Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = H2020 MORE&LESS project

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 13878 KiB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of Model Support, Closed Engine Nacelle and Scale Effect on a Wind Tunnel Test Model
by Ioan-Laurentiu Padureanu, Dumitru Pepelea, Gilbert Stoican, Marco Marini, Nicole Viola and Matthew Clay
Aerospace 2024, 11(6), 464; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060464 - 11 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1474
Abstract
In the frame of the H2020 MORE&LESS project co-funded by European Commission, a test campaign for a hypersonic vehicle demonstrator took place at the INCAS Trisonic Facility. CFD analysis was used to quantify the effects of the wind tunnel model support, the closed [...] Read more.
In the frame of the H2020 MORE&LESS project co-funded by European Commission, a test campaign for a hypersonic vehicle demonstrator took place at the INCAS Trisonic Facility. CFD analysis was used to quantify the effects of the wind tunnel model support, the closed engine nacelle, and to perform the Reynolds number extrapolation. Three sets of simulations were used in order to generate the corrections. The wind tunnel configuration with sting, sting cavity, and closed nacelle was used as the baseline, with the aim of matching the experimental results as precisely as possible. A configuration with a flow-through nacelle and the shock cone in the appropriate position for each Mach number and no sting or cavity was used to determine the effect of the sting and the closed nacelle. For the Reynolds extrapolation, a 1:1 model was used, with the boundary conditions deriving from the theoretical trajectory of the vehicle. The CFD results for the wind tunnel configuration closely align with the experimental data. Significant differences between the three configurations can be observed just for the pitching moment, and those are caused by the presence of the sting and the open nacelle. The difference in Reynolds number does not seem to have a significant effect on the aerodynamic coefficients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4231 KiB  
Article
Aerodatabase Development and Integration and Mission Analysis of a Mach 2 Supersonic Civil Aircraft
by Pietro Roncioni, Marco Marini, Oscar Gori, Roberta Fusaro and Nicole Viola
Aerospace 2024, 11(2), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11020111 - 25 Jan 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2111
Abstract
The request for faster and greener civil aviation is urging the worldwide scientific community and aerospace industry to develop a new generation of supersonic aircraft, which are expected to be environmentally sustainable and to guarantee a high-level protection of citizens. A key aspect [...] Read more.
The request for faster and greener civil aviation is urging the worldwide scientific community and aerospace industry to develop a new generation of supersonic aircraft, which are expected to be environmentally sustainable and to guarantee a high-level protection of citizens. A key aspect to monitor the potential environmental impact of new configurations is the aerodynamic efficiency and its impact onto the real mission. To pursue this goal, this paper discloses increasing-fidelity aerodynamic modeling approaches to improve the conceptual design of high-speed vehicles. The disclosed methodology foresees the development of aerodynamic aerodatabases by means of incremental steps starting from simplified methods (panels methods and/or low-fidelity CFD simulations) up to very reliable data based on high-fidelity CFD simulations and experimental measurements with associated confidence levels. This multifidelity approach enables the possibility of supporting the aircraft design process at different stages of its design cycle, from the estimation of preliminary aerodynamic coefficients at the beginning of the conceptual design, up to the development of tailored aerodatabases at advanced design phases. For each design stage, a build-up approach is adopted, starting from the investigation of the clean external configuration up to the complete one, including control surfaces’ effects and, if any, the effects of the integration of the propulsive effects. In addition, the applicability of the approach is guaranteed for a wide range of supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, and the developed methodology is here applied to the characterization of Mach 2 aircraft configuration, a relevant case study of the H2020 MORE&LESS project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 677 KiB  
Review
A Review of the Current Regulatory Framework for Supersonic Civil Aircraft: Noise and Emissions Regulations
by Thomas Rötger, Chris Eyers and Roberta Fusaro
Aerospace 2024, 11(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010019 - 25 Dec 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4755
Abstract
The request for faster and greener civil aviation is urging the worldwide scientific community and aerospace industry to develop a new generation of supersonic aircraft, which are expected to be environmentally sustainable, and to guarantee a high level of protection for citizens. The [...] Read more.
The request for faster and greener civil aviation is urging the worldwide scientific community and aerospace industry to develop a new generation of supersonic aircraft, which are expected to be environmentally sustainable, and to guarantee a high level of protection for citizens. The availability of novel propulsive technologies, together with the development of new civil supersonic passenger aircraft configurations and missions, is pushing international authorities to update the regulatory framework to limit nuisances on the ground and the contribution to climate change. Existing ICAO noise and emissions standards are outdated as they were developed in the 1970s and tailored to Concorde, the only SST that has ever operated in Western airspace. This article provides (i) a comprehensive review of current environmental regulations for SST, encompassing noise and pollutant emissions near airports (LTO cycle) as well as CO2 emissions and sonic booms, and (ii) updated information about the ongoing rulemaking activities by ICAO, FAA and EASA. This review clearly highlights the following findings: (i) the need to revise current rules to better fit future SST design, operations and technologies; (ii) the need to introduce new regulations to cover additional aspects, including stratospheric water vapour emissions and ozone depletion; and (iii) the need to support regulatory activities with solid technical bases, fostering cooperation with academia, research centres and industry in R&D projects. Eventually, a practical example of how SST rulemaking activities are supported by the collaborative research H2020 MORE&LESS is reported. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop