Search Results (32)

HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) presents a significant challenge to antiretroviral therapy (ART) success, particularly in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia. This cross-sectional study investigated viral suppression rates and resistance patterns among patients on second-line ART across 28 Ethiopian health facilities. Blood samples collected from 586 participants were analyzed to measure CD4 count and viral load and assess HIVDR in patients experiencing virological failure (VF) (viral load ≥ 1000 copies/mL). Demographic and clinical data were analyzed using logistic regression to identify factors associated with VF. Results showed that 13.82% of participants experienced VF, with 67.57% of genotyped samples exhibiting at least one drug resistance mutation. Resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs) was detected in 48.64%, 64.86%, and 18.92% of cases, respectively. Dual-class resistance was identified in 48.64% of patients, while triple-class resistance was detected in 18.92%. VF was more likely among students and those with CD4 counts below 200 cells/mm³, but less likely in patients on second-line treatment for 12 months or more. Our findings highlight a substantial HIVDR burden among patients on second-line ART with VF, emphasizing the need for comprehensive HIV care, including adherence support, regular viral load monitoring, and HIVDR testing. Full article

Real-world data on HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) after transitioning to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD) are limited. We assessed HIVDR rates and patterns in clients with virological failure (VF) after switching from an NNRTI-based regimen to TLD. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Gaza, Mozambique (August 2021–February 2022), including adults on first-line ART for ≥12 months who transitioned to TLD and had unsuppressed viral load (VL) ≥ 1000 copies/mL six months post-transition. After three adherence counseling sessions, participants with VF underwent genotyping for drug resistance mutations (DRMs) using the Stanford HIVdb Program. Of 717 participants (median age 39.2 years, 70.7% female), 217 (30.2%) had VF, 193 (88.9%) underwent genotyping, with 183 (94.8%) successfully genotyped. Intermediate–high dolutegravir (DTG) resistance was found in 19.6% (36/183). Unsuppressed VL before DTG transition was independently associated with VF (aOR: 2.14). Resistance patterns included 33.3% (12/36; 95% CI: 14.6–46.3) to all three TLD drugs, 55.6% (20/36; 95% CI: 39.3–71.9) to DTG and 3TC, and 11% (4/36; 95% CI: 0.8–21.3) to DTG only. Major drug resistance mutations to DTG included G118R (9.3%), R263K (6.6%), and Q148H/R/K (4.4%). This study highlights the need to consider virologic status before transitioning PLHIV to TLD and suggests that adherence counseling may not prevent resistance in those with unknown or prior VF. Full article

This systematic review assessed the prevalence of transmitted and acquired HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) and the associated risk factors in Mozambique. A search of the PubMed, Cochrane, B-On, and Scopus databases up to December 2023 was conducted and included 11 studies with 1118 HIV-1 pol sequences. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) to NNRTIs were found in 13% of the drug-naive individuals and 31% of those on ART, while NRTI resistance occurred in 5% and 10%, respectively. Dual-class resistance (NNRTI + NRTI) was detected in 2% of the drug-naive and 8% of ART-experienced individuals. DRMs to protease inhibitors (PIs) were found in 2% of the drug-naive and 5% of ART-experienced individuals. The rate of DRMs was significantly higher in Beira than in Maputo, as well as in pediatric patients than in adults and pregnant women. Subtype C predominated (94%) and was associated with lower viral loads and DRM rates as compared to the other subtypes. The high prevalence of DRMs, particularly to NNRTIs and NRTIs, highlights the need for ongoing surveillance and targeted interventions. These findings are critical for optimizing ART regimens and informing public health strategies in Mozambique, with particular attention to regions such as Beira and vulnerable populations such as pediatric patients. Full article

(1) Background: HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) poses a significant challenge to the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy and the overall management of HIVand AIDS. Understanding the predictors of HIVDR is critical for developing strategies to mitigate its impact. The objectives of this study were to identify the predictors of HIVDR among Zimbabwe Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (ZIMPHIA 2020) study participants, a national population-based survey. (2) Methods: Data from people living with HIV who participated in the ZIMPHIA 2020 were used to determine the predictors of HIVDR. (3) Results: The prevalence of HIVDR was 44.9%. Acquired HIVDR was present in 76.1% of people with a virological failure and transmitted resistance is 22.6% in naïve individuals. Factors associated with HIVDR in adjusted analysis were the number of lifetime sexual partners (aOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.06, p = 0.017), each additional year since the first HIV positive result (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09–1.25, p < 0.01), each additional year on ART (aOR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.23, p = 0.001), initiating ART before 2014 (aOR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.72–5.49, p = 0.020), ever had switched antiretrovirals (aOR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.15–5.29, p = 0.020) or had ever had a viral load test (aOR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.54–4.17, p < 0.001) and a CD4 count < 350 (aOR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.48–2.83, p < 0.01), while age ≥ 50 (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32–0.98, 32 p = 0.04), condom use at last encounter (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.33–0.73, p < 0.001), and not being on ART (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.06–0.13, p < 0.01) were associated with reduced odds of HIVDR. Conclusions: HIVDR was high among the participants. There is a need to address HIVDR and enhance the mechanisms already in place. This study introduces more information that would help in developing targeted interventions to prevent HIVDR and improve patient outcomes. Full article

HIV-1 drug resistance (HIVDR) impedes treatment and control of HIV-1, especially in high-prevalence settings such as KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province, South Africa. This study merged routine HIV-1 genotypic resistance test (GRT) data with Geographic Information Systems coordinates to assess patterns and geographic distribution of HIVDR in KZN, among ART-experienced adults with virological failure. We curated 3133 GRT records generated between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2022, which includes the early phase of dolutegravir (DTG) rollout, of which 2735 (87.30%) had HIVDR. Of the 2735, major protease, nucleoside, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations were detected in 41.24%, 84.97% and 88.08% of GRTs, respectively. Additional genotyping of HIV-1 integrase for 41/3133 (1.31%) GRTs showed that 17/41 (41.46%) had integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance. Notably, of 26 patients on DTG with integrase genotyping, 9 (34.62%) had DTG-associated resistance mutations. Dual- or triple-class resistance was observed in four of every five GRTs. The odds of HIVDR increased significantly with age, with ≥60 years having 5 times higher odds of HIVDR compared to 18–29 years (p = 0.001). We identified geospatial differences in the burden of HIVDR, providing proof of concept that this could be used for data-driven public health decision making. Ongoing real-time HIVDR surveillance is essential for evaluating the outcomes of the updated South African HIV treatment programme. Full article

Background: HIV drug resistance (HIV-DR) may jeopardize the benefit of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in treatment and prevention. This study utilized viral phylogenetics to resolve the influence of transmission networks on sustaining the spread of HIV-DR in Quebec spanning 2002 to 2022. Methods: Time trends in acquired (ADR) and transmitted drug resistance (TDR) were delineated in treatment-experienced (n = 3500) and ART-naïve persons (n = 6011) with subtype B infections. Similarly, non-B-subtype HIV-DR networks were assessed pre- (n = 1577) and post-ART experience (n = 488). Risks of acquisition of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were related to clustering using 1, 2–5, vs. 6+ members per cluster as categorical variables. Results: Despite steady declines in treatment failure and ADR since 2007, rates of TDR among newly infected, ART-naive persons remained at 14% spanning the 2007–2011, 2012–2016, and 2017–2022 periods. Notably, half of new infections among men having sex with men and heterosexual groups were linked in large, clustered networks having a median of 35 (14–73 IQR) and 16 (9–26 IQR) members per cluster, respectively. Cluster membership and size were implicated in forward transmission of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor NNRTI RAMs (9%) and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (5%). In contrast, transmission of M184V, K65R, and integrase inhibitors (1–2%) remained rare. Levels of TDR reflected viral replicative fitness. The median baseline viremia in ART-naïve groups having no RAMs, NNRTI RAMs, TAMs, and M184VI were 46.088, 38,447, 20,330, and 6811 copies/mL, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Phylogenetics emphasize the need to prioritize ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis strategies to avert the expansion of transmission cascades of HIV-DR. Full article

Background: The global scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) offers significant health benefits by suppressing HIV-1 replication and increasing CD4 cell counts. However, incomplete viral suppression poses a potential threat for the emergence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs), limiting ART options, and increasing HIV transmission. Objective: We investigated the patterns of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) among HIV-1 patients in Portugal. Methods: Data were obtained from 1050 HIV-1 patient samples submitted for HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing from January 2022 to June 2023. Evaluation of DRM affecting viral susceptibility to nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) was performed using an NGS technology, the Vela Diagnostics Sentosa SQ HIV-1 Genotyping Assay. Results: About 71% of patients were ART naïve and 29% were experienced. Overall, 20% presented with any DRM. The prevalence of TDR and ADR was 12.6% and 41.1%, respectively. M184V, T215S, and M41L mutations for NRTI, K103N for NNRTI, and M46I/L for PIs were frequent in naïve and treated patients. E138K and R263K mutations against INSTIs were more frequent in naïve than treated patients. TDR and ADR to INSTIs were 0.3% and 7%, respectively. Patients aged 50 or over (OR: 1.81, p = 0.015), originating from Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOPs) (OR: 1.55, p = 0.050), HIV-1 subtype G (OR: 1.78, p = 0.010), and with CD4 < 200 cells/mm³ (OR: 1.70, p = 0.043) were more likely to present with DRMs, while the males (OR: 0.63, p = 0.003) with a viral load between 4.1 to 5.0 Log₁₀ (OR: 0.55, p = 0.003) or greater than 5.0 Log₁₀ (OR: 0.52, p < 0.001), had lower chances of presenting with DRMs. Conclusions: We present the first evidence on TDR and ADR to INSTI regimens in followed up patients presenting for healthcare in Portugal. We observed low levels of TDR to INSTIs among ART-naïve and moderate levels in ART-exposed patients. Regimens containing PIs could be an alternative second line in patients with intermediate or high-level drug resistance, especially against second-generation INSTIs (dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir). Full article

Millions of Africans are on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), but few detailed descriptions of dolutegravir resistance and its clinical management exist. We reviewed HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing application forms submitted between June 2019 and October 2022, data from the national HIVDR database, and genotypic test results. We obtained standardized ART outcomes and virological results of cases with dolutegravir resistance, and explored associations with dolutegravir resistance among individuals with successful integrase sequencing. All cases were on two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)/dolutegravir, and had confirmed virological failure, generally with prolonged viremia. Among 89 samples with successful integrase sequencing, 24 showed dolutegravir resistance. Dolutegravir resistance-associated mutations included R263K (16/24), E138K (7/24), and G118R (6/24). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and the presence of high-level NRTI resistance were significantly associated with dolutegravir resistance. After treatment modification recommendations, four individuals (17%) with dolutegravir resistance died, one self-discontinued ART, one defaulted, and one transferred out. Of the 17 remaining individuals, 12 had follow-up VL results, and 11 (92%) were <1000 copies/mL. Twenty-four cases with dolutegravir resistance among 89 individuals with confirmed virological failure suggests a considerable prevalence in the Malawi HIV program. Successful management of dolutegravir resistance was possible, but early mortality was high. More research on the management of treatment-experienced individuals with dolutegravir resistance is needed. Full article

Dolutegravir (DTG) use in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine (TLD) is scaling up in Africa. However, HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) data to DTG remain scarce in Zimbabwe. We assessed the prevalence and genetic mechanisms of DTG resistance in people living with HIV initiating on TLD. A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2021 and April 2023 among antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve adults (≥18 years) attending care at an HIV clinic in Zimbabwe. Pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) was assessed prior to TLD initiation and viral load (VL) outcome and acquired drug resistance (ADR) to TLD were described after 24 weeks follow-up. In total, 172 participants were enrolled in the study. The median (IQR) age and log₁₀ VL were 39 (29–48) years and 5.41 (4.80–5.74) copies/mL, respectively. At baseline, no PDR to DTG was found. However, as previously reported, PDR to non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) was high (15%) whilst PDR to NRTI was low (4%). After a median duration of 27 (25–30) weeks on TLD, virological suppression (VL < 1000 copies/mL) was 98% and among the 2 participants with VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL, no ADR was found. HIVDR to DTG is rare among ART naïve individuals. DTG is more likely to address the problems of HIVDR in Africa. Full article

Background: High rates of disease progression and HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) among adults taking highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) in Sub-Saharan Africa were previously documented. However, children were generally not considered despite their greater risk. Hence, this study was aimed to evaluate HIV-1 disease progression and drug resistance mutation among children on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia. Method: A longitudinal study was conducted among 551 HIV-positive children (<15 years old) recruited between 2017 and 2019 at 40 antiretroviral treatment delivery sites in Ethiopia. Disease progression was retrospectively measured over a 12-year (2007–2019) follow-up as the progress towards immunosuppression. Two consecutive viral load (VL) tests were conducted in 6-month intervals to assess virologic failure (VF). For children with VF, HIV-1 genotyping and sequencing was performed for the pol gene region using in-house assay validated at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Stanford HIVDB v9.0 algorithm was used for identification of drug resistance mutations. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to estimate the rate and predictors of disease progression, respectively. Results: The disease progression rate was 6.3 per 100 person-years-observation (95% CI = 4.21–8.53). Overall immunosuppression (CD4 count < 200 cells/mm³) during the 12-year follow-up was 11.3% (95% CI = 7.5–15.1). Immunosuppression was significantly increased as of the mean duration of 10.5 (95% CI = 10.1–10.8) years (38.2%) to 67.8% at 12 years (p < 0.001). Overall, 14.5% had resistance to at least one drug, and 6.2% had multi-drug resistance. A resistance of 67.8% was observed among children with VF. Resistance to non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) drugs were 11.4% and 10.1%, respectively. Mutations responsible for NRTI resistance were M184V (30.1%), K65R (12.1%), and D67N (5.6%). Moreover, NNRTI-associated mutations were K103N (14.8%), Y181C (11.8%), and G190A (7.7%). Children who had a history of opportunistic infection [AHR (95% CI) = 3.4 (1.8–6.2)], vitamin D < 20 ng/mL [AHR (95% CI) = 4.5 (2.1–9.9)], drug resistance [AHR (95% CI) = 2.2 (1.4–3.6)], and VF [AHR (95% CI) = 2.82 (1.21, 3.53)] had a higher hazard of disease progression; whereas, being orphan [AOR (95% CI) = 1.8 (1.2–3.1)], history of drug substitution [(AOR (95% CI) = 4.8 (2.1–6.5), hemoglobin < 12 mg/dL [AOR (95% CI) = 1.2 (1.1–2.1)] had higher odds of developing drug resistance. Conclusions: Immunosuppression was increasing over time and drug resistance was also substantially high. Enhancing routine monitoring of viral load and HIVDR and providing a vitamin-D supplement during clinical management could help improve the immunologic outcome. Limiting HAART substitution is also crucial for children taking HAART in Ethiopia. Full article

Increased HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) with antiretroviral therapy (ART) rollout may jeopardize therapeutic options, especially in this era of transition to fixed-dose tenofovir-lamivudine-dolutegravir (TLD). We studied acquired HIVDR (ADR) patterns and describe potentially active drugs after first- and second-line failure in resource-limited settings (RLS) like Cameroon. A laboratory-based study with 759 patients (≥15 years) experiencing virological failure was carried out at the Chantal Biya International Reference Centre (CIRCB), Yaoundé, Cameroon. Socio-demographic, therapeutic and immunovirological data from patient records were analysed according to HIV-1 genotypic profiles. Median (IQR) ART-duration was 63 (50–308) months. Median CD4 and viremia were 153 (IQR:50–308) cells/mm³ and 138,666 (IQR:28,979–533,066) copies/mL, respectively. Overall ADR was high (93.4% first-line; 92.9%-second-line). TDF, potentially active in 35.7% of participants after first-line and 45.1% after second-line, suggested sub-optimal TLD-efficacy in second-line (64.3%) and third-line (54.9%). All PI/r preserved high efficacy after first-line failure while only DRV/r preserved high-level efficacy (87.9%) after second-line failure. In this resource-limited setting (RLS), ADR is high in ART-failing patients. PI/r strategies remain potent backbones for second-line ART, while only DRV/r remains very potent despite second-line failure. Though TLD use would be preferable, blind use for second- and third-line regimens may be sub-optimal (functional monotherapy with dolutegravir) with high risk of further failure, thus suggesting strategies for selective ART switch to TLD in failing patients in RLS. Full article

Monitoring of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) remains critical for ensuring countries attain and sustain the global goals for ending HIV as a public health threat by 2030. On an individual patient level, drug resistance results assist in ensuring unnecessary treatment switches are avoided and subsequent regimens are tailored on a case-by-case basis, should resistance be detected. Although there is a disparity in access to HIVDR testing in high-income countries compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICS), more LMICs have now included HIVDR testing for individual patient management in some groups of patients. In this review, we describe different strategies for surveillance as well as where HIVDR testing can be implemented for individual patient management. In addition, we briefly review available technologies for HIVDR testing in LMICs, including Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and some point-of-care options. Finally, we describe how South Africa has implemented HIVDR testing in the public sector. Full article

The efficacy of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) may be hampered by the presence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR). We described HIV-1 pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) patterns, effect of viral clades on PDR, and programmatic implications on first-line regimens in Cameroon. A sentinel surveillance of PDR was conducted from 2014 to 2019. Sequencing of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase was performed, and HIVDR was interpreted using Stanford HIVdb.v.9.4. In total, 379 sequences were obtained from participants (62% female, mean age 36 ± 10 years). The overall PDR rate was 15.0% [95% CI: 11.8–19.0] nationwide, with significant disparity between regions (p = 0.03). NNRTI PDR was highest (12.4%), of which 7.9% had DRMs to EFV/NVP. Two regions had EFV/NVP PDR above the 10% critical threshold, namely the Far North (15%) and East (10.9%). Eighteen viral strains were identified, predominated by CRF02_AG (65.4%), with no influence of genetic diversity PDR occurrence. TDF-3TC-DTG predictive efficacy was superior (98.4%) to TDF-3TC-EFV (92%), p < 0.0001. The overall high rate of PDR in Cameroon, not substantially affected by the wide HIV-1 genetic diversity, underscores the poor efficacy of EFV/NVP-based first-line ART nationwide, with major implications in two regions of the country. This supports the need for a rapid transition to NNRTI-sparing regimens, with TDF-3TC-DTG having optimal efficacy at the programmatic level. Full article

Background: Drug-resistance mutations were mostly detected using capillary electrophoresis sequencing, which does not detect minor variants with a frequency below 20%. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) can now detect additional mutations which can be useful for HIV-1 drug resistance interpretation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performances of CE-IVD assays for HIV-1 drug-resistance assessment both for target-specific and whole-genome sequencing, using standardized end-to-end solution platforms. Methods: A total of 301 clinical samples were prepared, extracted, and amplified for the three HIV-1 genomic targets, Protease (PR), Reverse Transcriptase (RT), and Integrase (INT), using the CE-IVD DeepChek^® Assays; and then 19 clinical samples, using the CE-IVD DeepChek^® HIV Whole Genome Assay, were sequenced on the NGS iSeq100 and MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequences were compared to those obtained by capillary electrophoresis. Quality control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) samples was added to validate the clinical accuracy of these in vitro diagnostics (IVDs). Nineteen clinical samples were then tested with the same sample collection, handling, and measurement procedure for evaluating the use of NGS for whole-genome HIV-1. Sequencing analyzer outputs were submitted to a downstream CE-IVD standalone software tailored for HIV-1 analysis and interpretation. Results: The limits of range detection were 1000 to 10⁶ cp/mL for the HIV-1 target-specific sequencing. The median coverage per sample for the three amplicons (PR/RT and INT) was 13,237 reads. High analytical reproducibility and repeatability were evidenced by a positive percent agreement of 100%. Duplicated samples in two distinct NGS runs were 100% homologous. NGS detected all the mutations found by capillary electrophoresis and identified additional resistance variants. A perfect accuracy score with the QCMD panel detection of drug-resistance mutations was obtained. Conclusions: This study is the first evaluation of the DeepChek^® Assays for targets specific (PR/RT and INT) and whole genome. A cutoff of 3% allowed for a better characterization of the viral population by identifying additional resistance mutations and improving the HIV-1 drug-resistance interpretation. The use of whole-genome sequencing is an additional and complementary tool to detect mutations in newly infected untreated patients and heavily experienced patients, both with higher HIV-1 viral-load profiles, to offer new insight and treatment strategies, especially using the new HIV-1 capsid/maturation inhibitors and to assess the potential clinical impact of mutations in the HIV-1 genome outside of the usual HIV-1 targets (RT/PR and INT). Full article

The first nationally representative cross-sectional HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) survey was conducted in Uruguay in 2018–2019 among adults diagnosed with HIV and initiating or reinitiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). Protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase genes of HIV-1 were sequenced. A total of 206 participants were enrolled in the survey; 63.2% were men, 85.7% were >25 years of age, and 35.6% reported previous exposure to antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. The prevalence of HIVDR to efavirenz or nevirapine was significantly higher (OR: 1.82, p < 0.001) in adults with previous ARV drug exposure (20.3%, 95% CI: 18.7–22.0%) compared to adults without previous ARV drug exposure (12.3%, 11.0–13.8%). HIVDR to any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was 10.3% (9.4–11.2%). HIVDR to ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors was 1.5% (1.1–2.1%); resistance to ritonavir-boosted darunavir was 0.9% (0.4–2.1%) among adults without previous ARV drug exposure and it was not observed among adults with previous ARV drug exposure. Resistance to integrase inhibitors was 12.7% (11.7–13.8%), yet HIVDR to dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir was not observed. The high level (>10%) of HIVDR to efavirenz highlights the need to accelerate the transition to the WHO-recommended dolutegravir-based ART. Access to dolutegravir-based ART should be prioritised for people reporting previous ARV drug exposure. Full article