller intensity was −29 °CA, the fuel consumption decreased by a maximum of 10.5%. At medium speeds, 2000 r/min to 3600 r/min, the Miller cycle did not improve fuel economy significantly. For the Miller cycle with late intake valve closure (LIVC), when the EGR rate was about 7%, the fuel consumption was reduced by about 1.3% compared with the original engine at the same EGR rate. When opposed to the original engine without EGR, the fuel consumption was lowered by approximately 3.2 percent. Full article

Finite-time thermodynamic models for an Otto cycle, an Atkinson cycle, an over-expansion Miller cycle (M1), an LIVC Miller cycle through late intake valve closure (M2) and an LIVC Miller cycle with constant compression ratio (M3) have been established. The models for the two LIVC Miller cycles are first developed; and the heat-transfer and friction losses are considered with the effects of real engine parameters. A comparative analysis for the energy losses and performances has been conducted. The optimum compression-ratio ranges for the efficiency and effective power are different. The comparative results of cycle performances are influenced together by the ratios of the energy losses and the cycle types. The Atkinson cycle has the maximum peak power and efficiency, but the minimum power density; and the M1 cycle can achieve the optimum comprehensive performances. The less net fuel amount and the high peak cylinder pressure (M3 cycle) have a significantly adverse effect on the loss ratios of the heat-transfer and friction of the M2 and M3 cycles; and the effective power and energy efficiency are always lower than the M1 and Atkinson cycles. When greatly reducing the weights of the heat-transfer and friction, the M3 cycle has significant advantage in the energy efficiency. The results obtained can provide guidance for selecting the cycle type and optimizing the performances of a real engine. Full article