Search Results (3)

Background/Objectives: There is a need for prediction models which enable weighing benefits against risks of different treatment strategies for individual Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Therefore, we aimed to predict absolute risk of progression, first relapse or death (PRD) with and without incorporating HL treatment. Methods: The prognostic and treatment information of 2343 patients treated for classical HL at ages 15–60 years between 2008 and 2018 in the Netherlands was used to predict absolute risk of PRD up to 5 years after diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models allowing for time-varying coefficients. Models were externally validated in 1675 patients treated for classical HL in Denmark between 2000 and 2018. Results: In early stages, gender, leukocyte, and lymphocyte counts were associated with risk of PRD. Additionally, receiving >4 cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or ABVD plus radiotherapy predicted lower risk of relapse compared with receiving ≤4 cycles of ABVD. In advanced stages, age, albumin and leukocyte counts predicted PRD risk. Receiving (escalated) BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) predicted lower PRD risk compared to ABVD. In Danish patients treated between 2008 and 2018, adding treatment information improved 5-year Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from 0.63 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.55–0.72) to 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63–0.79) in early stages (p-value = 0.04) and from 0.59 (95% CI: 0.52–0.65) to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55–0.68) in advanced stages (p-value = 0.33). Conclusions: We developed well calibrated models with reasonable discrimination, not only incorporating pre-treatment prognostic factors but also treatment effect enabling the prediction of absolute risk of first relapse/progression. Full article

Background: The COVID-GRAM is a clinical risk rating score for predicting the prognosis of hospitalized COVID-19 infected patients. Aim: Our study aimed to evaluate the use of the COVID-GRAM score in patients with COVID-19 based on the data from the COronavirus in the LOwer Silesia (COLOS) registry. Material and methods: The study group (834 patients of Caucasian patients) was retrospectively divided into three arms according to the risk achieved on the COVID-GRAM score calculated at the time of hospital admission (between February 2020 and July 2021): low, medium, and high risk. The Omnibus chi-square test, Fisher test, and Welch ANOVA were used in the statistical analysis. Post-hoc analysis for continuous variables was performed using Tukey’s correction with the Games–Howell test. Additionally, the ROC analysis was performed over time using inverse probability of censorship (IPCW) estimation. The GRAM-COVID score was estimated from the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). Results: Most patients (65%) had a low risk of complications on the COVID-GRAM scale. There were 113 patients in the high-risk group (13%). In the medium- and high-risk groups, comorbidities occurred statistically significantly more often, e.g., hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and flutter, heart failure, valvular disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), compared to low-risk tier subjects. These individuals were also patients with a higher incidence of neurological and cardiac complications in the past. Low saturation of oxygen values on admission, changes in C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, hyperglycemia, and procalcitonin level were associated with an increased risk of death during hospitalization. The troponin level was an independent mortality factor. A change from low to medium category reduced the overall survival probability by more than 8 times and from low to high by 25 times. The factor with the strongest impact on survival was the absence of other diseases. The medium-risk patient group was more likely to require dialysis during hospitalization. The need for antibiotics was more significant in the high-risk group on the GRAM score. Conclusion: The COVID-GRAM score corresponds well with total mortality. The factor with the strongest impact on survival was the absence of other diseases. The worst prognosis was for patients who were unconscious during admission. Patients with higher COVID-GRAM score were significantly less likely to return to full health during follow-up. There is a continuing need to develop reliable, easy-to-adopt tools for stratifying the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article

Patients with terminal cancers commonly receive aggressive and sub-optimal treatment near the end of life, which may not be beneficial in terms of duration or quality of life. To improve end-of-life care, it is essential to develop methods that can accurately predict the short-term risk of death. However, most prediction models for patients with cancer are static in the sense that they only use patient features at a fixed time. We proposed a dynamic prediction model (DPM) that can incorporate time-dependent predictors. We apply this method to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from a real-world database. Inverse probability of censoring weighted AUC with bootstrap inference was used to compare predictions among models. We found that increasing ECOG performance status and decreasing albumin had negative prognostic associations with overall survival (OS). Moreover, the negative prognostic implications strengthened over the patient disease course. DPMs using both time-independent and time-dependent predictors substantially improved short-term prediction accuracy compared to Cox models using only predictors at a fixed time. The proposed model can be broadly applied for prediction based on longitudinal data, including an estimation of the dynamic effects of time-dependent features on OS and updating predictions at any follow-up time. Full article