Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = JECAM

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 3442 KiB  
Article
Advancing Crop Yield Predictions: AQUACROP Model Application in Poland’s JECAM Fields
by Ewa Panek-Chwastyk, Ceren Nisanur Ozbilge, Katarzyna Dąbrowska-Zielińska and Radosław Gurdak
Agronomy 2024, 14(4), 854; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040854 - 19 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2369
Abstract
This study, employing the AquaCrop model, demonstrated notable efficacy in assessing and predicting crop yields for winter wheat, maize, winter rapeseed, and sugar beets in the Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring (JECAM) test area of Poland from 2018 to 2023. In-situ [...] Read more.
This study, employing the AquaCrop model, demonstrated notable efficacy in assessing and predicting crop yields for winter wheat, maize, winter rapeseed, and sugar beets in the Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring (JECAM) test area of Poland from 2018 to 2023. In-situ measurements, conducted through field campaigns, included parameters such as electromagnetic radiation reflectance, Leaf Area Index (LAI), soil moisture, accumulated photosynthetically active radiation, chlorophyll content, and plant development phase. The model was calibrated with input data covering daily climatic parameters from the ERA5-land Daily Aggregated repository, crop details, and soil characteristics. Specifically, for winter wheat, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values ranged from 1.92% to 14.26% of the mean yield per hectare. Maize cultivation showed RMSE values ranging from 0.21% to 1.41% of the mean yield per hectare. Winter rapeseed exhibited RMSE values ranging from 0.58% to 17.15% of the mean yield per hectare. In the case of sugar beets, the RMSE values ranged from 0.40% to 1.65% of the mean yield per hectare. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)-based predictions showed higher accuracy for winter wheat, similar accuracy for maize and sugar beets, but lower accuracy for winter rapeseed compared to Leaf Area Index (LAI). The study contributes valuable insights into agricultural management practices and facilitates decision-making processes for farmers in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6009 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Phenological Developments on Interferometric and Polarimetric Crop Signatures Derived from Sentinel-1: Examples from the DEMMIN Study Site (Germany)
by Johannes Löw, Tobias Ullmann and Christopher Conrad
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(15), 2951; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152951 - 27 Jul 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3357
Abstract
This study explores the potential of Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to identify phenological phases of wheat, sugar beet, and canola. Breakpoint and extreme value analyses were applied to a dense time series of interferometric (InSAR) and polarimetric (PolSAR) features recorded during the [...] Read more.
This study explores the potential of Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to identify phenological phases of wheat, sugar beet, and canola. Breakpoint and extreme value analyses were applied to a dense time series of interferometric (InSAR) and polarimetric (PolSAR) features recorded during the growing season of 2017 at the JECAM site DEMMIN (Germany). The analyses of breakpoints and extrema allowed for the distinction of vegetative and reproductive stages for wheat and canola. Certain phenological stages, measured in situ using the BBCH-scale, such as leaf development and rosette growth of sugar beet or stem elongation and ripening of wheat, were detectable by a combination of InSAR coherence, polarimetric Alpha and Entropy, and backscatter (VV/VH). Except for some fringe cases, the temporal difference between in situ observations and breakpoints or extrema ranged from zero to five days. Backscatter produced the signature that generated the most breakpoints and extrema. However, certain micro stadia, such as leaf development of BBCH 10 of sugar beet or flowering BBCH 69 of wheat, were only identifiable by the InSAR coherence and Alpha. Hence, it is concluded that combining PolSAR and InSAR features increases the number of detectable phenological events in the phenological cycles of crops. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 19015 KiB  
Article
A Comparison between Support Vector Machine and Water Cloud Model for Estimating Crop Leaf Area Index
by Mehdi Hosseini, Heather McNairn, Scott Mitchell, Laura Dingle Robertson, Andrew Davidson, Nima Ahmadian, Avik Bhattacharya, Erik Borg, Christopher Conrad, Katarzyna Dabrowska-Zielinska, Diego de Abelleyra, Radoslaw Gurdak, Vineet Kumar, Nataliia Kussul, Dipankar Mandal, Y. S. Rao, Nicanor Saliendra, Andrii Shelestov, Daniel Spengler, Santiago R. Verón, Saeid Homayouni and Inbal Becker-Reshefadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(7), 1348; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071348 - 1 Apr 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 7735
Abstract
The water cloud model (WCM) can be inverted to estimate leaf area index (LAI) using the intensity of backscatter from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors. Published studies have demonstrated that the WCM can accurately estimate LAI if the model is effectively calibrated. However, [...] Read more.
The water cloud model (WCM) can be inverted to estimate leaf area index (LAI) using the intensity of backscatter from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors. Published studies have demonstrated that the WCM can accurately estimate LAI if the model is effectively calibrated. However, calibration of this model requires access to field measures of LAI as well as soil moisture. In contrast, machine learning (ML) algorithms can be trained to estimate LAI from satellite data, even if field moisture measures are not available. In this study, a support vector machine (SVM) was trained to estimate the LAI for corn, soybeans, rice, and wheat crops. These results were compared to LAI estimates from the WCM. To complete this comparison, in situ and satellite data were collected from seven Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring (JECAM) sites located in Argentina, Canada, Germany, India, Poland, Ukraine and the United States of America (U.S.A.). The models used C-Band backscatter intensity for two polarizations (like-polarization (VV) and cross-polarization (VH)) acquired by the RADARSAT-2 and Sentinel-1 SAR satellites. Both the WCM and SVM models performed well in estimating the LAI of corn. For the SVM, the correlation (R) between estimated LAI for corn and LAI measured in situ was reported as 0.93, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.64 m2m2 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.51 m2m2. The WCM produced an R-value of 0.89, with only slightly higher errors (RMSE of 0.75 m2m2 and MAE of 0.61 m2m2) when estimating corn LAI. For rice, only the SVM model was tested, given the lack of soil moisture measures for this crop. In this case, both high correlations and low errors were observed in estimating the LAI of rice using SVM (R of 0.96, RMSE of 0.41 m2m2 and MAE of 0.30 m2m2). However, the results demonstrated that when the calibration points were limited (in this case for soybeans), the WCM outperformed the SVM model. This study demonstrates the importance of testing different modeling approaches over diverse agro-ecosystems to increase confidence in model performance. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 6457 KiB  
Article
Comparison between Dense L-Band and C-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Time Series for Crop Area Mapping over a NISAR Calibration-Validation Site
by Simon Kraatz, Nathan Torbick, Xianfeng Jiao, Xiaodong Huang, Laura Dingle Robertson, Andrew Davidson, Heather McNairn, Michael H. Cosh and Paul Siqueira
Agronomy 2021, 11(2), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020273 - 1 Feb 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4875
Abstract
Crop area mapping is important for tracking agricultural production and supporting food security. Spaceborne approaches using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) now allow for mapping crop area at moderate spatial and temporal resolutions. Multi-frequency SAR data is highly useful for crop monitoring because backscatter [...] Read more.
Crop area mapping is important for tracking agricultural production and supporting food security. Spaceborne approaches using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) now allow for mapping crop area at moderate spatial and temporal resolutions. Multi-frequency SAR data is highly useful for crop monitoring because backscatter response from vegetation canopies is wavelength dependent. This study evaluates the utility of C-band Sentinel-1B (Sentinel-1) and L-band ALOS-2 (PALSAR) data, collected during the 2019 growing season, for generating accurate active crop extent (crop vs. non-crop) classifications over an agricultural region in western Canada. Evaluations were performed against the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada satellite-based Annual Cropland Inventory (ACI), an open data product that maps land cover across the extent of Canada’s agricultural land. Classifications were performed using the temporal coefficient of variation (CV) approach, where an optimal crop/non-crop delineating CV threshold (CVthr) is selected according to Youden’s J-statistic. Results show that crop area mapping agreed better with the ACI when using Sentinel-1 data (83.5%) compared to PALSAR (73.2%). Analysis of performance by crop reveals that PALSAR’s poorer performance can be attributed to soybean, urban, grassland, and pasture ACI classes. This study also compared CV values to in situ wet biomass data for canola and soybeans, showing that crops with lower biomass (soybean) had correspondingly lower CV values. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 4225 KiB  
Technical Note
Building a Data Set over 12 Globally Distributed Sites to Support the Development of Agriculture Monitoring Applications with Sentinel-2
by Sophie Bontemps, Marcela Arias, Cosmin Cara, Gérard Dedieu, Eric Guzzonato, Olivier Hagolle, Jordi Inglada, Nicolas Matton, David Morin, Ramona Popescu, Thierry Rabaute, Mickael Savinaud, Guadalupe Sepulcre, Silvia Valero, Ijaz Ahmad, Agnès Bégué, Bingfang Wu, Diego De Abelleyra, Alhousseine Diarra, Stéphane Dupuy, Andrew French, Ibrar Ul Hassan Akhtar, Nataliia Kussul, Valentine Lebourgeois, Michel Le Page, Terrence Newby, Igor Savin, Santiago R. Verón, Benjamin Koetz and Pierre Defournyadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Remote Sens. 2015, 7(12), 16062-16090; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215815 - 2 Dec 2015
Cited by 60 | Viewed by 11733
Abstract
Developing better agricultural monitoring capabilities based on Earth Observation data is critical for strengthening food production information and market transparency. The Sentinel-2 mission has the optimal capacity for regional to global agriculture monitoring in terms of resolution (10–20 meter), revisit frequency (five days) [...] Read more.
Developing better agricultural monitoring capabilities based on Earth Observation data is critical for strengthening food production information and market transparency. The Sentinel-2 mission has the optimal capacity for regional to global agriculture monitoring in terms of resolution (10–20 meter), revisit frequency (five days) and coverage (global). In this context, the European Space Agency launched in 2014 the “Sentinel­2 for Agriculture” project, which aims to prepare the exploitation of Sentinel-2 data for agriculture monitoring through the development of open source processing chains for relevant products. The project generated an unprecedented data set, made of “Sentinel-2 like” time series and in situ data acquired in 2013 over 12 globally distributed sites. Earth Observation time series were mostly built on the SPOT4 (Take 5) data set, which was specifically designed to simulate Sentinel-2. They also included Landsat 8 and RapidEye imagery as complementary data sources. Images were pre-processed to Level 2A and the quality of the resulting time series was assessed. In situ data about cropland, crop type and biophysical variables were shared by site managers, most of them belonging to the “Joint Experiment for Crop Assessment and Monitoring” network. This data set allowed testing and comparing across sites the methodologies that will be at the core of the future “Sentinel­2 for Agriculture” system. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 5904 KiB  
Article
An Automated Method for Annual Cropland Mapping along the Season for Various Globally-Distributed Agrosystems Using High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Time Series
by Nicolas Matton, Guadalupe Sepulcre Canto, François Waldner, Silvia Valero, David Morin, Jordi Inglada, Marcela Arias, Sophie Bontemps, Benjamin Koetz and Pierre Defourny
Remote Sens. 2015, 7(10), 13208-13232; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71013208 - 6 Oct 2015
Cited by 139 | Viewed by 11549
Abstract
Cropland mapping relies heavily on field data for algorithm calibration, making it, in many cases, applicable only at the field campaign scale. While the recently launched Sentinel-2 satellite will be able to deliver time series over large regions, it will not really be [...] Read more.
Cropland mapping relies heavily on field data for algorithm calibration, making it, in many cases, applicable only at the field campaign scale. While the recently launched Sentinel-2 satellite will be able to deliver time series over large regions, it will not really be compatible with the current mapping approach or the available in situ data. This research introduces a generic methodology for mapping annual cropland along the season at high spatial resolution with the use of globally available baseline land cover and no need for field data. The methodology is based on cropland-specific temporal features, which are able to cope with the diversity of agricultural systems, prior information from which mislabeled pixels have been removed and a cost-effective classifier. Thanks to the JECAM network, eight sites across the world were selected for global cropland mapping benchmarking. Accurate cropland maps were produced at the end of the season, showing an overall accuracy of more than 85%. Early cropland maps were also obtained at three-month intervals after the beginning of the growing season, and these showed reasonable accuracy at the three-month stage (>70% overall accuracy) and progressive improvement along the season. The trimming-based method was found to be key for using spatially coarse baseline land cover information and, thus, avoiding costly field campaigns for prior information retrieval. The accuracy and timeliness of the proposed approach shows that it has substantial potential for operational agriculture monitoring programs. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop