Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Green Star rating tool

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 2489 KiB  
Article
Framework for a Simulation Learning Tool to Optimize Green Star Buildings in South Africa
by Theogan Logan Pillay and Akshay Kumar Saha
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1565; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041565 - 13 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1362
Abstract
The Green Building Council of South Africa specifies nine parameters for energy efficiency in buildings. These parameters are in dynamic systemic interaction with each other and with other building design elements. Therefore, the issue of optimization in terms of the Green Star rating [...] Read more.
The Green Building Council of South Africa specifies nine parameters for energy efficiency in buildings. These parameters are in dynamic systemic interaction with each other and with other building design elements. Therefore, the issue of optimization in terms of the Green Star rating system is a complex problem that defies complete resolution and sustainability. Partial resolution, using algorithmic optimization convergence and simulation techniques, holds potential. The specific problem that this paper confronts is the need for engineers, and others, to be able to assess energy-efficient early design decisions within tight time frames. A proposition is made regarding further developing a “green” simulation learning tool for practitioners. This paper explores the potential of MATLAB and EnergyPlus to create a simulated learning space for green energy optimization. While recognized as being an abstraction from the total set of nine Green Building Council of South Africa parameters, the purpose is to introduce principles that can be extended into a multi-variable, more complex context of multiple sustainability criteria. This paper concludes with a framework for a simulation model that optimizes one of the Green Star criteria of the Green Building Council of South Africa supported by case study data for four, five, and six star rated buildings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1929 KiB  
Article
Passive, Low-Energy Design and Green Star Strategy for Green Star-Rated Buildings in South Africa
by Theogan Logan Pillay and Akshay Kumar Saha
Energies 2022, 15(23), 9128; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239128 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2868
Abstract
Services surrounding green buildings are specialised and directed towards the process of design and comprise comprehensive and quantified management in its entirety. Implicitly, consultancies are unable to deliver this service at the standard and pace required in the preliminary stages of design, and [...] Read more.
Services surrounding green buildings are specialised and directed towards the process of design and comprise comprehensive and quantified management in its entirety. Implicitly, consultancies are unable to deliver this service at the standard and pace required in the preliminary stages of design, and not all clients or consultants will require the services to be essential. The main aim is to stabilise the several characteristics prompting one another to optimise design performance against the optimisation algorithms. Green Star is a universal evaluation tool, assessing not only green characteristics but also elements that influence wellbeing and occupant health, such as indoor environment quality. The tools for Green Star rating can be used to measure the green features of a building from the design phase right to the stage of site handover (known as “As-Built”). This paper refers, in the literature review, to the passive and low-energy design methods of a Green Star-rated building at early design stages. The “green” project management of a project is to coordinate multidisciplinary incorporation and to accompany the costing contribution tools presented in this paper. The passive and low-energy design tools discussed entails the amalgamation of electrical and mechanical services together with architecture, i.e., space layout and envelope design. This paper compares rationalised energy and indoor environment performance between two buildings against the activities and climatic conditions within a targeted Green Star-rated building. Proposals regarding 4- and 6-star ratings and techniques have been evaluated and presented for the two buildings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Buildings for a Sustainable Future)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7357 KiB  
Article
Vertical Greening Systems: A Critical Comparison of Do-It-Yourself Designs
by Laura Dominici, Elena Comino, Fraser Torpy and Peter Irga
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3230; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233230 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5859
Abstract
Due to the increasing shortage of space in urban areas, vertical greening systems (VGSs) are becoming increasingly popular as a means to provide increased urban greening using building façades. VGSs are usually installed and managed by experts due to technical complexity, however the [...] Read more.
Due to the increasing shortage of space in urban areas, vertical greening systems (VGSs) are becoming increasingly popular as a means to provide increased urban greening using building façades. VGSs are usually installed and managed by experts due to technical complexity, however the role of local communities is becoming increasingly important through Do-It-Yourself (DIY) practices. This study aims to explore low-cost VGSs and provide design suggestions and maintenance indications to encourage the expanded use of in situ small-scale VGSs. Firstly, an exploratory review of VGS designs proposed in the scientific literature, and by commercial and community-based solutions was conducted taking DIY potential into account to define eight basic design models categorized through six structural criteria. Then, seven community garden groups were interviewed to inform a critical comparison of the eight design models. Data collected was synthesized to develop a star rating system, thus providing a quick comparative tool. The star rating system shows the performance of five relevant DIY design parameters for each VGS model. The current research may assist in the accessibility of green technologies and facilitate community-scale implementation of DIY vertical greening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ornamental Plants and Urban Gardening)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2027 KiB  
Article
Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Mandatory Green Certified Offices in Australia: Evidence and Lessons Learnt across 2011–2020
by Sumin Kim, Benson Teck Heng Lim and Bee Lan Oo
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 13773; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113773 - 24 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2762
Abstract
With the changing trends in global climate and increasing awareness of the environmental impact of the built environment, private and public sector building stakeholders are under constant and mounting pressure to reduce carbon emissions, energy consumption and waste generation. Conceptually, green building regulations [...] Read more.
With the changing trends in global climate and increasing awareness of the environmental impact of the built environment, private and public sector building stakeholders are under constant and mounting pressure to reduce carbon emissions, energy consumption and waste generation. Conceptually, green building regulations are claimed to be the most effective tool toward promoting better environmental outcomes. Nonetheless, there is limited empirical evidence to justify claims for their effectiveness, especially in the Australian context, despite the introduction of various green building standards and regulations over the past two decades. In addressing this gap, this research aims to map the energy consumption and carbon emissions of certified offices under the mandatory Commercial Building Disclosure program. For this, the energy and carbon efficiencies of green certified commercial offices within the eight Australian central business districts (CBD) for 2011–2020 were assessed, and the offices were classified as green and non-green offices, based on their National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) of fewer than 4, and 4 and above stars, respectively. Data were extracted from the Commercial Building Disclosure program datasheet and thereafter analysed using various descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Furthermore, the normalisation process was undertaken to capture the relative changes in energy and environmental performance between green and non-green offices. The results show an encouraging trend of a possible significant improvement in energy savings, and a reduction in carbon emissions for offices that have undergone retrofit and obtained an increase in their NABERS ratings. However, it is notable that 6-star NABERS-certified offices sometimes tend to save less energy than their 4- and 5-star rated counterparts, despite their high initial investment costs. Thus, this informs policymakers, authorities and practitioners that the highest NABERS rating does not necessarily help reduce energy consumption in buildings, and that greater emphasis should be placed on promoting the use of a whole building design approach, by exploring a more effective and appropriate combination of features, systems and materials based on stakeholders’ needs and behaviours. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Green Building)
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 172 KiB  
Abstract
Designing an Audit Tool to Evaluate the National Healthy Food and Drink Policy: The HYPE Study
by Stephanie Shen, Bruce Kidd, Sally Mackay, Lisa Te Morenga, Sarah Gerritsen, Yannan Jiang, Magda Rosin, Elaine Umali and Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 9(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2022009027 - 7 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1217
Abstract
The National Healthy Food and Drink Policy (NHFDP) was developed to promote healthy food environments for the New Zealand District Health Board (DHB) staff and visitors. The policy classifies food and drinks as red, amber, or green and sets benchmarks for the proportions [...] Read more.
The National Healthy Food and Drink Policy (NHFDP) was developed to promote healthy food environments for the New Zealand District Health Board (DHB) staff and visitors. The policy classifies food and drinks as red, amber, or green and sets benchmarks for the proportions of red, amber, and green foods that should be available on-site. The HYPE (Healthy Policy Evaluation) study is the first national evaluation of the implementation and impact of the NHFDP. We designed an electronic audit tool to collect detailed food and drink data across a range of food settings (vending machines and all food outlets) at New Zealand DHBs and some government agencies. The electronic audit tool collects all the information required to classify food and drinks under the NHFDP (photographs of foods and drinks, item weight/volume, energy and nutrient content, ingredient composition, and Health Star Rating). The web-based tool was created using Drupal (web content management framework) and pilot tested. The tool is now in use by the HYPE team in DHBs across New Zealand. Data collection commenced in March 2021 and has been completed for nine DHBs (5700 products) so far. Audit results detailing the proportion of red, amber, and green food items available at all participating institutions will be available in late 2022. Ongoing stakeholder feedback and requirements have been incorporated throughout the design process and used to improve the audit tool. This feedback has informed key lessons such as agreeing the tool’s aims and objectives collectively with stakeholders/potential end users, pilot testing the tool prior to use, and ensuring the tool is simple and accessible for all end-users. This new electronic food setting audit tool has successfully facilitated comprehensive and standardised data collection across a range of retail settings. Full article
10 pages, 581 KiB  
Entry
SEM-PLS Approach to Green Building
by Nasim Aghili and Mehdi Amirkhani
Encyclopedia 2021, 1(2), 472-481; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1020039 - 18 Jun 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5237
Definition
Green buildings refer to buildings that decrease adverse environmental effects and maintain natural resources. They can diminish energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, the usage of non-renewable materials, water consumption, and waste generation while improving occupants’ health and well-being. As such, several rating tools [...] Read more.
Green buildings refer to buildings that decrease adverse environmental effects and maintain natural resources. They can diminish energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, the usage of non-renewable materials, water consumption, and waste generation while improving occupants’ health and well-being. As such, several rating tools and benchmarks have been developed worldwide to assess green building performance (GBP), including the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) in the United Kingdom, German Sustainable Building Council (DGNB), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) in the United States and Canada, Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE) in Japan, Green Star in Australia, Green Mark in Singapore, and Green Building Index in Malaysia. Energy management (EM) during building operation could also improve GBP. One of the best approaches to evaluating the impact of EM on GBP is by using structural equation modelling (SEM). SEM is a commanding statistical method to model testing. One of the most used SEM variance-based approaches is partial least squares (PLS), which can be implemented in the SmartPLS application. PLS-SEM uses path coefficients to determine the strength and significance of the hypothesised relationships between the latent constructs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Encyclopedia of ZEMCH Research and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1108 KiB  
Article
Why Are Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces Not Popular in New Zealand?
by Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, Hugh Byrd, Blair Money, Jasper Mbachu and Temtiope Egbelakin
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060902 - 26 May 2017
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5782
Abstract
In this paper, we investigated the reason(s) why natural ventilation is not as popular as air-conditioned or mixed-mode ventilation systems in Green-rated office buildings in New Zealand. To achieve this, we had three objectives. Firstly, we reviewed the Green Star criteria for thermal [...] Read more.
In this paper, we investigated the reason(s) why natural ventilation is not as popular as air-conditioned or mixed-mode ventilation systems in Green-rated office buildings in New Zealand. To achieve this, we had three objectives. Firstly, we reviewed the Green Star criteria for thermal comfort in office buildings to ascertain which ventilation system the NZ Green Star rating tool promotes. Secondly, we ascertained the perception of occupants in office buildings regarding thermal comfort. This was followed by an interview with building experts regarding factors that affect the use of natural ventilation in New Zealand offices. The findings showed that the NZ Green Star thermal comfort criteria encourage the use of mechanical ventilation over natural ventilation which results in designers opting for air conditioning systems in office designs. We observed that occupants of naturally ventilated spaces were least satisfied with the thermal comfort of their offices when compared with occupants of mixed-mode and air-conditioned offices. This study fulfils the need to encourage the use of natural ventilation in office environments by designers and building owners. Further study on other aspects of the indoor environment quality that is related to naturally ventilated systems such as lighting and noise is required in a bid to ascertain its viability in office environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Assessments of Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2346 KiB  
Article
The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings
by Hugh Byrd and Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed
Sustainability 2016, 8(4), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040347 - 8 Apr 2016
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 11358
Abstract
In this paper we challenge the notion that “green” buildings can achieve greater productivity than buildings that are not accredited as “green”. For nearly two decades, research has produced apparent evidence which indicates that the design of a “green” building can enhance the [...] Read more.
In this paper we challenge the notion that “green” buildings can achieve greater productivity than buildings that are not accredited as “green”. For nearly two decades, research has produced apparent evidence which indicates that the design of a “green” building can enhance the productivity of its occupants. This relationship between building design and productivity is claimed to be achieved through compliance with internal environmental quality (IEQ) criteria of Green rating tools. This paper reviews methods of measuring productivity and the appropriateness of the metrics used for measuring IEQ in office environments. This review is supported by the results of a survey of office building users which identifies social factors to be significantly more important than environmental factors in trying to correlate productivity and IEQ. It also presents the findings of observations that were discretely carried out on user-response in green buildings. These findings demonstrate that, despite a building’s compliance with IEQ criteria, occupants still resort to exceptional measures to alter their working environment in a bid to achieve comfort. The work has been carried out on “green” buildings in New Zealand. These buildings are rated based on the NZ “Green Star” system which has adopted the Australian “green star” system with its roots in BREEAM. Despite this, the results of this research are applicable to many other “green” rating systems. The paper concludes that methods of measuring productivity are flawed, that IEQ criteria for building design is unrepresentative of how occupants perceive the environment and that this can lead to an architecture that has few of the inherent characteristics of good environmental design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Post Occupancy Evaluation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop