Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Gradient Boosting Tree Regression (GBTR)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 9604 KB  
Article
An Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Leaf Area Index Retrieval
by Dong Wang, Lijuan Miao, Yutian Lu, Hanyang Jiang and Qiang Liu
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(12), 1884; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121884 - 7 Jun 2026
Viewed by 254
Abstract
The Leaf Area Index (LAI) serves as a vital biophysical parameter for quantifying vegetation dynamics and ecosystem functioning. While traditional LAI retrieval methods face challenges in handling nonlinear spectral-vegetation relationships, machine learning (ML) approaches offer promising alternatives through their data-driven adaptability. This study [...] Read more.
The Leaf Area Index (LAI) serves as a vital biophysical parameter for quantifying vegetation dynamics and ecosystem functioning. While traditional LAI retrieval methods face challenges in handling nonlinear spectral-vegetation relationships, machine learning (ML) approaches offer promising alternatives through their data-driven adaptability. This study presents a comprehensive cross-site assessment of 13 ML algorithms for LAI estimation, leveraging ground observations from 98 sites worldwide. Our systematic assessment reveals three key findings: First, ensemble methods consistently outperformed other approaches, with Gradient Boosted Tree Regression (GBTR) achieving superior accuracy (R2 = 0.647, RMSE = 0.899) and robustness (ΔR2 < 0.05 beyond n = 69 training samples). Second, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) illustrated exceptional stability across varying training sizes (R2 = 0.607 ± 0.012), highlighting its reliability for data-limited scenarios. Third, all tested ML models substantially outperformed operational LAI products, with the GBTR model demonstrating superior explanatory power (external validation R2 = 0.647) compared to MODIS; its R2 value had increased by 0.489. This optimal balance of accuracy, computational efficiency, and resistance to overfitting positions GBTR as a reasonable choice for large-scale LAI mapping. These findings underscore ML’s promising potential in vegetation monitoring while highlighting the need for hybrid approaches that combine physical principles with data-driven learning to address current limitations in extreme-value estimation and ecological generalizability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop