Search Results (3)

Background: Research to identify changes in driving behavior that occur with the onset of Pre-MCI and MCI is an emerging area with many gaps still to be addressed. These gaps include limited use of objective, continuous measurement of driver behavior in real-life traffic conditions and comprehensive, biomarker-validated, cognitive evaluation based upon both testing and clinical ratings. Using these strategies, the questions addressed in this exploratory study are whether or not differences in driving behavior are indicative of Pre-MCI/MCI and which behaviors are most predictive of Pre-MCI/MCI. Methods: As part of a naturalistic longitudinal study, older drivers with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥ 19 had telematic sensors installed in their vehicles and underwent comprehensive cognitive assessment quarterly for three years. Thirty-six participants were classified as Unimpaired (n = 23) or Pre-MCI/MCI (n = 10/3) based upon a neuropsychological battery and diagnostic algorithm. A penalized generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with a logistic link and LASSO regularization was used to model Pre-MCI/MCI group membership vs. unimpaired as a function of ten trip-level telematic features (trip distance, hard acceleration, hard braking, hard turns, speed average, maximum speed, RPM average, fuel level, throttle average, and throttle variability) at the end of their first 12 months in the study. Results: Higher RPM, shorter average trips, and greater throttle variability predicted higher odds of Pre-MCI/MCI, while more frequent hard braking, hard turns, higher mean speed, and lower average throttle (steadier pedal control) predicted lower odds of Pre-MCI/MCI. Conclusions: The model clearly distinguished unimpaired older drivers from those with MCI or Pre-MCI, suggesting that distinct patterns of driver behavior may be related to levels of cognitive function. Full article

A third of large truck crashes are associated with driver-related factors, especially speeding. This study aimed to examine the impact of behavior-based safety (BBS) programs on speeding. Speeding data were examined from a trucking fleet that had incorporated a BBS program using in-vehicle data recorders (IVDR) and post hoc feedback. Speeding events were examined over 37 weeks in two stages—an initial 4-week period (Stage 1), and the final 30 weeks (Stage 2). In Stage 1, data were collected without any feedback. In Stage 2, a subset of the drivers received feedback. A cluster analysis was performed based on the speeding event rate from Stage 1. The analysis yielded two clusters per group based on risk. The higher-risk cluster contained fewer drivers and showed a greater reduction in speeding with the BBS program, compared to the lower-risk cluster. Both clusters showed significant decreases in speeding across Stage 2. The BBS program was associated with reduced speeding, with a more pronounced reduction for the higher-risk drivers, highlighting the role of BBS programs in trucking and underscoring the importance of driver sub-groups. Targeted safety approaches may be more efficient and yield higher safety benefits than a one-size fits all approach. Full article

This study examined the optimal sampling durations for in-vehicle data recorder (IVDR) data analysis, focusing on professional bus drivers. Vision-based technology (VBT) from Mobileye Inc. is an emerging technology for monitoring driver behavior and enhancing safety in advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs) and autonomous driving. VBT detects hazardous driving events by assessing distances to vehicles. This naturalistic study of 77 male bus drivers aimed to determine the optimal duration for monitoring professional bus driving patterns and the stabilization point in risky driving events over time using VBT and G-sensor-equipped buses. Of the initial cohort, 61 drivers’ VBT data and 66 drivers’ G-sensor data were suitable for analysis. Findings indicated that achieving a stable driving pattern required approximately 130 h of VBT data and 170 h of G-sensor data with an expected 10% error rate. Deviating downward from these durations led to higher error rates or unreliable data. The study found that VBT and G-sensor data are both valuable tools for driving assessment. Moreover, it underscored the effective application of VBT technology in driving behavior analysis as a way of assessing interventions and refining autonomous vehicle algorithms. These results provide practical recommendations for IVDR researchers, stressing the importance of adequate monitoring durations for reliable and accurate outcomes. Full article