Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = LET-optimized pencil beam scanning proton therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 1153 KiB  
Case Report
Brachial Plexopathy in Head and Neck Cancer Potentially Related to LET-Dependent RBE
by Abanob Hanna, Anthony Casper, Roi Dagan, Hardev S. Grewal, Jiyeon Park, Eric D. Brooks, Erik Traneus, Lars Glimelius, Perry B. Johnson, Mohammad Saki, Yawei Zhang, Twyla R. Willoughby, Julie A. Bradley, Jackson Browne and Mark E. Artz
Biophysica 2025, 5(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica5020020 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 538
Abstract
Proton beam therapy for head and neck cancers traditionally employs a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1, which may underestimate actual biological effects in critical structures. This study evaluates how Linear Energy Transfer (LET) optimization could potentially prevent radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP). [...] Read more.
Proton beam therapy for head and neck cancers traditionally employs a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1, which may underestimate actual biological effects in critical structures. This study evaluates how Linear Energy Transfer (LET) optimization could potentially prevent radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP). (1) Case presentation: A 65-year-old male with stage IVA p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma received pencil-beam-scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy with concurrent cisplatin. Due to a right level 4 neck node, the high-risk target volume overlapped with the brachial plexus, resulting in a D0.1cc of 70.3 Gy (RBE = 1.1). Four years post-treatment, the patient developed progressive right upper extremity paresthesia, weakness, and dysesthesia. Electromyography revealed myokymia consistent with brachial plexopathy, while MRI showed hyperintensity of the right brachial plexus corresponding to the radiation field. Conservative treatment with pentoxifylline, gabapentin, and physical therapy improved his symptoms. (2) Methods: The original treatment plan was retrospectively analyzed using Monte Carlo dose algorithms and LET-dependent RBE models from McMahon and McNamara. An LET-optimized plan was created to limit LETd to 2.0 keV/µm in the brachial plexus. (3) Results: The relative biological equivalent (RBE) dose to 0.1cc of the brachial plexus was 77.8 Gy (CGE RBE), exceeding tolerance. The LET-optimized plan reduced the brachial plexus D0.1cc to 59.4 Gy (RBE = 1.1) and 63.2 Gy (CGE RBE), an 18.8% decrease, while maintaining target coverage. LETd, within the brachial plexus enhancement, decreased from 5.3 to 2.6 keV/μm. (4) Conclusion: This case highlights the potential clinical importance of LET optimization in proton therapy planning, particularly when organs-at-risk overlap with target volumes. By reducing LETd from 5.3 to 2.6 keV/μm and biological equivalent dose by 18.8%, LET optimization could potentially prevent late toxicities, like RIBP, while maintaining target coverage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6969 KiB  
Article
Potential Therapeutic Improvements in Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy with LETd Optimization and Disease-Specific RBE Models
by Michael Vieceli, Jiyeon Park, Wen Chien Hsi, Mo Saki, Nancy P. Mendenhall, Perry Johnson and Mark Artz
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 780; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040780 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2218
Abstract
Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of improving prostate cancer patient outcomes with PBS proton LETd optimization. Methods: SFO, IPT-SIB, and LET-optimized plans were created for 12 patients, and generalized-tissue and disease-specific LET-dependent RBE models were applied. The mean LETd in several [...] Read more.
Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of improving prostate cancer patient outcomes with PBS proton LETd optimization. Methods: SFO, IPT-SIB, and LET-optimized plans were created for 12 patients, and generalized-tissue and disease-specific LET-dependent RBE models were applied. The mean LETd in several structures was determined and used to calculate mean RBEs. LETd- and dose–volume histograms (LVHs/DVHs) are shown. TODRs were defined based on clinical dose goals and compared between plans. The impact of robust perturbations on LETd, TODRs, and DVH spread was evaluated. Results: LETd optimization achieved statistically significant increased target volume LETd of ~4 keV/µm compared to SFO and IPT-SIB LETd of ~2 keV/µm while mitigating OAR LETd increases. A disease-specific RBE model predicted target volume RBEs > 1.5 for LET-optimized plans, up to 18% higher than for SFO plans. LET-optimized target LVHs/DVHs showed a large increase not present in OARs. All RBE models showed a statistically significant increase in TODRs from SFO to IPT-SIB to LET-optimized plans. RBE = 1.1 does not accurately represent TODRs when using LETd optimization. Robust evaluations demonstrated a trade-off between increased mean target LETd and decreased DVH spread. Conclusion: The demonstration of improved TODRs provided via LETd optimization shows potential for improved patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Advance of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop