Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Darevskia praticola

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1769 KiB  
Article
Comparing Preferred Temperatures and Evaporative Water Loss Rates in Two Syntopic Populations of Lacertid Lizard Species
by Jelena Ćorović, Nada Ćosić and Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailović
Animals 2024, 14(24), 3642; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14243642 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 996
Abstract
Many reptiles actively regulate their body temperature. During thermoregulation, they suffer evaporative water loss (EWL). Since evaporation increases with temperature, EWL could limit the activity of ectotherms when water is not available. In this study, we compared the preferred body temperatures (Tp [...] Read more.
Many reptiles actively regulate their body temperature. During thermoregulation, they suffer evaporative water loss (EWL). Since evaporation increases with temperature, EWL could limit the activity of ectotherms when water is not available. In this study, we compared the preferred body temperatures (Tp) and EWL of two lacertid lizard species, Darevskia praticola and Podarcis muralis, at the western edge of D. praticola’s range, where they live in syntopy. We hypothesized that D. praticola, a species that inhabits forested and humid environments, would have a higher EWL than the more widespread P. muralis. Our results show that D. praticola prefers lower temperatures (mean Tp = 28.1 °C) than P. muralis (mean Tp = 30.6 °C). Despite the differences in their thermal preferences, both species showed similar total EWL (2.76% for D. praticola and 2.67% for P. muralis), although their daily patterns of water loss differed. Our results suggest that D. praticola has developed mechanisms to control water loss and that its lower thermal preference may be due to both historical factors and local adaptations. These results contribute to the understanding of how environmental factors influence the physiology of lizards, which in turn has implications for predicting the effects of climate change on species distribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ecology and Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1693 KiB  
Article
16S rRNA Gene Sequencing-Based Identification and Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Five Syntopic Lizard Species from a Low-Mountain Area in Western Bulgaria
by Irina Lazarkevich, Stephan Engibarov, Simona Mitova, Emiliya Vacheva, Steliyana Popova, Nikola Stanchev, Rumyana Eneva, Yana Gocheva, Ivanka Boyadzhieva and Maria Gerginova
Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 4(1), 181-193; https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol4010013 - 18 Jan 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2139
Abstract
Studies on the gut microbiome of free-living reptiles in Europe are generally fragmentary and still missing in Bulgaria. We aimed to identify and compare the fecal microbiota profiles of five syntopic lizard species from three families: the European green lizard (Lacerta viridis [...] Read more.
Studies on the gut microbiome of free-living reptiles in Europe are generally fragmentary and still missing in Bulgaria. We aimed to identify and compare the fecal microbiota profiles of five syntopic lizard species from three families: the European green lizard (Lacerta viridis), the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis), the meadow lizard (Darevskia praticola) (Lacertidae), the European snake-eyed skink (Ablepharus kitaibelii) (Scincidae), and the European slow worm (Anguis fragilis) (Anguidae), which coinhabit a low mountainous area in the western part of the country. A high-throughput sequencing of the hypervariable V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, performed on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform, was used. The core microbiota of lizard hosts seems to be species-specific. A dynamic phyla proportion between hosts was found. The richest alpha diversity was observed in D. praticola, and the lowest alpha diversity was observed in P. muralis and A. fragilis. Within the three lacertids, the microbiota of D. praticola and L. viridis were more closely related to each other than they were to those of P. muralis. Sharing a largely common trophic resource (all species except A. fragilis are mainly insectivorous) was not an indication of similarity in their gut microbial communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop