Search Results (2)

Pancreaticolithiasis represents a rare phenomenon, being superimposed most of the time on a form of chronic pancreatitis of multifactorial etiology. Pancreaticolithiasis is a late complication of the phenomenon of chronic pancreatitis. The reverberant inflammatory process, followed by the fibrotic degeneration of the pancreatic parenchyma, and pancreatic fluid stasis at the ductal level are factors that contribute to the phenomenon of calcium precipitation. This article describes the case of a patient with a diagnosis of pancreaticolithiasis (Wirsung duct lithiasis), a phenomenon superimposed on chronic pancreatitis of ethanolic cause (Rosemont classification). It was decided to perform surgery via the classical approach with the perfection of corporeo-caudal pancreatectomy and preservation of the splenic vessels (Kimura procedure) with pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis on the Roux-en-Y loop. The aim of this study is to identify the best method of treatment for pancreaticolithiasis. To enhance the case and provide a basis for standardization, a literature review was carried out, which included a total of six articles. The results of this study highlight that, currently, the management of symptomatic pancreaticolithiasis encompasses medical therapy (enzyme replacement therapy), interventional therapy (ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) ± ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), ERCP + sphincterotomy + stent insertion, and POP (oral pancreatoscopy)), and surgical treatment. In conclusion, based on the analysis conducted in this study, the size of the calculi present determines which is the suitable therapeutic care. Unlike stones over 0.5 cm, when surgery is explicitly advised for therapeutic purposes in the absence of endoscopic techniques, stones under 0.5 cm should be treated using endoscopic procedures. Full article

Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura’s technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery. Full article